On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Open accessAbstract
AI is undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of models (e.g., BERT, DALL-E, GPT-3) that are trained on broad data at scale and are adaptable to a wide range of downstream tasks. We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models, ranging from their capabilities (e.g., language, vision, robotics, reasoning, human interaction) and technical principles(e.g., model architectures, training procedures, data, systems, security, evaluation, theory) to their applications (e.g., law, healthcare, education) and societal impact (e.g., inequity, misuse, economic and environmental impact, legal and ethical considerations). Though foundation models are based on standard deep learning and transfer learning, their scale results in new emergent capabilities,and their effectiveness across so many tasks incentivizes homogenization. Homogenization provides powerful leverage but demands caution, as the defects of the foundation model are inherited by all the adapted models downstream. Despite the impending widespread deployment of foundation models, we currently lack a clear understanding of how they work, when they fail, and what they are even capable of due to their emergent properties. To tackle these questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will require deep interdisciplinary collaboration commensurate with their fundamentally sociotechnical nature.
Verified 2026-10-06 · 8 references not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).
TL;DR
This report from Stanford's Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM) surveys the emerging paradigm of "foundation models" — models trained on broad data with self-supervision that can be adapted to many downstream tasks — and argues their significance lies in two properties: emergence and homogenization. It maps opportunities and risks across capabilities, applications, technology, and society, concluding that foundation models are poorly understood and that deep interdisciplinary collaboration is needed to derisk them.
Key findings
- Foundation models are defined as models trained on broad data (generally self-supervised at scale) that can be adapted to a wide range of downstream tasks; examples cited include BERT, GPT-3, and CLIP. GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters versus GPT-2's 1.5 billion, and permits in-context learning as an emergent property "neither specifically trained for nor anticipated to arise."
- Homogenization provides leverage but creates single points of failure: "any flaws in the model are blindly inherited by all adapted models," and almost all state-of-the-art NLP models are now adapted from one of a few foundation models (BERT, RoBERTa, BART, T5).
- Scale required three ingredients: GPU throughput and memory increased 10× over the last four years; the Transformer architecture; and more training data. Google search, with 4 billion users, now depends on BERT as one of its signals.
- Domain-specific figures cited: healthcare expenditures account for 17% of US GDP and ~30% of healthcare spending may be wasteful; drug development typically takes over 10 years and costs more than one billion dollars; 80% of clinical trials fail; the US has over 1.3M lawyers and legal services revenues exceed $300B, yet ~86% of low-income individuals with civil legal problems report inadequate or no legal help; US student private education debt has reached $1.6 trillion.
- On language: there are over 6,000 languages in the world, but multilingual foundation models to date (mBERT, mT5, XLM-R) are each trained on around 100 languages; Fula has over 65 million speakers but few if any NLP resources. An adapted foundation model scored 91.6% on the NY Regents 8th grade science exam in 2019, versus 73.1% for the best 2018 pre-foundation-model system.
- On law, a GPT-3 exchange shows the model failing to infer that $1M in liquidated damages for a Toyota Corolla is exorbitant, even when given the rule and its application in the prompt.
Methods
- This is a survey/report, not an empirical study. It was written by over 100 people from different backgrounds at Stanford, organized into 26 sections grouped into four parts: capabilities, applications, technology, and society.
- A large part of the report is a survey of existing work, unified through many discussions to highlight interdisciplinary connections; the authors describe the writing itself as "an experiment."
- Sections cover capabilities (language, vision, robotics, reasoning and search, interaction, philosophy of understanding), applications (healthcare/biomedicine, law, education), technology (modeling, training, adaptation, evaluation, systems, data, security and privacy, robustness, AI safety and alignment, theory, interpretability), and society (inequity and fairness, misuse, environment, legality, economics, ethics of scale).
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: the report "will inevitably be incomplete, especially as the field evolves quickly"; many applications (e.g., natural sciences, music, finance, agriculture) are not included though they are as likely to be affected; and "not all the views expressed in this report are held by all the authors."
- Stated by the paper: existing foundation models are "very much research prototypes that are poorly understood," with a lack of agreement on basic questions such as when models are "safe" to release; the authors note we "cannot characterize whether the foundation is trustworthy or not."
- Evident from the text: the report is a broad, non-systematic survey rather than a study with a defined sample or analysis protocol, so its claims are largely qualitative and forward-looking rather than empirically tested within the document itself.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 381 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models have shown promising results for standard vision tasks like image classification and object detection.
“These models have shown promising results for standard tasks in the field, like image classification and object detection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Big tech companies are on a completely different level in resources than startups and academia, especially in infrastructure, users, and data from market position.
“big tech companies are on a completely different level in terms of resources, especially in terms of the infrastructure, users, and data that come from their market position”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models are on the rise in computer vision.
“Now, pretraining on web-scale raw data instead of curated datasets, foundation models are on the rise in computer vision [e.g., Radford et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Adapting a foundation model trained on a broad range of unlabeled data improves the robustness of adapted models across a wide variety of shifts.
“Existing work shows that adapting a foundation model trained on a broad range of unlabeled data improves the robustness of adapted models across a wide variety of shifts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Current training of foundation models uses modality-specific objectives that are often chosen heuristically.
“The current status quo for training foundation models involves modality-specific objectives (e.g., masked language modeling [Devlin et al. 2019] for text and SimCLR [Chen et al. 2020c] for images) that are often chosen heuristically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chen et al. 2020c
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 64 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The model is unable to infer that $1M for a Toyota Corolla is exorbitant.
“The model is unable to infer that $1M for a Toyota Corolla is exorbitant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 64 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Even if the model is provided with both the abstract rule and its precise translation to the context in the prompt, GPT-3 is still unable to conduct the logical reasoning required.
“Even if the model is provided with both the abstract rule and its precise translation to the context in the prompt — and the application should thus be trivial — GPT-3 is still unable to conduct the logical reasoning required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Current foundation models have struggled with long contexts and outputs.
“Current foundation models have struggled with such long contexts and outputs (see §4.1: modeling for more discussion).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites §4.1
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
In-context learning is an emergent property that was neither specifically trained for nor anticipated to arise.
“an emergent property that was neither specifically trained for nor anticipated to arise”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Homogenization is a liability because all AI systems might inherit the same problematic biases of a few foundation models.
“it is also a liability; all AI systems might inherit the same problematic biases of a few foundation models [Bolukbasi et al. 2016; Caliskan et al. 2017; Abid et al. 2021, inter alia]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bolukbasi et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Caliskan et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Abid et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
We also see the homogenization of actual models across research communities in the form of multimodal models.
“Besides the homogenization of approaches, we also see the homogenization of actual models across research communities in the form of multimodal models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Luo et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kim et al. 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cho et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ Abstract
The scale of foundation models results in new emergent capabilities.
“their scale results in new emergent capabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Homogenization produces extremely high leverage because any improvements in the foundation models can lead to immediate benefits across all of NLP.
“While this homogenization produces extremely high leverage (any improvements in the foundation models can lead to immediate benefits across all of NLP)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
We are beginning to see a homogenization across research communities.
“We are also beginning to see a homogenization across research communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Similar Transformer-based sequence modeling approaches are now applied to text, images, speech, tabular data, protein sequences, organic molecules, and reinforcement learning.
“similar Transformer-based sequence modeling approaches are now applied to text [Devlin et al. 2019; Radford et al. 2019; Raffel et al. 2019], images [Dosovitskiy et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2020d], speech [Liu et al. 2020d], tabular data [Yin et al. 2020], protein sequences [Rives et al. 2021], organic molecules [Rothchild et al. 2021], and reinforcement learning [Chen et al. 2021b; Janner et al. 202”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Radford et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Raffel et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models have led to surprising emergence which results from scale.
“Foundation models have also led to surprising emergence which results from scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The gap between private models that industry can train and open community foundation models will likely remain large if not grow.
“the gap between the private models that industry can train and the ones that are open to the community will likely remain large if not grow”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The tech industry has little incentive to devote significant resources to technologies designed for improving the condition of poor and marginalized people.
“the tech industry has little incentive to devote significant resources to technologies designed for improving the condition of poor and marginalized people [Reich et al. 2021]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reich et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Commercial incentives can also lead to market failures and underinvestment in domains where shareholders are unable to capture the value of innovation.
“However, commercial incentives can also lead to market failures and underinvestment in domains where shareholders are unable to capture the value of innovation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The direct social impact of foundation models is through the actual deployment of these models, which is governed by proprietary practices on often private data.
“the direct social impact is through the actual deployment of these models, which is governed by proprietary practices on often private data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models offer the possibility of closing the reasoning/search gap due to their multi-purpose nature and generative and multimodal capabilities.
“Foundation models offer the possibility of closing this gap: their multi-purpose nature along with their strong generative and multimodal capabilities offer new leverage for controlling the combinatorial explosion inherent to search.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 6 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Existing foundation models are hard to understand.
“existing foundation models are hard to understand”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 12 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Volunteer computing for training foundation models is an open technical challenge due to high latency and high bandwidth requirements.
“The high latency connections between nodes and the high bandwidth requirements for training foundation models make this an open technical challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Commercial incentives can lead companies to ignore social externalities such as the technological displacement of labor, the health of an informational ecosystem required for democracy, the environmental cost of computing resources, and the profit-driven sale of technologies to non-democratic regimes.
