The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Poaching Pays: A Summary of Risks and Benefits Illegal Hunters Face in Western Serengeti, Tanzania
Open accessAbstract
Illegal hunting poses a considerable threat to the wildlife of Serengeti National Park and its affiliated protected areas. Techniques for successful mitigation of this threat are heavily debated. Bottom-up community-based initiatives aim to curb poaching by linking local communities with wildlife conservation. Top-down anti-poaching enforcement of protected areas seeks to maintain wildlife populations through fines and prison sentences given to arrested poachers. Poverty stands as the major driver of illegal hunting as households vie for income and sustenance. Livelihoods of illegal hunters have been augmented considerably through revenue generated from bushmeat sales. Illegal hunters use bushmeat both for supplementing household protein and for economic gain. Obtaining bushmeat carries risks in the form of personal injury, fines, and/or prison sentences, if arrested. This paper compares these costs and benefits through a summary of the monetary benefits, bodily injuries, fines, and prison sentences that individuals endured over their poaching careers. Data were collected from 104 individuals, all of whom voluntarily admitted active or recent involvement in illegal hunting activities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The extremely high levels of poaching in SVC were the result of a large human population being settled on private land with large wildlife populations, and were exacerbated by Zimbabwe’s economic crisis and food shortages arising from the FTLRP (Knapp, 2012; Lindsey et al., 2011a; Moss, 2007)”
From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Knapp, 2012
Citations
Cites
The theory of decision making.
Edwards, W. (1954) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0053870 · Cited by 2,710
Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of Poverty
Adams, W. M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J. E., Hutton, J. M., Roe, D., Vira, B., & Wolmer, W. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097920 · Cited by 1,395
International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation
(2026) · International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.5897/ijbc · Cited by 563
Research methods in anthropology : qualitative and quantitative methods
Bernard, H. R. (2002) · Cited by 554
Serengeti II: Dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem
Leader‐Williams, N. (1996) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)81103-7 · Cited by 503
Serengeti II: Dynamics, Management and Conservation of an Ecosystem.
Deutsch, J. C., SINCLAIR, A. R. E., & Arcese, P. (1996) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404970 · Cited by 441 · cited 2×
“A lack of this information has resulted in an ongoing problem for wildlife officials attempting to better conserve the GSE’s world-renowned wildlife [3, 16].”
BackgroundFactors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania
Kideghesho, J. R., Røskaft, E., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (2006) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-006-9132-8 · Cited by 347 · cited 1×
“The primary means of poaching in the GSE is through the use of wire snares [10, 21, 22].”
BackgroundEffective enforcement in a conservation area.
Hilborn, R., Arcese, P., Borner, M., Hando, J., Hopcraft, G., Loibooki, M., Mduma, S., & Sinclair, A. R. E. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132780 · Cited by 339 · cited 4×
“intensified anti-poaching patrols [23].”
BackgroundInfluentialLoibooki, M., Hofer, H., Campbell, K. L. I., & East, M. L. (2002) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892902000279 · Cited by 276
Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest.
Thirgood, S., Mosser, A., Tham, S., Hopcraft, G., Mwangomo, E., Mlengeya, T., Kilewo, M., Fryxell, J., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Borner, M. (2004) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1017/s1367943004001404 · Cited by 253
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Campbell K. L. I., 2001, Sustainable use of wildland resources, ecological, economic, and social interactions: an analysis of illegal hunting in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania
- Arcese P., 1995, Serengeti II, 506
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gray, S. A., Gray, S., de Kok, J., Helfgott, A., O’Dwyer, B., Jordan, R., & Nyaki, A. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07396-200211 · Cited by 286
Developing a theory of change for a community‐based response to illegal wildlife trade
Biggs, D., Cooney, R., Roe, D., Dublin, H., Allan, J. R., Challender, D. W. S., & Skinner, D. (2016) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12796 · Cited by 216
Nuño, A., Bunnefeld, N., Naiman, L. C., & Milner‐Gulland, E. J. (2013) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12124 · Cited by 144
“Among these, we did not consider, for example, awareness of hunting regulations (Bitanyi et al. 2012), risk perceptions (Knapp 2012), and cultural reasons (Lowassa et al. 2012) for hunting.”
BackgroundAn ecosystem services framework to evaluate indigenous and local peoples’ connections with nature
Sangha, K. K., Preece, L. D., Villarreal‐Rosas, J., Kegamba, J. J., Paudyal, K., Warmenhoven, T. A., & Ramakrishnan, P. S. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.017 · Cited by 102
“…exclusion, discrimination, racial inequity, partisan political agendas as well as land grabbing that continue to occur to date at various local, national, regional scales, has led to suppression and suffering of many local and Indigenous communities (James et al. 2018; Krieger and Leroch 2016).”
BackgroundRentsch, D., & Damon, A. L. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.021 · Cited by 100
“Bushmeat hunting thus serves as both a source of food and income (Barnett, 2000; Bennett et al., 2002; Kaltenborn et al., 2005; Knapp, 2012; Knapp et al., 2010).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Knapp, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Houghton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Knapp, Eli J.
- Venue
- Tropical Conservation Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 434-445
- ISSN
- 1940-0829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2308692502
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Tropical Conservation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- poaching, bushmeat trade, wildlife conservation, community-based conservation, Serengeti National Park, imprisonment and fines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
