The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limitations of PET-PEESE and Other Meta-Analysis Methods
Open accessAbstract
A novel meta-regression method, precision-effect test and precision-effect estimate with standard errors (PET-PEESE), predicts and explains recent high-profile failures to replicate in psychology. The central purpose of this article is to identify the limitations of PET-PEESE for application to social/personality psychology. Using typical conditions found in social/personality research, our simulations identify three areas of concern. PET-PEESE performs poorly in research areas where there are only a few studies, all studies use small samples, and where there is very high heterogeneity of results from study to study. Nonetheless, the statistical properties of conventional meta-analysis approaches are much worse than PET-PEESE under these same conditions. Our simulations suggest alterations to conventional research practice and ways to moderate PET-PEESE weaknesses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Overall, PET-PEESE has a low false positive rate, but its estimation of the effect size tends to be imprecise with a sample size of small, heterogeneous studies, resulting in large standard errors, such that 'if all studies are small, PET-PEESE has little power to identify a genuine empirical effect' (p. 590, Stanley, 2017)5.”
From Managing the terror of publication bias: A comprehensive p-curve analysis of the Terror Management Theory literature (2023) · cites this paper as Stanley, 2017
In the citing paper
“However, this counterintuitive finding may be explained by the fact that PET is prone to producing imprecise and biased estimates under high heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and a large proportion of p-hacking (Stanley & Doucouliagos, 2014; Stanley 2017; Carter et al., 2019).”
From Managing the terror of publication bias: A comprehensive p-curve analysis of the Terror Management Theory literature (2023) · cites this paper as Stanley 2017
In the citing paper
“However, when effects are highly heterogeneous and when sample sizes are small, the PET-PEESE analysis is known to yield imprecise estimates (Stanley & Doucouliagos, 2014; Stanley, 2017; Carter et al., 2019).”
From Managing the terror of publication bias: A comprehensive p-curve analysis of the Terror Management Theory literature (2023) · cites this paper as Stanley, 2017
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, its estimate should be interpreted with caution in small meta-analyses (with 20 studies or less; Stanley, 2017).”
From Please don't stop the music: A meta-analysis of the cognitive and academic benefits of instrumental musical training in childhood and adolescence (2022) · cites this paper as Stanley, 2017
In the citing paper
“Regarding the adjustment of the effect, the original PET-PEESE (which assumes independence) performed worse with smaller true effects and higher heterogeneity, consistently underestimating the true effect.”
From Please don't stop the music: A meta-analysis of the cognitive and academic benefits of instrumental musical training in childhood and adolescence (2022) · cites this paper as Stanley, 2017
In the citing paper
“There are two main threats to the validity of meta-analytic results: the systematic omission of studies (e.g., publication bias suppressing studies with null results36,37), and the flexible selection of analysis approaches within each study inflating the rate of false positives (e.g., p-hacking38).”
From Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 4×
“For decades, publication bias has been widely acknowledged to be a serious, yet intractable, problem for empirical science (Begg & Berlin, 1988; Glass et al., 1981; Hedges & Oklin, 1985; Rosenthal, 1979; Schmidt & Hunter, 2014; Sterling, 1959).”
InfluentialEstimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Science Collaboration (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac4716 · Cited by 8,515
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
Bhaskar, R. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203090732-9 · Cited by 7,765
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
Hutchison, T. W., & Popper, K. R. (1959) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2550489 · Cited by 7,629
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,289
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Greene W. E., 1990, Econometric analysis
- Johnson N., 1970, Distributions in statistics: Continuous univariate distribution
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on.
Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L., & Suls, J. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000127 · Cited by 808
Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills.
