Cited by 8Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Postoperative Length of Stay in Patients With Stress Hyperglycemia Compared to Patients With Diabetic Hyperglycemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Open access
Shiffermiller, Jason, Anderson, Matthew, Thompson, Rachel·2024·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background: Postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS) is longer in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes. Stress hyperglycemia (SH) in patients without a history of diabetes has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. The effect of SH on postoperative LOS is uncertain. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative LOS in patients with SH to patients with diabetic hyperglycemia (DH) following noncardiac surgery. Methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of inpatients with at least two glucose measurements ≥180 mg/dL. Two groups were compared. Patients with SH had no preoperative history of diabetes. Patients were considered to have DH if they had an established preoperative diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or a preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5%. The primary outcome measure was hospital LOS. Results: We included 270 patients with postoperative hyperglycemia—82 in the SH group and 188 in the DH group. In a linear regression analysis, hospital LOS was longer in the SH group than in the DH group (10.4 vs 7.3 days; P = .03). Within the SH group, we found no association between LOS and prompt treatment of hyperglycemia within 12 hours ( P = .43), insulin dose per day ( P = .89), or overall mean glucose ( P = .13). Conclusions: Postoperative LOS was even longer in patients with SH than in patients with DH, representing a potential target for quality improvement efforts. We did not, however, find evidence that improved treatment of SH was associated with reduction in LOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19322968241232695

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiffermiller, J., Anderson, M., & Thompson, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Snoqualmie Valley Hospital and Health District, Snoqualmie, WA, USA
Corresponding author
Shiffermiller, Jason
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2024-02-26
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
556-561
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392168457
Cited by
8
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
stress hyperglycemia, diabetic hyperglycemia, postoperative hospital stay, non-cardiac surgery, hyperglycemia treatment, insulin dose, HbA1c, diabetes mellitus, length of hospital stay
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review