Cited by 37Multisensory perception and integrationColor perception and designCategorization, perception, and language

Using Single Colors and Color Pairs to Communicate Basic Tastes II: Foreground–Background Color Combinations

Open access
Woods, Andy T., Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando, Velasco, Carlos, Spence, Charles·2016·i-Perception

Abstract

People associate basic tastes (e.g., sweet, sour, bitter, and salty) with specific colors (e.g., pink or red, green or yellow, black or purple, and white or blue). In the present study, we investigated whether a color bordered by another color (either the same or different) would give rise to stronger taste associations relative to a single patch of color. We replicate previous findings, highlighting the existence of a robust crossmodal correspondence between individual colors and basic tastes. On occasion, color pairs were found to communicate taste expectations more consistently than were single color patches. Furthermore, and in contrast to a recent study in which the color pairs were shown side-by-side, participants took no longer to match the color pairs with tastes than the single colors (they had taken twice as long to respond to the color pairs in the previous study). Possible reasons for these results are discussed, and potential applications for the results, and for the testing methodology developed, are outlined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2041669516663750

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of pink and white is rated significantly sweeter than white and pink represented individually as single colours.

    “Woods et al [58] examined how single colours compared to colour combinations were rated in terms of sweetness, and found that the combination of pink and white was rated significantly sweeter than white and pink represented individually as single colours.”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [58]

    Experiment 2’s Methods include pink–white combinations and a pink-only patch among the sweet-taste stimuli, and its Results report significant differences among the sweet-taste patches. But the Results do not establish that pink–white was rated significantly sweeter than either pink or white alone; white alone was not among the sweet-taste stimuli in Experiment 2. Experiment 1 instead identifies pink–purple as a combination more consistently linked with sweetness than its constituent colors. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pairwise combinations of colours have stronger associations with sweetness compared to single colours.

    “Woods et al. [58] found that the pairwise combinations of colours had stronger associations with sweetness as compared to single colours.”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [58]

    Experiment 1’s Results and Discussion report that some colour pairs, specifically pink–purple and purple–white, were more consistently linked with sweetness than their constituent single colours. The citing sentence omits the qualification that this was true of some pairs, not colour pairs generally. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woods, A. T., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Velasco, C., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Gösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden
Corresponding author
Woods, Andy T.
Venue
i-Perception
Published
2016-09-20
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
2041669516663750-2041669516663750
ISSN
2041-6695 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2522544708
Cited by
37
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • i-Perception (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L007053/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
cross-modal correspondence, basic taste, taste expectations, color patches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review