“commercial incentives can lead companies to ignore social externalities [Acemoglu 2021; Reich et al. 2021] such as the technological displacement of labor, the health of an informational ecosystem required for democracy, the environmental cost of computing resources, and the profit-driven sale of technologies to non-democratic regimes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Acemoglu 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reich et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Robotics faces fundamental challenges due to being anchored to the physical world.
“robotics faces fundamental challenges due to being anchored to the physical world”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
AlphaGo has shown that deep neural networks can be effective in guiding the search space.
“existing work such as AlphaGo have already shown that deep neural networks can be effective in guiding the search space”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Google search, which boasts 4 billion users, now depends on foundation models like BERT as one of its signals.
“Google search, which boasts 4 billion users, now depends on foundation models like BERT [Devlin et al. 2019] as one of its signals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Humans operate intuitively even in the most mathematical domains.
“humans are known to operate intuitively even in the most mathematical of domains [Lakoff and Núñez 2000]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lakoff and Núñez 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models start to roll back the positive trend of increased reproducibility and open science.
“Foundation models start to roll back this positive trend.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
While trained models may be available (e.g., BERT), the actual training of foundation models is unavailable to the vast majority of AI researchers, due to the much higher computational cost and the complex engineering requirements.
“While trained models may be available (e.g., BERT), the actual training of foundation models is unavailable to the vast majority of AI researchers, due to the much higher computational cost and the complex engineering requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Research on building foundation models themselves has occurred almost exclusively in industry - big tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Microsoft, or Huawei, or startups such as OpenAI or AI21 Labs, though AI2 is a notable exception.
“research on building foundation models themselves has occurred almost exclusively in industry — big tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Microsoft, or Huawei, or startups such as OpenAI or AI21 Labs, though AI2 is a notable exception [Peters et al. 2018; Zellers et al. 2019b].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Peters et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zellers et al. 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The principal challenge in developing foundation models for robotics is acquiring sufficient data of the right form conducive to learning.
“The principal challenge in developing new types of foundation models for robotics — different in nature than their language and vision counterparts — is acquiring sufficient data of the right form that is conducive to learning”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 6 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Existing foundation models have unexpected failure modes.
“they have unexpected failure modes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The political economy in which foundation models are designed, developed, and deployed provides an inevitable incentive structure for decision-making at every stage.
“The political economy in which foundations models are designed, developed, and deployed provides an inevitable incentive structure for decision-making at every stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The barrier to entry for developing foundation models will continue to rise, making it difficult for even startups to compete.
“The fundamental centralizing nature of foundation models means that the barrier to entry for developing them will continue to rise, so that even startups, despite their agility, will find it difficult to compete”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Radinsky 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Non-experts have difficulty distinguishing short-form English text written by GPT-3 from human-written text.
“Clark et al. [2021] demonstrate that non-experts have difficulty distinguishing short-form English text that was written by GPT-3 from that written by humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clark et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Existing work demonstrates a variety of security vulnerabilities and privacy risks for foundation models.
“existing work demonstrates a variety of security vulnerabilities (e.g., adversarial triggers to generate undesirable outputs) or privacy risks (e.g., memorization of training data) for these models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The nature of foundation models introduces new challenges for interpretability research.
“the nature of foundation models (i.e., the wide array of tasks these models are beneficial for and the unexpected emergent properties they acquire) introduces new challenges for interpretability research”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The most impactful feature of foundation models in NLP is their generality and adaptability, not their raw generation abilities.
“However, the feature of foundation models that has been most impactful in NLP is not their raw generation abilities but their surprising generality and adaptability: a single foundation model can be adapted in different ways in order to achieve many linguistic tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The theory of standard supervised learning is inadequate to fully explain foundation models.
“the theory of standard supervised learning, while relatively mature, is inadequate to fully explain foundation models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The dominant modern approach for each NLP task is to use a single foundation model and adapt it slightly with small amounts of task-specific annotated data.
“By contrast, the dominant modern approach for performing each task is to use a single foundation model and adapt it slightly using relatively small amounts of annotated data specific to each task (sentiment classification, named entity tagging, translation, summarization) to create an adapted model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Standard machine learning produces models that are not robust to distribution shifts.
“A major limitation of standard machine learning is that it produces models that are not robust to distribution shifts”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Machine learning has been shown to contribute to, and potentially amplify, societal inequity in many contexts.
“In many contexts, machine learning has been shown to contribute to, and potentially amplify, societal inequity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The generality of foundation models compounds security and privacy concerns, intensifying the risk for function creep or dual use.
“the generality of foundation models compounds these concerns, intensifying the risk for function creep or dual use (i.e., use for unintended purposes)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Systems are a key bottleneck for scaling in terms of data and model size.
“Systems are a key bottleneck for scaling in terms of data and model size”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Generative foundation models are now the primary vehicle for machine learning for language, including analysis and understanding tasks.
“These generative models now constitute the primary vehicle through which machine learning for language is done — including the analysis and understanding tasks that were once considered prerequisites for generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
For the vast majority of NLP tasks, a slightly adapted foundation model greatly outperforms previous task-specific models or pipelines.
“This has proved to be an extremely successful approach: for the vast majority of the tasks described above, a foundation model that is slightly adapted for a task greatly outperforms previous models or pipelines of models that were built specifically to perform that one task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Since the introduction of ELMo and BERT in 2018, the field of NLP has become largely centered around using and understanding foundation models.
“Since the introduction of the early foundation models ELMo [Peters et al. 2018] and BERT [Devlin et al. 2019] in 2018, the field of NLP has become largely centered around using and understanding foundation models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Peters et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models challenge the ability of standard evaluation paradigms in machine learning because they are one step removed from specific tasks.
“Foundation models challenge the ability of standard evaluation paradigms in machine learning to achieve these goals since they are one step removed from specific tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The training data of foundation models largely determines what capabilities these models can acquire.
“the training data of these models largely determines what these capabilities these models can acquire”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Until around 2018, generating general-purpose language was considered very difficult and essentially unapproachable except through other linguistic sub-tasks.
“Until around 2018, the problem of generating general-purpose language was considered very difficult and essentially unapproachable except through other linguistic sub-tasks [Paris et al. 2013].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paris et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
It is now possible to train highly coherent foundation models with a simple language generation objective.
“Now, it is possible to train highly coherent foundation models with a simple language generation objective”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Human language is grounded to the real world.
“One salient difference between foundation models and human language acquisition is that human language is grounded to the real world [Saxton 2017].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saxton 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Multilingual foundation models remain useful for some multilingual applications, such as adapting them for low-resource languages not in their original training set.
“Nevertheless, they remain useful for some multilingual applications, for example through adapting multilingual models for low-resource languages not in their original training set [Wang et al. 2020b].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al. 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 26 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
When a foundation model produces a linguistic construction accurately once, future uses of that construction are not guaranteed to be mostly consistent, especially after a significant domain shift.
“when a foundation model produces a linguistic construction accurately one time there is no guarantee that future uses of that construction will be mostly consistent, especially after a significant domain shift in the subject matter”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lake and Baroni 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kim and Linzen 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bahdanau et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
RoBERTa models express abstract syntactic features before usable meaning.
“Zhang et al. [2021] show that RoBERTa models express abstract syntactic features before usable meaning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 26 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models are not blank-slate learners.
“foundation models are not blank-slate learners [Baroni 2021]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baroni 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Improvements have been observed in traditional computer vision tasks, particularly with respect to generalization capability.
“we have observed improvements in traditional computer vision tasks (particularly with respect to generalization capability) [Radford et al. 2021; Ramesh et al. 2021]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ramesh et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
It would be infeasible to create a corpus that is balanced and representative in all axes of language variation.
“there are so many axes of language variation that it would be infeasible to create a corpus that is balanced and representative in all regards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The potential for foundation models to reduce dependence on explicit annotations may lead to progress on essential cognitive skills like commonsense reasoning.
“However, in the longer-term, the potential for foundation models to reduce dependence on explicit annotations may lead to progress on essential cognitive skills (e.g., commonsense reasoning) which have proven difficult in the current, fully-supervised paradigm [Zellers et al. 2019a; Martin-Martin et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zellers et al. 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Martin-Martin et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
For most of the over 6,000 languages in the world, available text data is not enough to train a large-scale foundation model.
“For most of the over 6,000 languages in the world, the text data available is not enough to train a large-scale foundation model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 26 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models often do not acquire the systematic abstractions expected from humans.
“Foundation models, on the other hand, often do not acquire the systematic abstractions that we expect from humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The future, versatility, and equity of foundation models depend on robustly handling language variation despite unbalanced data.
“The future, versatility, and equity of foundation models all depend on robustly handling language variation despite unbalanced data [e.g., Oren et al. 2019].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oren et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Multilingual models show better performance in languages similar to the highest-resource languages in their training data.
“Multilingual models show better performance in languages that are similar to the highest-resource languages in their training data”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al. 2020d
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
This transition moved computer vision beyond classic approaches and task-specific feature engineering towards models trained once on large data and adapted for broad tasks.