Bediou, B., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., Tipton, E., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000130 · Cited by 807
Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods
Carter, E. C., Schönbrodt, F. D., Gervais, W. M., & Hilgard, J. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245919847196 · Cited by 588
Methods for testing publication bias in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses
Nakagawa, S., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D., Koricheva, J., Noble, D. W. A., Parker, T. H., Sánchez‐Tójar, A., Yang, Y., & O'Dea, R. E. (2022) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13724 · Cited by 399
Physical activity and subjective well-being in healthy individuals: a meta-analytic review
Buecker, S., Simacek, T., Ingwersen, B., Terwiel, S., & Simonsmeier, B. A. (2021) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1760728 · Cited by 374
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215052 · Cited by 365
Risk factors for child sexual abuse victimization: A meta-analytic review.
Assink, M., van der Put, C. E., Meeuwsen, M. W. C. M., de Jong, N. M., Oort, F. J., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Hoeve, M. (2019) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000188 · Cited by 322
What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
Stanley, T. D., Carter, E. C., & Doucouliagos, H. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000169 · Cited by 307
Self-citationCognitive Training Does Not Enhance General Cognition
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.004 · Cited by 303
The impact of shared book reading on children's language skills: A meta-analysis
Noble, C. H., Sala, G., Peter, M., Lingwood, J., Rowland, C. F., Gobet, F. R., & Pine, J. M. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100290 · Cited by 326
Transfer of test- enhanced learning: meta-analytic review and synthesis
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000151 · Cited by 286
Is bilingualism related to a cognitive advantage in children? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gunnerud, H. L., ten Braak, D., Reikerås, E. K. L., Donolato, E., & Melby‐Lervåg, M. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000301 · Cited by 330
Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects
Kvarven, A., Strømland, E., & Johannesson, M. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0787-z · Cited by 271
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30073-5 · Cited by 270
Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01060-2 · Cited by 235
Coles, N. A., Larsen, J. T., & Lench, H. C. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000194 · Cited by 255
Trait mindfulness and health behaviours: a meta-analysis
Sala, M., Rochefort, C., Lui, P. P., & Baldwin, A. S. (2020) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1650290 · Cited by 199
Afonso, J. R., Ramírez‐Campillo, R., Clemente, F. M., Büttner, F., & Andrade, R. (2023) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-023-01927-9 · Cited by 225
Dekkers, T. J., van Rentergem, J. A. A., Meijer, B., Popma, A., Wagemaker, E., & Huizenga, H. M. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.004 · Cited by 152
A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration
Coles, N. A., March, D. S., Marmolejo‐Ramos, F., Larsen, J. T., Arinze, N. C., Ndukaihe, I. L. G., Willis, M. L., Foroni, F., Reggev, N., Mokady, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01458-9 · Cited by 170
Bartos̆, F., Maier, M., Wagenmakers, E., Doucouliagos, H., & Stanley, T. D. (2022) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1594 · Cited by 156
Self-citationSteel, P., Beugelsdijk, S., & Aguinis, H. (2021) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00385-z · Cited by 152
Bierwiaczonek, K., & Kunst, J. R. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211006432 · Cited by 159
Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? A systematic review & meta-analysis
Dear, K., Dutton, K., & Fox, E. (2019) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.006 · Cited by 143
Ironic Effects of Thought Suppression: A Meta-Analysis
Wang, D., Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619898795 · Cited by 136
The cognitive and academic benefits of Cogmed: A meta-analysis
Aksayli, N. D., Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.003 · Cited by 123
“If PET suggests the presence of a real effect (i.e., intercept different from zero; p < .100, one-tailed), the PEESE estimator must be preferred over the PET estimator (Stanley, 2017; Stanley & Doucouliagos, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodRomán-Caballero, R., Vadillo, M. A., Trainor, L. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100436 · Cited by 118
Does democracy cause growth? A meta-analysis (of 2000 regressions)
Colagrossi, M., Rossignoli, D., & Maggioni, M. A. (2019) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.101824 · Cited by 133
Bartos̆, F., Maier, M., Quintana, D. S., & Wagenmakers, E. (2022) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459221109259 · Cited by 122
Sella, E., Miola, L., Toffalini, E., & Borella, E. (2021) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2021.1974309 · Cited by 107
Meta-Analysis of Present-Bias Estimation using Convex Time Budgets
Imai, T., Rutter, T. A., & Camerer, C. F. (2020) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/ueaa115 · Cited by 103
Music Training and Nonmusical Abilities
Schellenberg, E. G., & Lima, C. F. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-032323-051354 · Cited by 107
van den Akker, O. R., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Vugt, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2020.102329 · Cited by 90
Educational gender gaps and economic growth: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis
Minasyan, A., Zenker, J., Klasen, S., & Vollmer, S. (2019) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.006 · Cited by 87
When is narcissism associated with low empathy? A meta-analytic review
Urbonaviciute, G., & Hepper, E. G. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104036 · Cited by 97
Meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control
Schroeder, P. A., Schwippel, T., Wolz, I., & Svaldi, J. (2020) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.05.006 · Cited by 85
Detecting publication selection bias through excess statistical significance
Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Carter, E. C. (2021) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1512 · Cited by 83
Self-citationEffects of action video game play on cognitive skills: A meta-analysis.
