Knowing Left from Right: Ideological Identification in Brazil, 2002-2006
Open accessAbstract
Ideology, typically defined on a left-right spectrum, should provide a means of communication between elites and masses. After years of leftist party rule, have Brazilian voters internalized ideological divisions? Longitudinal surveys conducted from 2002 to 2006 reveal high nonresponse and instability in ideological self-identification. We find that the capacity to think ideologically is in part a function of political and social context. This capacity has real political consequences. A Heckman selection model reveals that those who refuse to take an ideological position or who exhibit high instability in self-identification tend to be latent rightists and to choose rightist presidential candidates. Moreover, they interpret the ideological spectrum differently from those who are more consistent in ideological self-placement. We thus make two contributions, showing how contextual factors influence ideological thinking and how low levels of ideological thinking affect the measurement of Brazilian public opinion.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brazilians lack a basic understanding of left and right and show low levels of issue constraint.
“Similarly, Brazilians are said to lack a basic understanding of left and right and to show low levels of issue constraint (Ames and Smith 2010; Kearney and Machado 2018).”
From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Ames and Smith 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate
Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (1998) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647642 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comellas, J. M., & Torcal, M. (2023) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102615 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Ideologia e comportamento político no eleitorado brasileiro
Oliveira, C., & Turgeon, M. (2015) · Opinião Pública · doi:10.1590/1807-01912015213574 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil
Areal, J. (2022) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2022.2117635 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ames, B., & Smith, A. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- ORCID
- Smith, Amy Erica
- Venue
- Journal of Politics in Latin America
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3-38
- ISSN
- 1866-802X (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4890
- OpenAlex
- W2156045482
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Politics in Latin America (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- ideological self-identification, left-right ideology, nonresponse, measurement instability, political context, social environment, public opinion measurement, Brazilian voters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review