The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Use of Diabetes Devices: Clinician Perspectives on Barriers and Adherence to Device Use
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGM) can improve glycemic control for individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Device uptake rates continue to show room for improvement, and consistent adherence is needed to achieve better outcomes. Diabetes health care providers have important roles to play in promoting device use and adherence. METHODS: We surveyed 209 clinicians who treat people with type 1 diabetes to examine perceptions of barriers to device uptake, attitudes toward diabetes technology, and resources needed for clinicians to improve device uptake. We compared findings with our survey of adults with T1D. RESULTS: Younger clinicians treated more patients using insulin pumps ( r = -.26, P < .001) and CGM ( r = -.14, P = .02), and had more positive attitudes about diabetes technology ( r = -.23, P = .001). The most frequently endorsed modifiable barriers were perceptions that patients dislike having the device on their body (73% pump; 63% CGM), dislike the alarms (61% CGM), and do not understand what to do with device information or features (40% pump; 46% CGM). Clinicians wanted lower cost and better insurance coverage for their patients, and they recommended counseling and education to help address barriers and improve adherence to devices. CONCLUSION: Clinicians perceive many barriers to their patients initiating and adhering to diabetes devices. Findings highlight opportunities for intervention to improve clinician-patient communication around device barriers to help address them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For people with insulin-requiring diabetes, dosing instructions may be complex and confusing (3-6).”
From Observed Glycemic and Psychosocial Benefits in the Prospective Bigfoot Unity Real World Study: A 6-Month Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As injection therapy is used by more than 80% of people with insulin-requiring diabetes, there is a clear need for intuitive, integrated systems to help multiple daily injection (MDI) patients interpret CGM data into actionable management steps to reduce the burden of demanding self-care directives and support telemedicine (3, 6, 10-13).”
From Observed Glycemic and Psychosocial Benefits in the Prospective Bigfoot Unity Real World Study: A 6-Month Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While recent guidelines call for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use for all who require insulin, regardless of diabetes type (7), there is also evidence that patients may not know how to interpret what to do with the CGM data (6, 8, 9).”
From Observed Glycemic and Psychosocial Benefits in the Prospective Bigfoot Unity Real World Study: A 6-Month Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“As injection therapy is used by more than 80% of people with insulin-requiring diabetes, there is a clear need for intuitive, integrated systems to help multiple daily injection (MDI) patients interpret CGM data into actionable management steps to reduce the burden of demanding self-care directives and support telemedicine (3, 6, 10-13).”
From Observed Glycemic and Psychosocial Benefits in the Prospective Bigfoot Unity Real World Study: A 6-Month Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0805017 · Cited by 1,559
Miller, K. M., Foster, N. C., Beck, R. W., Bergenstal, R. M., DuBose, S. N., DiMeglio, L. A., Maahs, D. M., & Tamborlane, W. V. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0078 · Cited by 1,254
Klonoff, D. C. (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.5.1231 · Cited by 725
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry
Wong, J. C., Foster, N. C., Maahs, D. M., Raghinaru, D., Bergenstal, R. M., Ahmann, A. J., Peters, A. L., Bode, B. W., Aleppo, G., Hirsch, I. B., et al. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-0303 · Cited by 318
Use of Insulin Pump Therapy in the Pediatric Age-Group
Phillip, M., Battelino, T., Rodriguez, H., Danne, T., KAUFMAN, F. R., & participants, F. T. C. F. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-9922 · Cited by 311
Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pump Therapy: Results of the First Randomized Treat-to-Target Study
Hirsch, I. B., Abelseth, J. M., Bode, B. W., Fischer, J. S., KAUFMAN, F. R., Mastrototaro, J. J., Parkin, C. G., Wolpert, H. A., & Buckingham, B. A. (2008) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0068 · Cited by 297
Tanenbaum, M. L., Hanes, S. J., Miller, K. M., Naranjo, D., Bensen, R., & Hood, K. K. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-1536 · Cited by 296
Factors Predictive of Use and of Benefit From Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-0889 · Cited by 250
Pickup, J. C., Holloway, M., & Samsi, K. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-1855 · Cited by 203
Chase, H. P., Beck, R. W., Xing, D., Tamborlane, W. V., Coffey, J., Fox, L. A., Ives, B., Keady, J., Kollman, C., Laffel, L. M., et al. (2010) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2010.0021 · Cited by 142
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017 · DOI · Paper page
- Borges U, J Diabetes Sci Technol
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–117 of 117
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: An Overview for Nurse Practitioners
Neeley, C., & Freeborn, D. (2018) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University)
Evaluation of the Tolerability of a Steel Needle and an Adhesive for a Patch Pump
Jendrike, N. R. M., Freckmann, G., Krauß, C., Mende, J., Waldenmaier, D., Heinemann, L., Trippe, Z. A., & Websky, S. (2023) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968231176835
Ghafoor, E., & Eichorst, B. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-22106-4.00021-8
Current and Emerging Technologies for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus
Kollman, P., & Burke, E. (2024) · Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports · doi:10.1007/s40138-024-00281-y
Wong, J. J., Addala, A., ALAMARIE, S. A., Hanes, S. J., Krugman, S., Naranjo, D. M., Nelmes, S., Rose, K. J., Schneider‐Utaka, A. K., Tanenbaum, M. L., et al. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.60788
Flash glucose monitoring in diabetes
Lameijer, A. (2024) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.1021051970
Kaya, A. (2025) · Medical Records · doi:10.37990/medr.1645581
Outcomes in United States Veterans on Insulin Pumps Following Rapid Deployment of Telehealth Care
Orbell, S. L., Lund, B. C., Kim, N., Codario, R. A., Bandi, A., Mor, M. K., & Estock, J. L. (2026) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1177/15209156251403561
Banaś, A., Bigajski, H., Janczarski, S., Kwolek, K., Laskowska, W., Michalik, M., Owczarska, A., Pilarek, M., Sarna, D., & Widera, P. (2025) · International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science · doi:10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4457
Barriers to use of continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes
Argueta, A. S., Ng, J. M., & Zupa, M. F. (2026) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113217
Tanenbaum, M. L., CASSOFF, B., Pasmooij, M. B., Judge, K., KAELBERER, C. J., Hanes, S. J., Darji, H., & Basina, M. (2026) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-026-02845-3
Hayashi, S., Konaka, K., & HAMADA, R. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.107766
Palermo, L., Senga, J., Fakembe, P., Zhu, X., Walsh, C., Leslie, B., Shulman, R. M., Presseau, J., Dogba, M. J., Banerjee, A., et al. (2026) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.70819
Ehrmann, D., Roos, T., Kröger, J., Mühlen, H., Keuthage, W., Lueg, A., Scheper, N., Heinemann, L., Brandt, D., Hermanns, N., et al. (2026) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968261442286
Assisted Devices and Daily Life Adaptations in Diabetes
Das, U., Roy, D., Singh, S., & Mandal, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8946-3_13
Yıldırım, D., & Aras, D. (2026) · The International Journal of Artificial Organs · doi:10.1177/03913988261469882
Tesch, Z., Ujházi, T., & Buzás, N. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9939466/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanenbaum, M. L., Adams, R. N., Hanes, S. J., Barley, R. C., Miller, K. M., Mulvaney, S. A., & Hood, K. K.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hood, Korey K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-01-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 484-492
- ISSN
- 1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5505431
- OpenAlex
- W2572387108
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, insulin pump, continuous glucose monitors, diabetes technology adoption, device adherence, clinician attitudes, clinician-patient communication, patient education, insurance coverage, device cost
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Insulin Infusion Systems, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Patient Compliance, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