Bediou, B., Rodgers, M. A., Tipton, E., Mayer, R. E., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2023) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000102 · Cited by 112
Yang, Y., Sánchez‐Tójar, A., O’Dea, R. E., Noble, D. W. A., Koricheva, J., Jennions, M. D., Parker, T. H., Lagisz, M., & Nakagawa, S. (2023) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y · Cited by 111
Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation
van Aert, R. C. M. (2023) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1654 · Cited by 82
The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Chronic Ankle Instability
Leicht, A. S. B., Howard, J. S., van Werkhoven, H., McBride, J. M., & Needle, A. R. (2019) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002129 · Cited by 79
Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size.
Olsson-Collentine, A., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000294 · Cited by 81
Neves, L., Correia, A. I., Castro, S. L., Martins, D., & Lima, C. F. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104777 · Cited by 86
Physical activity and cortisol regulation: A meta-analysis
Moyers, S. A., & Hagger, M. S. (2023) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108548 · Cited by 89
Pottier, P., Burke, S., Drobniak, S. M., Lagisz, M., & Nakagawa, S. (2021) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13899 · Cited by 74
Kunst, J. R. (2021) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.08.003 · Cited by 66
Child physical abuse risk factors: A systematic review and a meta-analysis
Milner, J. S., Crouch, J. L., McCarthy, R. J., Ammar, J., Dominguez-Martinez, R., Thomas, C. L., & Jensen, A. P. (2022) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2022.101778 · Cited by 75
Sala, G., Aksayli, N. D., Tatlidil, K. S., Gondo, Y., & Gobet, F. (2019) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101386 · Cited by 72
Nitschke, F., McKimmie, B. M., & Vanman, E. J. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000206 · Cited by 71
How to Detect Publication Bias in Psychological Research
Renkewitz, F., & Keiner, M. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000386 · Cited by 62
Donald, J. N., Bradshaw, E. L., Conigrave, J. H., Parker, P. D., Byatt, L. L., Noetel, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000338 · Cited by 61
Nylén‐Eriksen, M., Stojiljkovic, M., Lillekroken, D., Lindeflaten, K., Hessevaagbakke, E., Flølo, T. N., Hovland, O. J., Solberg, A. S., Hansen, S., Bjørnnes, A. K., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06531-7 · Cited by 55
Cultivation and social media: A meta-analysis
Hermann, E., Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. E. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231180257 · Cited by 78
Digital mental health interventions for the treatment of depression: A multiverse meta-analysis
Plessen, C. Y., Panagiotopoulou, O. M., Tong, L., Cuijpers, P., & Karyotaki, E. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.018 · Cited by 53
Siegel, M., Eder, J. S. N., Wicherts, J. M., & Pietschnig, J. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000991 · Cited by 65
Sleep spindles and general cognitive ability – A meta-analysis
Ujma, P. P. (2018) · Sleep Spindles & Cortical Up States · doi:10.1556/2053.2.2018.01 · Cited by 49
Emotion regulation and mental health across cultures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chen, S., Cai, Q., Omari, D. I., Sanghvi, D. E., Lyu, S., & Bonanno, G. A. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02168-8 · Cited by 61
Suicidality among individuals with gambling problems: A meta-analytic literature review.