“This transition marked a new era, where we moved beyond the classic approaches and task-specific feature engineering of earlier days [Lowe 2004; Bay et al. 2006; Rosten and Drummond 2006] towards models that could be trained once over large amounts of data, and then adapted for a broad variety of tasks, such as image recognition, object detection, and image segmentation [Krizhevsky et al. 2012; Sz”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lowe 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bay et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rosten and Drummond 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Multilingual foundation models to date (mBERT, mT5, XLM-R) are each trained on around 100 languages.
“The multilingual foundation models to date (mBERT, mT5, XLM-R) are each trained on around 100 languages [Devlin et al. 2019; Goyal et al. 2021; Xue et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goyal et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xue et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Traditional supervised techniques rely on expensive and carefully-collected labels and annotations, limiting their robustness, generalization and applicability.
“Traditional supervised techniques rely on expensive and carefully-collected labels and annotations, limiting their robustness, generalization and applicability”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Most foundation models used in NLP learn from distributional information of raw, ungrounded text.
“Most foundation models used in NLP, on the other hand, learn from the distributional information of raw, ungrounded text”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Joint multilingual training makes foundation models possible for languages where a stand-alone model could not be trained.
“Joint multilingual training relies on the reasonable assumption that the shared structures and patterns between languages can lead to sharing and transfer from the high-resource languages to the low-resource ones, making foundation models possible for languages where we could not train a stand-alone model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Shared structures and patterns between languages can lead to sharing and transfer from high-resource languages to low-resource languages.
- Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Babies and caretakers point to objects during language development.
“For example babies and caretakers point to objects during language development [Colonnesi et al. 2010]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colonnesi et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 26 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
It is generally agreed that humans learn language in a way that allows them to easily slot new knowledge into existing abstractions and productively create new grammatical sentences.
“it is generally agreed that humans learn language in a way that allows them to easily slot new knowledge into existing abstractions and productively create new grammatical sentences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Comrie 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chomsky 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Croft 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The introduction of ImageNet and supervised pretraining led to a deep learning paradigm shift in computer vision.
“The introduction of ImageNet [Deng et al. 2009] and the advent of supervised pretraining led to a deep learning paradigm shift in computer vision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deng et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Current multilingual foundation models in raw form, and naive unsupervised multilingual training, may not model the subtleties of languages and language varieties to their full extent.
“Current multilingual foundation models in their raw form, and naive unsupervised multilingual training as a method, may not model the subtleties of languages and language varieties to their full extent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Languages in multilingual models compete for model parameters.
“it has been shown that languages in multilingual models compete for model parameters”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al. 2020d
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Recent advances in self-supervised learning suggest an alternative route for developing foundation models that use large quantities of raw data to attain contextual understanding of the visual world.
“in contrast, recent advances in self-supervised learning [Chen et al. 2020c; He et al. 2020] suggest an alternative route for the development of foundation models that could make use of large quantities of raw data to attain a contextual understanding of the visual world.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chen et al. 2020c
Not checked in the free run.
- cites He et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Current capabilities of vision foundation models are early-stage relative to the broader aims of the field.
“Relative to the broader aims of the field, the current capabilities of vision foundation models are currently early-stage (§2.2.1: vision-capabilities)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Experiments have shown a surprising amount of transfer between and parallel encoding of different languages in multilingual foundation models.
“Experiments using and analyzing multilingual foundation models have shown that there is indeed a surprising amount of transfer between and parallel encoding of the different languages in multilingual foundation models [Wu and Dredze 2019; Choenni and Shutova 2020; Pires et al. 2019; Libovickỳ et al. 2019; Chi et al. 2020; Papadimitriou et al. 2021; Cao et al. 2019].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Wu and Dredze 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Choenni and Shutova 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pires et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Transferring visual abilities to machines has proved remarkably challenging.
“For a skill executed effortlessly by even simple living creatures, transferring the same abilities to machines has proved remarkably challenging”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Moravec 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thorpe et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fei-Fei et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Babies learn grounded meanings of words that refer to common objects before they learn many other aspects of the linguistic system.
“babies learn the grounded meanings of words that refer to common objects before they learn a lot of the other aspects of the linguistic system [Bergelson and Swingley 2012]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bergelson and Swingley 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Existing foundation models will not suffice for building generalist robots.
“To make progress towards this goal, existing foundation models will not suffice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Many of the same underlying bias issues continue to persist in current foundation models.
“Many of the same underlying issues continue to persist in current foundation models [Agarwal et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Agarwal et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Low-level computer vision inputs are extremely high-dimensional; a single 1080p frame contains over 2 million pixels.
“relative to word token-level inputs in language, low-level computer vision inputs are extremely high-dimensional: a single 1080p frame contains over 2 million pixels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
A naïve approach to fully processing every individual pixel is likely prohibitive.
“Understandably, a naïve approach to fully processing every individual pixel is likely prohibitive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models in language have shown initial steps towards modeling longer-term coherence of events.
“Foundation models in language (§2.1: language) have shown initial steps towards modeling longer-term coherence of events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Standard visual-question answering systems struggle to answer questions requiring commonsense understanding because these questions often require external knowledge beyond pixels alone.
“For instance, standard systems for visual-question answering struggle to answer questions that require commonsense understanding, since these questions often require external knowledge beyond what is present in the pixels alone [Zellers et al. 2019a].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zellers et al. 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The limitations of the fully supervised paradigm motivate the transition to foundation models because reliance on external supervised annotations constrains the upper bound capability of previous approaches to capture diverse visual inputs scalably, robustly and generally.
“The limitations of this fully supervised paradigm motivate the transition to foundation models: the reliance on external supervised annotations constrains the upper bound capability of previous approaches to capture the diverse spectrum of visual inputs in a scalable, robust and generalizable manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Because robots have the ability to actively and autonomously shape their environment, they should be able to generate targeted unlabeled data at scale.
“Moreover, because robots have the ability to actively and autonomously shape their environment, they should be able to generate targeted unlabeled data at scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The ability to capture long-range temporal correlations and causal coherence in visual input would benefit downstream settings like robotics.
“the analogous ability to capture long-range temporal correlations and causal coherence in visual input would stand to benefit downstream settings like robotics [Dai et al. 2019; Alyamkin et al. 2019; Goel et al. 2020b; Feng et al. 2019, §2.3: robotics].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dai et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Alyamkin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goel et al. 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models have shown early indications of understanding scene and object geometry.
“Foundation models have shown early indications of understanding scene and object geometry [Ramesh et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramesh et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
A necessary first step towards developing generalist robots is building a new type of foundation models for reliable task specification.
“Therefore, a necessary first step towards developing generalist robots is building a new type of foundation models for reliable task specification, i.e., the intuitive and effective communication of task objectives, preferences, and constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The key stumbling block for robotic foundation models is collecting the right data.
“Yet while these opportunities exist, the key stumbling block is collecting the right data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
GANs learn to generate visual content of high fidelity, realism and diversity by using a generator and discriminator that supervise one another from image collections alone.
“GANs, for instance, learn to generate visual content of high fidelity, realism and diversity, by featuring two competing networks of a generator and a discriminator that can supervise one another from image collections alone [e.g., Goodfellow et al. 2014; Hudson and Zitnick 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Goodfellow et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hudson and Zitnick 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Scaling up robot data collection to the size of vision and language datasets remains an open challenge.
“While scaling up robot data collection to the size of vision and language datasets [Deng et al. 2009; Krishna et al. 2017; Raffel et al. 2019; Gao et al. 2020a] remains an open challenge, the increasing scale and quality of robotic datasets suggests they can play an important role in learning foundation models for robotics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Deng et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Krishna et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Raffel et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Current foundation models for vision have largely focused on a small subset of modalities, such as RGB images and text, because these are perhaps the most readily accessible.
“Current foundation models for vision have largely focused on a small subset ofmodalities shown in Figure 7 (e.g., datasets of RGB images and text), since these are perhaps the most readily accessible [Changpinyo et al. 2021; Radford et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Changpinyo et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The increasing scale and quality of robotic datasets suggests they can play an important role in learning foundation models for robotics.
“While scaling up robot data collection to the size of vision and language datasets [Deng et al. 2009; Krishna et al. 2017; Raffel et al. 2019; Gao et al. 2020a] remains an open challenge, the increasing scale and quality of robotic datasets suggests they can play an important role in learning foundation models for robotics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Generated deepfake images and misinformation pose greater risks as the semantic and generative capability of vision foundation models continues to grow.
“generated deepfake images and misinformation pose greater risks as the semantic and generative capability of vision foundation models continues to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dolhansky et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ramesh et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
By reducing dependence on explicit annotations, foundation models may enable further progress towards higher-order vision goals than previously feasible.
“By reducing the dependence on explicit annotations, foundation models may enable further progress towards these goals than was previously feasible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Safety risks from robotic foundation models are expected to be different from their language counterparts because embodied agents are empowered to manipulate and interact with their surroundings directly in the physical world.
“We can expect the safety risks from these models for robotics to be different from their language counterparts given that embodied agents are empowered to manipulate and interact with their surroundings directly in the physical world.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Since foundation models may be trained on multiple modalities, they can assist in understanding a range of data sources such as images and texts.
“Since the models may be trained on multiple modalities, foundation models can assist in understanding a range of data sources (e.g., images, texts).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Such flexibility is essential for many of the reasoning challenges discussed, to allow creative generation in domains such as mathematical conjecturing and synthesizing novel programs.
