The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Posting Facebook Status Updates Increase or Decrease Loneliness? An Online Social Networking Experiment
Open accessAbstract
Online social networking is a pervasive but empirically understudied phenomenon. Strong public opinions on its consequences exist but are backed up by little empirical evidence and almost no causally conclusive, experimental research. The current study tested the psychological effects of posting status updates on Facebook using an experimental design. For 1 week, participants in the experimental condition were asked to post more than they usually do, whereas participants in the control condition received no instructions. Participants added a lab “Research Profile” as a Facebook friend allowing for the objective documentation of protocol compliance, participants’ status updates, and friends’ responses. Results revealed (1) that the experimentally induced increase in status updating activity reduced loneliness, (2) that the decrease in loneliness was due to participants feeling more connected to their friends on a daily basis, and (3) that the effect of posting on loneliness was independent of direct social feedback (i.e., responses) by friends.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“some findings have suggested that SMU has negative implications for mental health when used passively (e.g., scrolling), but potentially improves well-being when used actively (e.g., posting, direct messaging; Deters and Mehl, 2013; Escobar-Viera et al., 2018; Frison and Eggermont, 2020).”
From Investigating the links between objective social media use, attentional control, and psychological distress (2024) · cites this paper as Deters and Mehl, 2013
In the citing paper
“By differentiating the two types of SM activities, prior research suggested that active use could be beneficial in terms of enhancing social connectedness, subjective well-being and reducing loneliness (21–23).”
From COVID-19 stress and addictive social media use (SMU): mediating role of active use and social media flow (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Screening for Depression in Well Older Adults: Evaluation of a Short Form of the CES-D
Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30622-6 · Cited by 5,403
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 4,426
A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006824100041 · Cited by 4,071
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. L. (2007) · doi:10.1145/1348549.1348556 · Cited by 2,662
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11421 · Cited by 2,575
Handbook of research methods in personality psychology
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-2315 · Cited by 2,381
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Gardner W., 2005, The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying, 227
- Köbler F., 2010, Paper presented at the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems
- LaRose R., 2001, Journal of Online Behavior, 1
- Madden M., 2010, Older adults and social media. Social networking use among those ages 50 and older nearly doubled over the past year
- McKenna K. Y. A., 2006, Computers phones, and the internet: Domesticating information technology, 279
- O’Neill N., 2010, Twitter nears Facebook’s daily status update volume
- Reis H. T., 1988, Handbook of personal relationships, 367
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–524 of 524
Stević, A., Wang, Y.-C., Vicente, D. D. S., Liu, X., & Hancock, J. T. (2025) · doi:10.71240/lcyc.345830
Lee, S. Y., Brown, S., Vergara‐Lopez, C., Mathis, K. J., Bock, B. C., Nugent, N. R., Parade, S. H., Tyrka, A. R., & Stroud, L. R. (2025) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-025-02962-8
姚, 宝. (2025) · Advances in Social Sciences · doi:10.12677/ass.2025.147601
Zhang, M., Zhao, Z., Lu, J., Liu, Y., & Li, Y. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6972535/v1
Şat, M. (2025) · e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.30900/kafkasegt.1691337
Fejes-Vékássy, L., Ujhelyi, A., Nyúl, B., & Engyel, M. (2025) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00564-5
Americans are becoming more socially isolated, but they’re not feeling lonelier
Konrath, S. (2018) · The Conversation · doi:10.64628/aai.ncqj3wq7c
Yang, S., Rau, P. P., & Cai, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/10803548.2026.2616176
Alhuzami, N. (2021) · International Journal of Humanities and Social Science · doi:10.30845/ijhss.v11n8p15
Loneliness and Social Connectedness in Mental Health
Bellomo, A., & Ventriglio, A. (2026) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00207640261427224
Battlelines of Accountability: The Discursive Production of Digital Responsibility
Baker, M., Free, C. W., & Gao, F. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06308-6
Nachit, O. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/d16ac442z566dz4348z85e5z8238bceefcd5
Social media use, loneliness and emotional distress among young people in Europe
d’Hombres, B., Kovačič, M., & Martínez, B. C. (2026) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2026.100621 · Cited by 2
Mental well-being and the use of social media
Balhara, Y. P. S., Ahluwalia, Y., Negi, D., & Vashisht, A. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-28842-5.00006-5
Ozimek, P., Spannenkrebs, A. H., Bohl, E., Rohmann, E., Hoffmann, D., & Bierhoff, H. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16091512
Hu, Q., Li, Q., Jing, X., & Chen, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6919242
UĞUR, O., & Çayköylü, A. (2026) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-026-08350-0
Social Media Use and Self-Objectification among Female Undergraduates
Hou, Q. (2026) · Advances in Management and Intelligent Technologies · doi:10.62177/amit.v2i4.1536
Zuo, L., Mao, J., Yang, L., Wang, H., & Xie, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1743687
Huang, J., & Hu, C. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2711018
Loneliness, Social Media and Coping Strategies: Lived Experiences of Emerging Adults
Banerjee, A., Chawla, S. K., & Kohli, N. (2026) · Psychology and Developing Societies · doi:10.1177/09713336261461904
Chen, D., Wang, Q., & Yan, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1930871
Connecting or Isolating: The Paradoxical Role of Social Media in Loneliness
Shukla, V., & Farooqi, S. R. (2026) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2026.2722367
Langlais, M. R., Seidman, G., & Matsuo, H. (2026) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2026.102451
Metadata
- Authors
- Deters, F. G., & Mehl, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deters, Fenne große
- Venue
- Social Psychological and Personality Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-12-20
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 579-586
- ISSN
- 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-5514
- PMC
- PMC3820167
- OpenAlex
- W2154975162
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 39.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (other-oa)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD069498)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- Facebook, status updates, loneliness, online social networking, social connectedness, social feedback, social media use, self-disclosure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