Kristensen, J. H., Pallesen, S., Bauer, J., Leino, T. M., Griffiths, M. D., & Erevik, E. K. (2023) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000411 · Cited by 63
Television, Continuity, and Change: A Meta-Analysis of Five Decades of Cultivation Research
Hermann, E., Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. E. (2021) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqab014 · Cited by 62
Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis
Genschow, O., Cracco, E., Schneider, J., Protzko, J., Wisniewski, D., Braß, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683221087527 · Cited by 63
Quantitative Political Science Research Is Greatly Underpowered
Arel‐Bundock, V., Briggs, R. C., Doucouliagos, H., Aviña, M. M., & Stanley, T. D. (2024) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/734279 · Cited by 54
Self-citationPietschnig, J., Siegel, M., Eder, J. S. N., & Gittler, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02874 · Cited by 52
How identity fusion predicts extreme pro-group orientations: A meta-analysis
Varmann, A. H., Kruse, L., Bierwiaczonek, K., Gómez, Á., Vázquez, A., & Kunst, J. R. (2023) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2023.2190267 · Cited by 54
Using Monte Carlo experiments to select meta‐analytic estimators
Hong, S., & Reed, W. R. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1467 · Cited by 43
Taylor, G., Sala, G., Kołak, J., Gerhardstein, P. C., & Lingwood, J. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100614 · Cited by 70
Olfactory perception and blindness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Karwowski, M., Larsson, M. U., & Hummel, T. R. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1035-2 · Cited by 48
Resting Frontal Eeg Asymmetry and Personality Traits: A Meta–Analysis
Kuper, N., Käckenmester, W., & Wacker, J. (2019) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2197 · Cited by 49
Has the evidence for moral licensing been inflated by publication bias?
Kuper, N., & Bott, A. (2019) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2018.878 · Cited by 30
Meta-analysis of the reduced relative feedback frequency effect on motor learning and performance
McKay, B., Hussien, J., Vinh, M.-A., Mir-Orefice, A., Brooks, H., & Ste‐Marie, D. M. (2022) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102165 · Cited by 37
The Wages of Mothers' Labor: A Meta‐Regression Analysis
Leonard, M. D. L., & Stanley, T. D. (2020) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.12693 · Cited by 41
Self-citationBerezowski, L., Ludwig, L., Martin, A., Löwe, B., & Mora, M. C. S. (2021) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000001011 · Cited by 44
Examining the Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Preliminary ReportPreprint
Lakens, D., Page‐Gould, E., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Spellman, B., Schönbrodt, F. D., Hasselman, F., Corker, K. S., Grange, J., Sharples, A. E., Cavender, C., et al. (2017) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/xfbjf · Cited by 39
How robust is our cumulative knowledge on turnover?
Field, J. G., Bosco, F. A., & Kepes, S. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09687-3 · Cited by 38
Toffalini, E., Giofrè, D., Pastore, M., Carretti, B., Fraccadori, F., & Szűcs, D. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01549-x · Cited by 47
Beyond Random Effects: When Small-Study Findings Are More Heterogeneous
Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2022) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459221120427 · Cited by 36
Self-citationChang, D. F., Donald, J. N., Whitney, J. M., Miao, I. Y., & Sahdra, B. K. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231178518 · Cited by 35
Donolato, E., Toffalini, E., Rogde, K., Nordahl‐Hansen, A., Lervåg, A., Norbury, C., & Melby‐Lervåg, M. (2023) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1368 · Cited by 66
Reinforcement Learning in Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Riedmann, A., Schäper, P., & Lugrin, B. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00494-6 · Cited by 46
Implications of the open science era for educational psychology research syntheses
Patall, E. A. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2021.1897009 · Cited by 37
Miroshnik, K. G., Forthmann, B., Karwowski, M., & Benedek, M. (2023) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2023.101739 · Cited by 33
Meta-Analysis of Present-Bias Estimation Using Convex Time Budgets
Imai, T., Rutter, T., & Camerer, C. F. (2019) · Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.69188 · Cited by 30
A meta‐regression analysis on the willingness‐to‐pay for country‐of‐origin labelling
Yeh, C., & Hirsch, S. (2023) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12528 · Cited by 36
Sella, E., Carbone, E., Vincenzi, M., Toffalini, E., & Borella, E. (2022) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2022.2122931 · Cited by 27
Retrospective median power, false positive meta‐analysis and large‐scale replication
Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2021) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1529 · Cited by 31
Self-citationStudying abroad and earnings: A meta‐analysis
Pietro, G. D., European Commission, & IZA (2021) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12472 · Cited by 33
Inflation targeting: Genuine effects or publication selection bias?