“Such flexibility is essential for many of the reasoning challenges we discussed, to allow creative generation in domains such as mathematical conjecturing [Li et al. 2021b] and synthesizing novel programs [Chen et al. 2021f].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Li et al. 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chen et al. 2021f
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Many reasoning problems exhibit similar latent structures.
“As we mentioned in the last section, many reasoning problems exhibit similar latent structures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Improving high-level reasoning capabilities is a core challenge for existing foundation models.
“Improving the high-level reasoning capabilities is a core challenge for existing foundation models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Grounding representations in other modalities, such as visual or physical, is essential to grasp abstract concepts in reasoning tasks and endow them with concrete meaning.
“First, grounding representations in other modalities, such as visual or physical, are essential to grasp abstract concepts in reasoning tasks and endow them with concrete meaning [Larkin and Simon 1987; Jamnik 2001].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Larkin and Simon 1987
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jamnik 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The semantic and visual distribution of the real world can be simulated by scanning the real world into a simulation.
“and that the semantic and visual distribution of the real world can be simulated by scanning the real world into a simulation [Chang et al. 2017; Kolve et al. 2017b; Savva et al. 2019a; Szot et al. 2021; Shen et al. 2021a].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chang et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kolve et al. 2017b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Savva et al. 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Standard techniques from language modelling, such as pretraining, can greatly improve performance on reasoning tasks.
“It has also been shown that scaling model size significantly improves reasoning capabilities [Polu and Sutskever 2020], and furthermore standard techniques from language modelling, such as pretraining, can also greatly improve performance on these tasks [Rabe et al. 2021; Polu and Sutskever 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rabe et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Polu and Sutskever 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
We still lack general principled approaches in designing self-supervised tasks, as most existing works are tailored to specific problem setups.
“However, we still lack general principled approaches in designing self-supervised tasks, as most of the existing works are tailored to specific problem setups [Yasunaga and Liang 2020; Ren and Leskovec 2020; Han et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Yasunaga and Liang 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ren and Leskovec 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Han et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Data-driven methods using neural networks have shown encouraging results, such as defeating the best humans in Go, by exploiting statistical structures and learning useful heuristics.
“More recently, data-driven methods using neural networks have shown encouraging results — e.g., defeating the best humans in Go [Silver et al. 2016], a board game with a much larger space of actions than the classic challenge of chess — by exploiting statistical structures and learning useful heuristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Silver et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
One core safety challenge for learning-based systems is the chicken-and-egg problem of needing to specify system constraints for safety prior to collecting data, after which unforeseen unsafe behaviors requiring additional constraints may emerge.
“One core safety challenge for learning-based systems is the chicken-and-egg problem of needing to specify system constraints for safety prior to collecting data, after which unforeseen unsafe behaviors requiring additional constraints may emerge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Effective and general sim-to-real learning of manipulation and locomotion skills remains an open challenge.
“While these are promising steps towards closing the sim-to-real gap, effective and general sim-to-real learning of manipulation and locomotion skills remains an open challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The unifying framework imposed by a foundation model can transfer and share significant heuristics across tasks, ranging from generalizing low-level techniques to new scenarios to finding meta-techniques that work across numerous kinds of problems.
“We believe that the unifying framework imposed by a foundation model can transfer and share significant heuristics across tasks, ranging from generalizing low-level techniques that work well for one task to new scenarios all the way to directly finding meta-techniques that work well across numerous kinds of problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
As one scales up foundation models, the capabilities of capturing such statistical structures also grow immensely.
“As one scales up foundation models, the capabilities of capturing such statistical structures also grow immensely [Polu and Sutskever 2020].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Polu and Sutskever 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The vast amount of data, computing resources, and skills needed to create a powerful task-specific model is frequently in conflict with the iterative prototyping process necessary to elicit and satisfy users' needs and values.
“The vast amount of data, computing resources, and skills needed to create a powerful task-specific model is frequently in conflict with the iterative prototyping process necessary to elicit and satisfy users' needs and values [Yang et al. 2016].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The foundation model training and adaptation framework encourages a separation of concerns, where training learns meta-knowledge such as shared search tree structure between drug retrosynthesis and propositional logic proofs, and adaptation focuses on task-specific vocabulary.
“The foundation model training and adaptation framework encourage a separation of concerns, where foundation model training learns meta-knowledge such as the shared search tree structure between drug retrosynthesis and propositional logic proofs, and the adaptation phase can focus on learning the task specific vocabulary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Early learning-based approaches that used a constrained search space to make the problem tractable suffered from the limited kinds of actions the solver could issue.
“To overcome the unbounded search space challenge, researchers first started with a constrained search space to make the problem tractable [Huang et al. 2018; Bansal et al. 2019]. But such approaches suffered from the limited kinds of actions the solver could issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Huang et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bansal et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
It is possible that collecting datasets of size comparable to those used in vision and language is insufficient for robotics.
“Given the challenging closed-loop nature of learning control, it is possible that collecting datasets of size comparable to those used in vision and language is insufficient for robotics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
A major challenge lies in bridging the gap between simulation and the real world, both in the underlying physics and in the semantic distribution of environments and tasks.
“However, a major challenge lies in bridging the gap between simulation and the real world, both in the underlying physics and in the semantic distribution of environments and tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
High-quality annotated data for reasoning problems is scarce and harder to collect than raw images and text.
“Due to the intrinsic difficulty of these problems, high-quality annotated data is scarce and harder to collect compared to raw images and text.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Scaling model size significantly improves reasoning capabilities.
“It has also been shown that scaling model size significantly improves reasoning capabilities [Polu and Sutskever 2020], and furthermore standard techniques from language modelling, such as pretraining, can also greatly improve performance on these tasks [Rabe et al. 2021; Polu and Sutskever 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Polu and Sutskever 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Due to the unbounded search space, it becomes intractable to enumerate all kinds of possibilities.
“Due to the unbounded search space, it becomes intractable to enumerate all kinds of possibilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Since a foundation model is trained across many domains, it can positively transfer meta-knowledge encoded in its weights across tasks and domains.
“In addition, since a foundation model is trained across many domains, it can positively transfer meta-knowledge encoded in the foundation models' weights across tasks and domains [Papadimitriou and Jurafsky 2020; Wu et al. 2021f; Lu et al. 2021a].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Papadimitriou and Jurafsky 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wu et al. 2021f
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lu et al. 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Besides theorem proving, many real-world problems deal with unbounded search spaces, such as program synthesis, drug discovery, chemical synthesis, computer-aided design, combinatorial optimization, and more.
“Besides theorem proving, many real-world problems deal with unbounded search spaces, such as program synthesis [Gulwani et al. 2017], drug discovery [Drews 2000], chemical synthesis [Segler et al. 2018], computer-aided design [Haigh 1985], combinatorial optimization [Bengio et al. 2021], and more.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gulwani et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Drews 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Segler et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The generative capabilities of foundation models are essential for effective reasoning.
“We believe that the generative capabilities of foundation models are essential for effective reasoning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Preventable medical errors cause wastes in healthcare.
“preventable medical errors (e.g., hospital readmissions, surgical errors) cause wastes in healthcare [Shrank et al. 2019; Shah et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shrank et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shah et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Foundation models have strong adaptation capabilities such as fine-tuning and prompting.
“As foundation models have strong adaptation capabilities (e.g., fine-tuning, prompting [Brown et al. 2020]), they can be efficiently adapted to various individual tasks in healthcare and biomedicine”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
As demand for healthcare increases, society faces a serious shortage in healthcare providers.
“as the demand for healthcare increases, the society faces a serious shortage in healthcare providers [Kirch and Petelle 2017].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kirch and Petelle 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The same generalizability and high ceiling that give foundation models their edge can also make them difficult to work with, as they may be even more unpredictable and complex than single-purpose AI models.
“Unfortunately, the same generalizability and high ceiling that give foundation models their edge can also make these models difficult to work with, as they may be even more unpredictable and complex than single-purpose AI models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Language-based foundation models' ability to take natural language as input and generalize to many downstream tasks could significantly lower the difficulty threshold for application development by enabling development of sophisticated models without collecting significant amounts of data and training large models from scratch.
“For instance, language-based foundationmodels' ability to take natural language as input, and to generalize to many downstream tasks, could significantly lower the difficulty”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Myers et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 52 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
A system might have achieved the mapping that internalism or referentialism require, but we may be unable to show this with behavioral testing.
“Second, a system might have achieved the mapping that these views require, but we may be unable to show this with behavioral testing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Both capabilities of foundation models derive from their ability to extract co-occurrence patterns from their training data.
“Both capabilities derive from these models' ability to extract co-occurrence patterns from their training data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
If a model receives only linguistic inputs, its capacity to learn the mapping might be fundamentally limited in ways that prevent it from learning to refer in the relevant sense.
“If the model receives only linguistic inputs, then its capacity to learn this mapping might be fundamentally limited in ways that prevent it from learning to refer in the relevant sense.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In an urgent pandemic crisis such as COVID-19, fast diagnosis/screening and automated question answering for patients and the public are vital to reduce disease spread and allocate healthcare resources.
