Cited by 91Gender Politics and RepresentationGender, Feminism, and MediaNews Media Framing and Political Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Gender of News and News of Gender: A Study of Sex, Politics, and Press Coverage of the 2010 British General Election

Open access
Ross, Karen, Evans, Elizabeth, Harrison, Lisa, Shears, Mary, Wadia, Khursheed·2013·The International Journal of Press/Politics

Abstract

In the months leading up to the 2010 British General Election, pundits were claiming that women would be specifically targeted by all political parties. However, this focus never materialized and it was just more business as usual but with the added novelty of televised leaders’ debates, which meant that coverage was more male ordered than ever. The study on which this article is based monitored articles published in the four weeks leading up to election day across twelve newspapers, comprising a mix of dailies and weekend editions, broadsheets and midmarket, and tabloid titles. The study concentrated on articles that had the election as the main story and which mentioned or sourced one or more candidates, both MPs seeking reelection, and Parliamentary Candidates. We were interested in exploring (any) differences in the news coverage of women and men candidates, looking at both frequency and content. Our findings suggest that women were much less likely to feature in news stories than men, even when controlling for Party Leader coverage. Women were much more likely to be mentioned or quoted in feature articles focused explicitly on gender issues, made interesting because of their sex and couture rather than their political abilities and experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1940161212457814

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of news frames that highlight female politicians' gender has been well documented internationally.

    “The presence of news frames that highlight female politicians’ gender has been well documented internationally (inter alia, Campbell and Childs 2010;Campus 2013;Falk 2013;Garcia-Blanco and Wahl-Jorgensen 2012;Heldman et al. 2005;Ross et al. 2013;Sreberny-Mohammadi and Ross 1996).”

    From Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns (2017) · cites this paper as Ross et al. 2013

  • At the 2010 general election, the explicit gender frame continued to highlight women's difference, ensuring that the role of politician continues to be codified as male.

    “At the 2010 general election, the explicit gender frame continued to highlight women’s difference, ensuring “that the role of politician continues to be codified as male” (Ross et al. 2013: 7).”

    From Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns (2017) · cites this paper as Ross et al. 2013

  • Ross et al. (2013) found that only 29 percent of national newspaper articles covering the British 2010 general election mentioned one or more females.

    “Ross et al. (2013) found that only 29 percent of national newspaper articles covering the British 2010 general election mentioned one or more females.”

    From Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns (2017) · cites this paper as Ross et al. 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1080/14680771003672254 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1057/bp.2010.17 · DOI
  3. Ayers Emma, Lawson Mark. 2011. A-Gendered Press. London: ECHO.
  4. 10.1177/0002764202238491 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Braden Maria. 1996. Women, Politicians and the Media. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
  6. 10.1177/00027640121958456 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/pa/gsi072 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/pa/gsq022 · DOI · Paper page
  9. CFWD (Centre for Women and Democracy). 2010. Election 2010: Where the Women Candidates Are. Leeds: Centre for Women and Democracy.
  10. 10.4324/9780203500668 · DOI
  11. 10.4324/9780203019443 · DOI
  12. Coles Joanna. 1997. “Boy Zone Story.” The Guardian, April 28.
  13. Comrie Margie. 2006. “The Media and Leadership.” In Political Leadership in New Zealand, edited by Miller Raymond, Mintrom Michael Auckland: Auckland University Press.
  14. 10.1017/S0007123403000164 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0008423903778767 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/10584600591006564 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/14616701003643996 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/2111340 · DOI
  19. 10.1086/269251 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/parlij/54.4.743 · DOI
  21. Lovenduski Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  22. McGregor Judy. 1996. “Gender Politics and the News: The Search for a Beehive Bimbo-Boadicea.” In Dangerous Democracy? News Media Politics in New Zealand, ed. McGregor Judy Palmerston North: Dunmore.
  23. Norris Pippa, ed. 1997a. Women, Media and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. Norris Pippa. 1997b. “Women Leaders Worldwide: A Splash of Color in the Photo Op.” In Women, Media and Politics, ed. Norris Pippa Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. North Louise. 2009. The Gendered Newsroom: How Journalists Experience the Changing World of Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  26. 10.1007/978-1-349-25311-1 · DOI
  27. Ross Karen. 2002. Women, Politics, Media: Uneasy Relations in Comparative Perspective. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  28. Ross Karen. 2009. Gendered Media: Women, Men and Identity Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  29. 10.1177/0163443711418272 · DOI
  30. Ross Karen, de Bruin Marjan, eds. 2004. Gender and Newsroom Practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  31. Short Clare. 1991. Dear Clare . . . This Is What Women Feel About Page 3. London: Radius.
  32. Sones Boni, Moran Margaret, Lovenduski Joni. 2005. Women in Parliament, the New Suffragettes. London: Politicos.
  33. Sreberny Annabelle, Van Zoonen Liesbet, eds. 2000. Gender, Politics and Communication. New York: Hampton Press.
  34. Stephenson Mary-Ann. 1998. The Glass Trapdoor: Women, Politics and the Media during the 1997 General Election. London: The Fawcett Society.
  35. 10.1007/978-1-137-10463-2 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-1-4039-4009-4 · DOI
  37. 10.5040/9798400632815.ch-006 · DOI
  38. WACC (World Association for Christian Communication). 2010. Who Makes The News? London: World Association for Christian Communication.
  39. Ward Lucy 2000. “Learning from the ‘Babe’ Experience: How the Finest Hour Became a Fiasco.” In New Gender Agenda, ed. Coote Anna London: IPPR.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ross, K., Evans, E., Harrison, L., Shears, M., & Wadia, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Kingston University London (GB)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Venue
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Published
2012-11-26
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
3-20
ISSN
  • 1040-1620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1612
  • 1940-1620
OpenAlex
W2015317231
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Press/Politics (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
Keywords
women politicians, 2010 British general election, women in politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review