Cited by 32Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Pilot Study of a Novel Application for Data Visualization in Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Wong, Jenise C., Neinstein, Aaron B., Look, Howard, Arbiter, Brandon, Chokr, Nora, Ross, Cassie, Adi, Saleh·2017·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background: A novel software application, Blip, was created to combine and display diabetes data from multiple devices in a uniform, user-friendly manner. The objective of this study was to test the usability of this application by adults and caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: Patients (n = 35) and caregivers of children with T1D (n = 30) using an insulin pump for >1 year ± CGM were given access to the software for 3 months. Diabetes management practices and the use of diabetes data were assessed at baseline and at study end, and feedback was gathered in a concluding questionnaire. Results: At baseline, 97% of participants agreed it was important for patients to know how to interpret glucose data. Most felt that clinicians and patients should share the tasks of reviewing data, finding patterns, and making changes to their insulin plans. However, despite valuing shared responsibility, at baseline, 43% of participants never downloaded pump data, and only 9% did so at least once per month. At study end, 72% downloaded data at least once during the 3-month study, and 38% downloaded at least once per month. Regarding the software application, participants liked the central repository of data and the user interface. Suggestions included providing tools for understanding and interpreting glucose patterns, an easier uploading process, and access with mobile devices. Conclusions: Collaboration between developers and researchers prompted iterative, rapid development of data visualization software and improvements in the uploading process and user interface, which facilitates clinical integration and future clinical studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296817691305

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]14. Philips and Dutch Radboud University Medical Center introduce first diabetes prototype app with integrated online community to empower patients and enhance continuity of care. 2015. Available at: http://www.philips.com/a-w/about/news/archive/standard/news/press/2015/20150915-Philips-and-Dutch-Radboud-university-medical-center-introduce-first-diabetes-prototype-app.html. Accessed June 29, 2016.
  2. [16]16. Glooko announces compatibility with Medtronic MiniMed insulin pumps and sensors at the 2016 American Diabetes Association Conference. 2016. Available at: https://www.glooko.com/wp-content/uploads/MedtronicAnnouncementPRMay2016.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2016.
  3. [19]19. Glooko and Diasend merge to deliver the world’s premier diabetes management platform. 2016. Available at: https://www.glooko.com/press-release/glooko-diasend-merge/. Accessed October 26, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, J. C., Neinstein, A. B., Look, H., Arbiter, B., Chokr, N., Ross, C., & Adi, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Tidepool (US)
Corresponding author
Wong, Jenise C.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
800-807
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586286000
Cited by
32
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Dexcom
  • Tandem Diabetes Care
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Diego
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK107894)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, data visualization tools, BLIP, continuous glucose monitoring, usability, pediatric diabetes, caregivers, user interface, mobile access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Pilot Projects, Software, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Caregivers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review