“in an urgent pandemic crisis such as COVID-19, fast diagnosis/screening (e.g., automatic analysis of chest X-ray images) as well as automated question answering for patients (e.g., symptom checking and care) and the public (e.g., disease prevention) are vital to reduce the spread of diseases and allocate healthcare resources for critical patients, saving more lives [Lalmuanawma et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lalmuanawma et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 52 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
If we take internalism or referentialism as the ultimate target, then behavioral tests will always be at best imperfect as a means of assessing whether understanding has been achieved.
“If we take internalism or referentialism as the ultimate target – our gold standard for what understanding is – then behavioral tests will always be at best imperfect as a means of assessing whether understanding has been achieved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 52 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Behavioral tests will always have gaps that could allow unsophisticated models to slip through.
“First, behavioral tests will always have gaps that could allow unsophisticated models to slip through.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Early generations of foundation model-powered software tools for multimedia creation and editing have started to drive a new frontier that empowers even novice content creators to generate high-quality multimedia from coarse, intuitive specifications.
“Already, early generations of what can be considered foundation model-powered software tools for multimedia creation and editing have started to drive a new frontier that empowers even novice content creators to generate high-quality multimedia from coarse, intuitive specifications (e.g., collaborative authoring for writers [Lee et al. 2022], text-to-image generation for digital artists,19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al. 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Recent work has shown that GPT-3 can robustly perform classification tasks in a few-shot or even zero-shot fashion when given an adequate task description in its natural language prompt.
“Recent work has shown that GPT-3, for example, can robustly perform classification tasks in a few-shot or even in zero-shot fashion when given an adequate task description in its natural language prompt [Brown et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Healthcare providers spend unnecessary time editing electronic health records (EHRs).
“Healthcare providers spend unnecessary time editing electronic heath records (EHRs) [Kocher 2021]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kocher 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
We can agree with Bender and Koller's assessment without concluding that foundation models are in general incapable of understanding.
“We can agree with this assessment without concluding that foundation models are in general incapable of understanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Current foundation models' training objectives do not include explainability.
“current foundation models' training objectives do not include explainability, requiring future research in this direction [Linardatos et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Linardatos et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Many individuals, especially those with low income, struggle to secure adequate legal representation.
“many individuals, especially those with low income, struggle to secure adequate legal representation [Rhode 2004].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rhode 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Lu et al. [2021a] showed a transformer model trained on natural language could be adapted for other sequence-based tasks such as protein fold prediction.
“Lu et al. [2021a] showed how a transformer model trained on natural language (a data-rich modality) could be adapted for other sequence-based tasks such as protein fold prediction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lu et al. [2021a]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 58 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The ability to leverage existing datasets and extrapolate to new settings is a key machine learning challenge in biomedicine.
“The ability to leverage existing datasets and extrapolate to new settings is a key machine learning challenge in biomedicine [Snell et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2021b].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Snell et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ma et al. 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The process of biomedical discovery involves extrapolation.
- Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models have a potential to integrate diverse data modalities in medicine, enabling investigation of biomedical concepts from multiple scales and knowledge sources.
“foundation models have a potential to integrate diverse data modalities in medicine, which enables investigating biomedical concepts (e.g., disease) from multiple scales (using molecule-, patient- and population-level data) and multiple knowledge sources (using imaging, textual and chemical descriptions).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lanckriet et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Aerts et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kong et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Recent work has used machine learning models to identify relevant legal issues contained in a plain-language description of facts presented by a client.
“Recent work has used machine learning models to identify the relevant legal issues contained in a plain-language description of facts presented by a client.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Given a set of drugs and a patient genome, foundation models may help predict which drug is likeliest to treat the patient with minimal side effects.
“given a set of drugs and a patient genome, foundation models may help predict which drug is likeliest to treat the patient with minimal side effects [Whirl-Carrillo et al. 2012; Tatonetti et al. 2012; Gerstung et al. 2017; Grinfeld et al. 2018; Adam et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Whirl-Carrillo et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tatonetti et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gerstung et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Identifying the appropriate target and generating a corresponding molecule requires years of expensive wet lab experiments.
“identifying the appropriate target and generating a corresponding molecule requires years of expensive wet lab experiments [Hughes et al. 2011; Schenone et al. 2013; Schneider 2018].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hughes et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schenone et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schneider 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Current systems for document review are costly because they use supervised learning and active learning to label documents as responsive.
“Current systems are costly because they used supervised learning and active learning to label the documents as responsive [Grossman and Cormack 2010; Oard et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Grossman and Cormack 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Oard et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yang et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Simultaneous solution of related drug discovery problems by a single foundation model may improve the solutions to each of them.
“the simultaneous solution of related drug discovery problems (i.e., target identification, efficacy prediction, side effect prediction, and others) by a single foundation model may improve the solutions to each of them [Ramsundar et al. 2015; Camacho et al. 2018; Duran-Frigola et al. 2020; Huang et al. 2021a].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ramsundar et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Camacho et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Duran-Frigola et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Medical data are highly multimodal, with various data types, scales, and styles.
“Medical data are highly multimodal, with various data types (text, image, video, database, molecule), scales (molecule, gene, cell, tissue, patient, population) [Kong et al. 2011; Ruiz et al. 2020], and styles (professional and lay language) [Lavertu and Altman 2019; Li et al. 2019].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kong et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ruiz et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lavertu and Altman 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Recent work has utilized pretrained models for the recommendation of relevant citations and holding statements when writing legal texts.
“recent work has utilized pretrained models for the recommendation of relevant citations and holding statements when writing legal texts [Zheng et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2021b; Ostendorff et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Zheng et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Huang et al. 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ostendorff et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Traditional supervised methods rarely achieve the level of accuracy required in the legal domain.
“traditional supervised methods rarely achieve the level of accuracy required in the legal domain [Vieira et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vieira et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Due to high costs, labeled training data is scarce in legal applications.
- Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Federated learning is one potential solution to keeping raw sensitive data private in the training of foundation models.
“Federated learning is one potential solution to keeping the raw, sensitive data private in the training of foundation models [Chamikara et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chamikara et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models are uniquely powerful in their ability to integrate multimodal patient data to make an optimal prediction.
“Foundation models are uniquely powerful in their ability to integrate multimodal patient data ranging from the EHR [Rajkomar et al. 2018] to medical imaging [Bera et al. 2019; Ouyang et al. 2020] to drug and molecular measurements [Gottlieb et al. 2011; Ruiz et al. 2020] to make an optimal prediction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Rajkomar et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bera et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ouyang et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The price of education per student is growing faster than economy-wide costs.
“The price of education per student is growing faster than economy-wide costs [Bowen 2012]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bowen 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 64 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Holzenberger et al. [2020] found that simply using a BERT model, even when pretrained on in-domain legal text, was not sufficient to allow the model to deduce and apply the relevant rules.
“However, they found that simply using a BERT model, even when pretrained on in-domain legal text, was not sufficient to allow the model to deduce and apply the relevant rules, a process also referred to as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holzenberger et al. [2020]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Existing work has leveraged NLP for facilitative moderation in public comment forums.
“existing work has leveraged NLP for facilitative moderation in public comment forums.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Park et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 64 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Few-shot learning is still in its infancy.
“Some challenges facing foundation models beyond those described in the above example include few-shot learning, which is still in its infancy [Perez et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Perez et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 64 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Holzenberger et al. [2020] provide a dataset and methodology for evaluating the ability to identify a relevant legal rule and determine how it applies to a new situation in current models based on the tax code.
“Holzenberger et al. [2020] provide a dataset andmethodology for evaluating this ability in current models based on the tax code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holzenberger et al. [2020]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 68 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models have already started to boost the performance of some specific flagship tasks in education.
“Foundation models have already started to boost the performance of some specific flagship tasks in education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shen et al. 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wu et al. 2021e
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 64 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Holzenberger et al. [2020] found that domain experts can express the relevant tax law as a prolog solver to determine an individual's tax liability with perfect accuracy.
“Holzenberger et al. [2020] found that domain experts can express the relevant tax law as a prolog solver to determine an individual's tax liability with perfect accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holzenberger et al. [2020]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Larger legal benchmark datasets may be necessary to observe further gains from applying transfer learning techniques to foundation models.
“This work suggests that larger legal benchmark datasets may be necessary to observe further gains from applying transfer learning techniques to foundation models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Some recent efforts have sought to create large labeled datasets for more challenging legal benchmark tasks through automation or manual annotation by volunteer legal experts.
“Some recent efforts have sought to create large labeled datasets for more challenging legal benchmark tasks through automation [Zheng et al. 2021] or manual annotation by volunteer legal experts [Hendrycks et al. 2021c].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zheng et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hendrycks et al. 2021c
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Some gains have been observed from domain-adaptive pretraining on unlabeled legal corpora.
“Some gains have been observed from domain-adaptive pretraining on unlabeled legal corpora.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zheng et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 68 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Due to the difficulty and cost of creating large datasets, using this approach to solve every educational task independently is fundamentally limited.
“Due to the difficulty and cost of creating large datasets, using this approach to solve every educational task independently is fundamentally limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Existing work has focused on custom solutions to highly specific tasks for which large amounts of training data has to be collected from scratch.
- Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Pretrained models have been used for processing parole hearing transcripts to find instances of anomalous outcomes.
