Cited by 35Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Psychosocial Keys to African American Achievement? Examining the Relationship Between Achievement and Psychosocial Variables in High Achieving African Americans

Dixson, Dante D., Roberson, Cyrell C. B., Worrell, Frank C.·2017·Journal of Advanced Academics

Abstract

Grit, growth mindset, ethnic identity, and other group orientation are four psychosocial variables that have been associated with academic achievement in adolescent populations. In a sample of 105 high achieving African American high school students (cumulative grade point average [GPA] > 3.0), we examined whether these four psychosocial variables contributed to the achievement of high achieving African Americans beyond the contribution of socioeconomic status (SES) and other demographic variables. Results indicated that the psychosocial variables were not significant predictors of academic achievement for the high achieving African American students in this sample. However, SES was a significant predictor of the academic achievement with a medium effect size. These findings suggest that interventions focused on grit, growth mindset, ethnic identity, and other group orientation may not be as effective as hypothesized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932202x17701734

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychosocial factors are important in helping gifted students develop their potential gifts, though some factors are probably more useful than others.

    “Psychosocial variables also play an important role in supporting gifted students in developing their potential gifts, although some of these variables are likely to be more useful than others (Dixson et al. 2016(Dixson et al. , 2017)).”

    From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as Dixson et al. 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dixson, D. D., Roberson, C. C. B., & Worrell, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Dixson, Dante D.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Academics
Published
2017-03-31
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
120-140
ISSN
  • 1077-4610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-202X
  • 2162-9536
OpenAlex
W2599872207
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Advanced Academics (publishedVersion)
Funders
African American Success Foundation (Lydia Donaldson Tutt-Jones Memorial Research Grant)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
African American students, academic performance, grit, growth mindset, ethnic identity, socioeconomic status, high-achieving students, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review