Cited by 0Digital Platforms and EconomicsEthics and Social Impacts of AIAI in Service Interactions

When companionship becomes dependence: Replika, emotional AI, and strategic boundaries in the AI companion economy

Menghani, Kiran, Guttena, Revanth Kumar, Kannan, Hemachandran, Rodriguez, Raul Villamarin, Tema Atmaja, Ferry·2026·Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases

Abstract

This teaching case examines Replika, an AI companion platform developed by Luka Inc., and the strategic dilemma faced by founder and Chief Executive Officer Eugenia Kuyda in late 2025 as increasing regulatory and societal scrutiny challenged the company’s emotionally immersive engagement model. Replika differentiated itself through persistent one-to-one conversational relationships that fostered emotional continuity and drove subscription-based revenue growth. However, rising concerns regarding emotional dependency, prolonged engagement, and the substitution of human relationships by AI companions created mounting pressure for the company to reconsider the boundaries of its platform design. The case places Kuyda at a critical strategic crossroads: should Replika continue prioritizing deep emotional immersion as its primary competitive advantage, introduce clearer relational safeguards to align with emerging legitimacy expectations, or reposition the platform toward a less immersive form of AI-supported interaction? Situated within the rapidly evolving AI companion industry, the case provides rich material to explore platform governance, stakeholder legitimacy, business model dependence, strategic trade-offs, and long-term positioning under conditions of technological uncertainty and emerging regulation. The case is intended for postgraduate courses in strategic management, digital platform strategy, artificial intelligence governance, technology management, and executive education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20438869261470446

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. ABC News (2023) Replika Users Fell in Love With Their AI Chatbot Companions. Then They Lost Them. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-03-01/replika-users-fell-in-love-with-their-ai-chatbot-companion/102028196
  2. Andoh E (2026) AI chatbots and digital companions are reshaping emotional connection. Monitor on Psychology 57(1): 60. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2026/01-02/trends-digital-ai-relationships-emotional-connection
  3. European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — artificial intelligence act. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689
  4. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
  5. McKinsey & Company (2023) The State of AI in 2023: Generative Ai’s Breakout Year. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai
  6. Turkle S (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other. Basic Books. https://www.mediastudies.asia/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Sherry_Turkle_Alone_Together.pdf

Authors
Menghani, K., Guttena, R. K., Kannan, H., Rodriguez, R. V., & Tema Atmaja, F.
Affiliations
  • Woxsen School of Business (IN)
  • University of Bengkulu
Venue
Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases
Published
2026-07-22
ISSN
2043-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7170057844
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
Replika, AI companions, affective computing, emotional dependence, platform governance, stakeholder legitimacy, strategic trade-offs, AI regulation, conversational AI, human-AI relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review