“Pretrained models have been used for processing parole hearing transcripts to find instances of anomalous outcomes [Bell et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bell et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Providing high quality, inclusive education at a large scale poses difficult societal and economic challenges.
“However, providing high quality, inclusive education at a large scale poses difficult societal and economic challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 64 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Current foundation models have a problem of creating fake facts.
“The foundation model also cannot create fake facts in the process, a problem that has come up in current models [Gretz et al. 2020; Zellers et al. 2019b].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gretz et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zellers et al. 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
These gains appear to be most pronounced when the pretraining corpus is highly relevant to the downstream task and labeled training data is limited.
“These gains appear to be most pronounced when the pretraining corpus is highly relevant to the downstream task and labeled training data is limited (a setting which is common in the law) [Zheng et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zheng et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Parole transcripts can be hundreds of pages long.
“parole transcripts can be hundreds of pages long [Bell et al. 2021]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bell et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Much available legal data may be unrepresentative.
“Much available legal data may also be unrepresentative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Creating benchmark datasets for tasks that are legally meaningful and difficult from an NLP perspective can itself be challenging, as human expert annotation can be costly and automated methods can fail to account for unique aspects of legal text.
“However, creating benchmark datasets for tasks that are legally meaningful and difficult from an NLP perspective can itself be challenging, as human expert annotation can be costly and automated methods that utilize conventional tokenization and sentence segmentation techniques can fail to account for unique aspects of legal text, such as the structure of legal citations [Bommarito et al. 2018; S”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bommarito et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Savelka et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The multiplicative interaction embodied in attention and gating structures offers a more flexible alternative to the rigid fixed-weight computation of MLPs and CNNs, dynamically adapting computation to the input.
“From another perspective, the multiplicative interaction embodied in both attention as well as gating structures (as in LSTMs [Hochreiter and Schmidhuber 1997] or Mixture-of-Experts [Shazeer et al. 2017]) offers a more flexible alternative to the rigid fixed-weight computation of MLPs and CNNs, dynamically adapting the computation to the input at hand.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hochreiter and Schmidhuber 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shazeer et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 76 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Attention has stronger generality than prior architectures, as it is not strongly tied to a particular task or domain, unlike the local receptive field of convolution or the sequential assumption of recurrent networks.
“A final notable advantage of attention over prior architectures stems from its stronger generality, where it is not strongly tied to a particular task or domain, as is the case for the local receptive field of convolution or the sequential assumption of recurrent networks, both reflecting inherent properties specific to the vision and language modalities respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Providing effective instruction requires an additional capability: understanding pedagogy.
“However, providing effective instruction requires an additional capability: that of understanding pedagogy [McKenzie 2003].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McKenzie 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Some research has also explored effective ways of extracting, from instructors, generative descriptions of how students make mistakes.
“Some research has also explored effective ways of extracting, from instructors, generative descriptions of how students make mistakes [Malik et al. 2021; Gulwani and Singh 2013]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Malik et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gulwani and Singh 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
An algorithm was able to grade an introductory Computer Science midterm at Stanford University, with the same effectiveness as human teaching assistants.
“As a concrete case study, many of these insights were leveraged as core components of an algorithm which was able to grade an introductory Computer Science midterm at Stanford University, with the same effectiveness as human teaching assistants [Wu et al. 2021e].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wu et al. 2021e
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
This presents technical challenges beyond what would be faced in typical NLP domain shift settings.
“This presents technical challenges beyond what would be faced in typical NLP domain shift settings (e.g., question answering based on news articles vs. Reddit posts), as the foundation model would need to be fluidly adaptable in terms of its tone and language, and not just the factual content that it generates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The feedback task inherently requires a transfer of understanding from external data and experience.
“As such, the feedback task inherently requires a transfer of understanding from external data and experience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Great depths play a crucial role in enhancing networks' expressivity, allowing them to form powerful hierarchical and distributed representations that could generalize from training data to new unseen examples.
“Great depths play a crucial role in enhancing networks' expressivity, allowing them to form powerful hierarchical and distributed representations that could generalize from the training data to new unseen examples [He et al. 2016b; Levine et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites He et al. 2016b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Levine et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Different education contexts vary significantly in the kind of language that would be appropriate.
“The adaptation problem above is compounded by the fact that different education contexts vary significantly in the kind of language that would be appropriate: for example, effective instruction in a 5th-grade science class would look quite different from that in a college physics class, much less a college literature class.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Foundation models, as they currently exist, are directly helpful for understanding a specific subject matter.
“Foundation models, as they currently exist, are directly helpful for the first of these capabilities: understanding a specific subject matter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent foundation models achieve remarkable performance across a multitude of diverse downstream tasks and applications.
“These and other instances of recent foundation models not only achieve remarkable performance across a multitude of diverse downstream tasks and applications [Rajpurkar et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2019a]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rajpurkar et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al. 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Some research has already started exploring foundation models that can quickly adapt to questions in new subject matter domains.
“Some research in this direction has already started exploring foundation models that can quickly adapt to questions in new subject matter domains [Wu et al. 2021e; Condor et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wu et al. 2021e
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Condor et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Much of the success of neural networks over the last decade in modeling natural data is owed to the networks' high depths.
“Much of the success of neural networks over the last decade in modeling natural data is owed to the networks' high depths, as could be roughly measured by the number of stacked non-linear layers they are composed of, or the number of computational steps they take during their chain-of-reasoning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites He et al. 2016b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Levine et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Training an AI system to notice is an achievable goal.
“While difficult, training an AI system to notice is an achievable goal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Across classrooms, and across learning tasks in a given domain, there are generalizable patterns in how students arrive at their answers.
- Premisecitation§ 72 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
A salient difference between foundation model training and human language acquisition is that human language is grounded to the real world.
“As the authors point out, a salient difference between foundation model training and human language acquisition is that”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites §2.1
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Subject matter encoding was built on a foundation model that had been adapted on GitHub code and a corresponding small dataset for each question's subject matter.
“In this case, subject matter encoding was built on a foundation model that had been adapted on GitHub code and a corresponding small dataset for each question's subject matter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wu et al. 2021e
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
No single model or algorithm suits best for all cases.
“As the No Free Lunch theorem suggests, there is no single model or algorithm that suits best for all cases [Wolpert and Macready 1997]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wolpert and Macready 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Even for massive courses with millions of students, supervised algorithms barely understand the complex student reasoning behind even short, four-line programs.
“Even for massive courses with millions of students, supervised algorithms barely understand the complex student reasoning behind even short, four-line programs [Malik et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Malik et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
When learning to provide feedback on short programming questions, a foundation model such as GPT-3 can efficiently understand what fluent code looks like with a few examples.
“For example, when learning to provide feedback on short programming questions, a foundation model such as GPT-3 can efficiently understand what fluent code looks like with a few examples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Models such as Module Networks and Mixture-of-Experts exhibit structural modularity and compositional computation, supported by specialization of sub-networks to different operations.
“Models such as Module Networks [Andreas et al. 2016] and Mixture-of-Experts [Shazeer et al. 2017] go further along this direction, exhibiting not only structural modularity, but also compositional computation, supported by the specialization of sub-networks to different operations, in a manner that adapts and tailors the model behavior to the input at hand.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Andreas et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shazeer et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Separating computation from memory can enhance models' ability to transfer knowledge by applying previously acquired abstract skills to new concrete settings.
“An important design principle that could achieve these desiderata is to separate out computation from memory [Weston et al. 2014; Graves et al. 2016; Hudson and Manning 2018, 2019a] in order to enhance models' ability to transfer knowledge by applying previously acquired abstract skills to new concrete settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Weston et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Graves et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hudson and Manning 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A supervised learning task like sentiment classification may lead to a more narrow set of capabilities than language modeling.
“In contrast, a supervised learning task like sentiment classification may lead to a more narrow set of capabilities (see §2.1: language).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 76 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Models such as GANformer and Perceiver propose transformers with linear complexity that rely on bipartite or bottleneck attention to improve computational efficiency while maintaining high expressivity.
“Models such as the GANformer [Hudson and Zitnick 2021] and the Perceiver [Jaegle et al. 2021b,a] explore ways to balance these two properties and propose transformers with linear complexity that rely on bipartite or bottleneck attention, so to improve computational efficiency while maintaining high-expressivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hudson and Zitnick 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jaegle et al. 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Compositionality is a crucial ingredient of human intelligence, underlying capabilities to plan, reason and learn readily and efficiently from a handful of examples.
“It is a crucial ingredient of human intelligence [Lake et al. 2017], underlying our capabilities to plan, reason and learn readily and efficiently from a handful of examples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lake et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
There is a trade-off between the strong memorization skills offered by retrieval mechanisms and the richer representations learned when there is an information bottleneck.
“However, there is trade-off between the strong memorization skills offered by retrieval mechanisms on the one hand and the richer representations learned when there is an information bottleneck on the other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Models that rely on external retrieval mechanisms may not learn to generalize as effectively as bounded, compact and abstract representations.
“Overall, While they certainly have some merits [Guu et al. 2020], models that rely on external retrieval mechanisms may not learn to generalize as effectively as bounded, compact and abstract representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guu et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because broad data lacks external annotations, a major focus for researchers is designing bespoke self-supervised algorithms that leverage the unique structure within each kind of data to produce a training signal for a foundation model.