Balima, H. W., Kilama, E. G., & Tapsoba, R. (2020) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103520 · Cited by 26
Self-efficacy in gifted and non-gifted students: A multilevel meta-analysis
Alabbasi, A. M. A., Sultan, Z. M., Karwowski, M., Cross, T. L., & Ayoub, A. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112244 · Cited by 26
Maier, M., Bartos̆, F., Oh, M., Wagenmakers, E., Shanks, D. R., & Harris, A. J. L. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/r8nyu · Cited by 28
Does Digital Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? A Meta-Analysis
da Costa, L. P., Bierwiaczonek, K., & Bianchi, M. (2024) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2023.0591 · Cited by 30
THE EURO'S TRADE EFFECT: A META‐ANALYSIS
Polák, P. (2018) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12264 · Cited by 24
Kibuka, M., Price, A. I., Onakpoya, I., Tierney, S., & Clarke, M. J. (2021) · European Journal of Midwifery · doi:10.18332/ejm/142781 · Cited by 36
A meta‐analysis on the effects of just‐below versus round prices
Troll, E. S., Frankenbach, J., Friese, M., & Loschelder, D. D. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1353 · Cited by 26
Silver, A. M., Alvarez-Vargas, D., Bailey, D. H., & Libertus, M. E. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105920 · Cited by 28
Xie, L., Chen, J., Dai, J., Zhang, W., Chen, L., Jian, S., Gao, X., Song, J., & Shen, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2024.1435011 · Cited by 23
Silva, C. L. M., de Moraes, C. E. F., da Veiga, G. V., da Luz, F. D., Pompeu, A., Nazar, B. P., Coutinho, E. S. F., Hay, P., & Appolinário, J. C. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105176 · Cited by 17
P ‐hacking in meta‐analyses: A formalization and new meta‐analytic methods
Mathur, M. B. (2024) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1701 · Cited by 25
Zerna, J., Strobel, A., & Strobel, A. (2024) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.92885 · Cited by 22
A systematic review and meta-analysis of vineyard techniques used to delay ripening
Previtali, P., Giorgini, F., Mullen, R. S., Dokoozlian, N., Wilkinson, K. L., & Ford, C. M. (2022) · Horticulture Research · doi:10.1093/hr/uhac118 · Cited by 22
Skating on Thin Evidence: Implications for Public Policy
Doucouliagos, H., Paldam, M., & Stanley, T. D. (2018) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.03.004 · Cited by 23
Self-citationXará-Leite, F., Andrade, R., Moreira, P. S., Coutinho, L., Ayeni, O. R., Sevivas, N., & Espregueira‐Mendes, J. (2019) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05408-3 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanley, T. D.
- Affiliations
- Hendrix College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stanley, T. D.
- ORCID
- Stanley, T. D.
- Venue
- Social Psychological and Personality Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-02-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 581-591
- ISSN
- 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2591641564
- Semantic Scholar
- 62d9746bdeace29af787162583753de042a82d8a
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 17.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- meta-regression, replication failure, small sample bias, effect size heterogeneity, meta-analysis limitations, social-personality psychology, simulation study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
