When companionship becomes dependence: Replika, emotional AI, and strategic boundaries in the AI companion economy
Abstract
This teaching case examines Replika, an AI companion platform developed by Luka Inc., and the strategic dilemma faced by founder and Chief Executive Officer Eugenia Kuyda in late 2025 as increasing regulatory and societal scrutiny challenged the company’s emotionally immersive engagement model. Replika differentiated itself through persistent one-to-one conversational relationships that fostered emotional continuity and drove subscription-based revenue growth. However, rising concerns regarding emotional dependency, prolonged engagement, and the substitution of human relationships by AI companions created mounting pressure for the company to reconsider the boundaries of its platform design. The case places Kuyda at a critical strategic crossroads: should Replika continue prioritizing deep emotional immersion as its primary competitive advantage, introduce clearer relational safeguards to align with emerging legitimacy expectations, or reposition the platform toward a less immersive form of AI-supported interaction? Situated within the rapidly evolving AI companion industry, the case provides rich material to explore platform governance, stakeholder legitimacy, business model dependence, strategic trade-offs, and long-term positioning under conditions of technological uncertainty and emerging regulation. The case is intended for postgraduate courses in strategic management, digital platform strategy, artificial intelligence governance, technology management, and executive education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903 · see citing works
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676 · see citing works
Supportive? Addictive? Abusive? How AI companions affect our mental health
Adam, D. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01349-9 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- ABC News (2023) Replika Users Fell in Love With Their AI Chatbot Companions. Then They Lost Them. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-03-01/replika-users-fell-in-love-with-their-ai-chatbot-companion/102028196
- Andoh E (2026) AI chatbots and digital companions are reshaping emotional connection. Monitor on Psychology 57(1): 60. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2026/01-02/trends-digital-ai-relationships-emotional-connection
- European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — artificial intelligence act. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689
- Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
- McKinsey & Company (2023) The State of AI in 2023: Generative Ai’s Breakout Year. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai
- Turkle S (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other. Basic Books. https://www.mediastudies.asia/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Sherry_Turkle_Alone_Together.pdf
- Authors
- Menghani, K., Guttena, R. K., Kannan, H., Rodriguez, R. V., & Tema Atmaja, F.
- Affiliations
- Woxsen School of Business (IN)
- University of Bengkulu
- Venue
- Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2026-07-22
- ISSN
- 2043-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7170057844
- Semantic Scholar
- 561cf9a87a8bd11e642a7b352ad450eb178e87d6
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Keywords
- Replika, AI companions, affective computing, emotional dependence, platform governance, stakeholder legitimacy, strategic trade-offs, AI regulation, conversational AI, human-AI relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review