“Because this data lacks external annotations, a major focus for researchers is designing bespoke self-supervised algorithms that leverage the unique structure within each kind of data to produce a training signal for a foundation model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Decoupling explicit and implicit knowledge improves models' trust and reliability by increasing their knowledge provenance.
“improves models' trust and reliability by increasing their knowledge provenance [Cheney et al. 2009]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cheney et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 76 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
There is a trade-off between efficiency and expressivity: explicit modeling of long-distance interactions through short and direct computation paths improves expressivity but comes at the expense of scalability due to computation entailed by increased connectivity.
“This challenge essentially reflects the trade-off between efficiency and expressivity: where explicit modeling of long-distance interactions through short and direct computation paths improves expressivity on the one hand, but comes at the expense of scalability due to computation entailed by the increased connectivity on the other [Child et al. 2019; Kitaev et al. 2020; Choromanski et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Child et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kitaev et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Choromanski et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Decoupling explicit and implicit knowledge mitigates the inflation in models' size and number of parameters needed to store growing quantities of knowledge.
“The separation mitigates the inflation in models' size and number of parameters needed to store the growing quantities of knowledge [Guu et al. 2020]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guu et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The in-context learning abilities of GPT-3 possibly emerge as a by-product of enforcing the network to represent the input sequential data through its bounded memory architecture.
“For instance, the in-context learning abilities of GPT-3 possibly emerge as a by-product of enforcing the network to represent the input sequential data through its bounded memory architecture [Brown et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Compositionality at the model level, in terms of architectural properties, structure, and degree of modularity, can increase training and inference efficiency of large neural models.
“Compositionality can be reflected at the model level, in terms of its architectural properties, structure, and degree of modularity — which can increase training and inference efficiency of large neural models [Shazeer et al. 2017].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shazeer et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The rise of self-supervised algorithms has made model size and compute resources increasingly salient bottlenecks.
“The rise of self-supervised algorithms has made model size and compute resources increasingly salient bottlenecks [Kaplan et al. 2020; Henighan et al. 2020]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kaplan et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Henighan et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Models are evaluated not solely on their capabilities but rather on the amount and kind of compute needed to reach those capabilities.
“leading to a shift where models are evaluated not solely on their capabilities but rather on the amount and kind of compute needed to reach those capabilities (§4.4: evaluation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The learned representation itself, which emerges over the course of model training and adaptation, can also be compositional.
“But most notably, the learned representation itself, which emerges over the course of the model training and adaptation, can also be compositional [Andreas 2019].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Andreas 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Over-reliance on retrieval reduces the opportunities to learn how to represent information in compact and abstract manners, distill key insights and concepts, and separate the wheat from the chaff.
“Indeed, over-reliance on retrieval reduces the opportunities to learn how to represent information in compact and abstract manners, distill key insights and concepts out of the vast amounts of input information the model is exposed too, and, basically, separate the wheat from the chaff.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
These constraints 'bake in' the kinds of capabilities desired when adapting models to downstream tasks.
“At some level, these constraints”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
The cost of annotation varies greatly across tasks and languages.
“However, the cost of annotation varies greatly across tasks and languages; for example, annotating MRI data requires expert medical knowledge, whereas labeling sentiment for English texts requires only common sense judgement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
SSL objectives are highly domain-specific: different methods currently prevail in natural language processing, computer vision, and speech processing.
“Right now, SSL objectives are highly domain-specific: different methods currently prevail in natural language processing, computer vision, and speech processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In text summarization, appending a prompt such as TL;DR to the input article can improve foundation model performance by acting as a task specification.
“For example, in text summarization, appending a prompt such as TL;DR to the input article can improve foundation model performance [Radford et al. 2019] by acting as a task specification for the foundation model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Radford et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Task specialization mostly demands task-specific labeled data as training signals.
“Task specialization mostly demands task-specific labeled data as training signals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
There is an instance in which the performance gap between full fine-tuning and lightweight adaptation vanishes as the model size increases.
“Lester et al. [2021] shows an instance when the performance gap between full fine-tuning and lightweight adaptation vanishes as the model size increases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lester et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Approaches that model raw bytes become intractable when training models like transformers whose compute costs grow quadratically with the input size.
“These approaches also become intractable when training models like transformers [Vaswani et al. 2017] whose compute costs grow quadratically with the input size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vaswani et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Some low-memory procedures such as gradient checkpointing trade off computation and memory, potentially exacerbating the significant energy consumption of foundation models.
“However, some low-memory procedures such as gradient checkpointing [Chen et al. 2016] trade off computation and memory, potentially exacerbating the significant energy consumption of foundation models [Bender et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chen et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bender et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)
Modeling input at the level of raw bytes may cause the model to focus on predicting less semantic aspects of the input, slowing the rate at which it acquires more generally-useful capabilities.
“However, this high dimensionality may cause the model to focus on predicting less semantic aspects of the input,50 slowing the rate at which it acquires more generally-useful capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Adapting a foundation model before use is necessary for some applications.
“While foundation models provide a powerful general-purpose engine for processing multi-modal information, adapting a foundation model before use is necessary for some applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 117
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 262
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Startups are much more well-resourced than academia and can still afford to train the largest foundation models.
“today startups (OpenAI, Anthropic, AI21 Labs, etc.) are much more well-resourced than academia and can therefore still afford to train the largest foundation models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models dominate standard NLP benchmarks.
“While these models dominate standard benchmarks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation model research is largely confined to computer science and AI, with impact centered in the tech industry.
“At present, foundation model research is largely confined to computer science and AI, with the impact of foundation models and the applications they support largely being centered in the tech industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMany gaps in mutual understanding about foundation models existed and existing literature only covered bits and pieces.
“we noticed that there were many gaps in mutual understanding — how the technology worked, how industry develops foundation models, how to think about the ethical concerns, etc., and existing literature only covered bits and pieces”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingreasoning§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The study of foundation models is largely empirical.
“At present, the study of foundation models is largely empirical”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The existing trajectory favors even more intensive foundation models.
“with the existing trajectory favoring even more intensive models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Security and privacy for foundation models is largely uncharted at present.
“Security and privacy for foundation models is largely uncharted at present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Existing consideration of algorithmic tools in the United States legal landscape remains broadly uncertain.
“Centering on the legal landscape of the United States, where existing consideration of algorithmic tools remains broadly uncertain”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The de facto approach for adaptation has been fine-tuning.
“The de facto approach for adaptation has been fine-tuning”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Co-design of algorithms, models, software, and hardware is already starting to happen in various forms.
“This co-design is already starting to happen to in various forms, from carefully tuned parallelism strategies to new architectures such as retrieval-based and mixture-of-expert models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Current foundation model training data is selected using unspecified or unclear principles with a general lack of transparency.
“the current modus operandi is for training data to be selected using unspecified or unclear principles with a general lack of transparency regarding the nature of training data”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models rest on tenuous legal footings at present, and how the law bears on their development and use is largely unclear.
“Foundation models rest on tenuous legal footings at present; how the law bears on both the development and use of these models is largely unclear.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Current discussion centers the enormous single-time training costs of foundation models and the potential to amortize these costs across repeated use.
“At present, current discussion centers these enormous single-time training costs and the potential to amortize these costs across repeated use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Robot datasets contain large amounts of unlabeled data consisting of synchronized observations from many different sensor modalities and a sequence of actions that the robot has performed to generate these observations.
“In particular, robot datasets contain large amounts of unlabeled data consisting of synchronized observations from many different sensor modalities (e.g., RGB and depth cameras, haptic sensors, microphones, etc.) and a sequence of actions that the robot has performed to generate these observations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ AbstractFoundation models are based on standard deep learning and transfer learning.
“Though foundation models are based on standard deep learning and transfer learning, their scale results in new emergent capabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 1 INTRODUCTIONThe characteristics of existing foundation models are in general poorly understood.
“their characteristics are in general poorly understood”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ AbstractWe currently lack a clear understanding of how foundation models work, when they fail, and what they are even capable of due to their emergent properties.
“we currently lack a clear understanding of how they work, when they fail, and what they are even capable of due to their emergent properties”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ AbstractHomogenization provides powerful leverage.
“Homogenization provides powerful leverage but demands caution”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ AbstractThe effectiveness of foundation models across many tasks incentivizes homogenization.
“their effectiveness across so many tasks incentivizes homogenization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ AbstractAI is undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of models trained on broad data that can be adapted to a wide range of downstream tasks.
“AI is undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of models (e.g., BERT, DALL-E, GPT-3) trained on broad data (generally using self-supervision at scale) that can be adapted to a wide range of downstream tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ AbstractHomogenization demands caution because the defects of the foundation model are inherited by all adapted models downstream.
“Homogenization provides powerful leverage but demands caution, as the defects of the foundation model are inherited by all the adapted models downstream.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1 INTRODUCTIONFoundation models are not new; they are based on deep neural networks and self-supervised learning, both of which have existed for decades.
“foundation models are not new — they are based on deep neural networks and self-supervised learning, both of which have existed for decades”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Data is naturally multimodal in some domains, such as medical images, structured data, and clinical text in healthcare.
“Data is naturally multimodal in some domains—e.g., medical images, structured data, clinical text in healthcare (§3.1: healthcare).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ AbstractFoundation models are fundamentally sociotechnical.
“their fundamentally sociotechnical nature”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 1 INTRODUCTIONExisting foundation models have the potential to accentuate harms.
“existing foundation models have the potential to accentuate harms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Homogenization could potentially provide enormous gains for many domains where task-specific data is quite limited.
“Homogenization could potentially provide enormous gains for many domains where task-specific data is quite limited”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Deep learning reflected a further shift towards homogenization: rather than having bespoke feature engineering pipelines for each application, the same deep neural network architecture could be used for many applications.
“Deep learning also reflected a further shift towards homogenization: rather than having bespoke feature engineering pipelines for each application, the same deep neural network architecture could be used for many applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningHomogenization creates single points of failure.
“it provides strong leverage towards many tasks but also creates single points of failure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1 INTRODUCTIONGPT-3 has 175 billion parameters and can be adapted via natural language prompts to do a passable job on a wide range of tasks despite not being trained explicitly to do many of those tasks.
“GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters and can be adapted via natural language prompts to do a passable job on a wide range of tasks despite not being trained explicitly to do many of those tasks [Brown et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHomogenization provides strong leverage towards many tasks.
“Homogenization indicates the consolidation of methodologies for building machine learning systems across a wide range of applications; it provides strong leverage towards many tasks but also creates single points of failure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)GPT-3, with 175 billion parameters compared to GPT-2's 1.5 billion, permits in-context learning, in which the language model can be adapted to a downstream task simply by providing it with a prompt.
“GPT-3 [Brown et al. 2020], with 175 billion parameters compared to GPT-2's 1.5 billion, permits in-context learning, in which the language model can be adapted to a downstream task simply by providing it with a prompt”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 12 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Learning@home is attempting to harness volunteer computing for training foundation models.
“Recently, the Learning@home project is attempting to harness volunteer computing for training foundation models [Ryabinin and Gusev 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ryabinin and Gusev 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Child language acquisition is more sample efficient than the training of foundation models.
“child language acquisition is more sample efficient than the training of foundation models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Many of the impacts of foundation models come from decisions made in other stages in the pipeline.
“many of the impacts come from decisions made in other stages in the pipeline”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 12 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Steady technological progress in foundation models is anticipated over the coming years.
“so we anticipate steady technological progress over the coming years”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFoundation models have demonstrated raw potential, but we are still in the early days.
“Foundation models have demonstrated raw potential, but we are still in the early days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Having access to existing models can be useful for powering downstream applications or identifying defects (e.g., bias), but this might not be enough for us to design better architectures or training objectives for foundation models that can fix these defects (e.g., mitigate the bias).
“Having access to existing models can be useful for powering downstream applications or identifying defects (e.g., bias), but this might not be enough for us to design better architectures or training objectives for foundation models that can fix these defects (e.g., mitigate the bias).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Research models are often not extensively tested and might have unknown failure modes.
“Research models are often not extensively tested and might have unknown failure modes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)All data has an owner and is created with a purpose.
“all data has an owner and is created with a purpose”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There is no single natural distribution of data; even the most permissive Internet crawl requires some selection and post-filtering.
“There is no single natural distribution of data; even the most permissive Internet crawl requires some selection and post-filtering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There is little incentive for any given company to create an open, decentralized ecosystem for developing foundation models that encourages broad participation.
“there is little incentive for any given company to create an open, decentralized ecosystem for developing foundation models that encourages broad participation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Academia is distinctively positioned to shape the development of foundation models to ensure that we capture directions with potentially large social benefit that might not otherwise be prioritized by industry.
“We believe that academia is distinctively positioned to shape the development of foundation models to ensure that we capture directions with potentially large social benefit that might not otherwise be prioritized by industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 12 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Folding@home has successfully implemented volunteer computing for simulating protein dynamics.
“The Folding@home project has successfully implemented this approach for simulating protein dynamics [Beberg et al. 2009].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beberg et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Training on multimodal and embodied data beyond images may enable progress on 3D geometric and physical understanding and commonsense reasoning.
“training on multimodal and embodied data beyond images may enable progress on significant challenges (e.g., 3D geometric and physical understanding, commonsense reasoning)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMany applications not included in the report are as likely to be affected by foundation models as the included applications.
“many applications (e.g., natural sciences, music, finance, agriculture) are not included, though they are as likely to be affected as the applications we have chosen to discuss”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Some meaningful research can still be done by training smaller models within reach of an academic budget, and the surprisingly regularity predicted by scaling laws make this a viable strategy for cases where the differences due to scale are quantitative (e.g., accuracy goes up).
“Some meaningful research can still be done by training smaller models within reach of an academic budget, and indeed the surprisingly regularity predicted by scaling laws [Kaplan et al. 2020] make this a viable strategy for cases where the differences due to scale are quantitative (e.g., accuracy goes up).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaplan et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Plentiful data not specific to particular environments and across modalities may help bridge the robotics data gap.
“we explore how plentiful data (e.g., generic videos of humans, amongst others) that is not specific to particular environments and across modalities (e.g., language, vision) may help to bridge this gap”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models present clear potential to transform and extend AI across many sectors beyond the tech industry.
“Moving forward, foundation models present clear potential to transform and extend the reach of AI across many sectors beyond the tech industry”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The foundation model is only one component (though an increasingly important component) of an AI system.
“the foundation model is only one component (though an increasingly important component) of an AI system”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Since emergence generates substantial uncertainty over the capabilities and flaws of foundation models, aggressive homogenization through these models is risky business.
“Since emergence generates substantial uncertainty over the capabilities and flaws of foundation models, aggressive homogenization through these models is risky business.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 12 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The suitability of a technology relying largely on emergent behavior for widespread deployment to people is unclear.
“the suitability of a technology relying largely on emergent behavior for widespread deployment to people is unclear”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Computer vision led the adoption of deep learning in AI.
“Computer vision led the adoption of deep learning in AI [Russakovsky et al. 2015]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Russakovsky et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Academia has not been able to participate in the fullest way possible due to the loss in accessibility.
“Unfortunately, academia has not been able to participate in the fullest way possible due to the loss in accessibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models lower the difficulty threshold for prototyping and building AI applications due to their sample efficiency in adaptation.
“foundation models lower the difficulty threshold for prototyping and building AI applications due to their sample efficiency in adaptation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The technology behind foundation models is based on decades of research in machine learning, optimization, NLP, computer vision, and other fields.
“The technology behind foundation models is based on decades of research in machine learning, optimization, NLP, computer vision, and other fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 6 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Derisking is the central challenge in the further development of foundation models from an ethical and AI safety perspective.
“Derisking is the central challenge in the further development of foundation models from an ethical (§5.6: ethics) and AI safety (§4.9: ai-safety) perspective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The full range of linguistic variation poses an opportunity and challenge because some variants are data-limited.
“we emphasize the full range of linguistic variation (e.g., different styles, dialects, languages), which poses an opportunity and challenge given some variants are data-limited”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Market-driven commercial incentives can align well with social benefit: making foundation models more accurate, reliable, safe, and efficient while searching for a wide variety of potential use cases can produce a great deal of social utility.
“Market-driven commercial incentives can align well with social benefit: making foundation models more accurate, reliable, safe, and efficient while searching for a wide variety of potential use cases can produce a great deal of social utility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models raise the ceiling for novel user interaction due to their multimodal and generative capabilities.
“raise the ceiling for novel user interaction due to their multimodal and generative capabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Due to the emergent nature of foundation models, some functionalities like in-context learning have only been demonstrated in models of sufficient size, so scale is needed to even ask the right questions.
“due to the emergent nature of these foundation models, some functionalities like in-context learning have only been demonstrated in models of sufficient size, so scale is needed to even ask the right questions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The social impact of foundation models depends on the whole ecosystem.
“the social impact depends on the whole ecosystem”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The extra application-specific logic is crucial for mitigating harms.
“The extra application-specific logic is crucial for mitigating harms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The direct social impact of an AI system occurs when it is deployed to people.
“The direct social impact of an AI system occurs when it is deployed to people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are unfinished intermediate objects that can be adapted to many downstream applications, sometimes by an entirely different entity for unforeseen purposes.
“foundation models are unfinished intermediate objects that can be adapted to many downstream applications, sometimes by an entirely different entity for unforeseen purposes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Skepticism about the capacity of future foundation models to understand natural language may be premature, especially where models are trained on multi-modal data.
“Our tentative conclusion is that skepticism about the capacity of future foundation models to understand natural language may be premature, especially where the models are trained on multi-modal data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Any flaws in the foundation model are blindly inherited by all adapted models.
“any flaws in the model are blindly inherited by all adapted models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Language and vision have led the way with foundation models due to abundant raw data and virtual applications.
“Unlike language and vision, which have led the way with foundation models both due to the abundance of raw data to train these models on and the availability of virtual applications to apply these models to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Humans transfer knowledge across tasks, facilitating more efficient adaptation and abstract reasoning.
“humans also transfer knowledge across tasks, facilitating much more efficient adaptation and the ability to reason more abstractly”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Training foundation models on curated datasets is the celebrated centerpiece in AI research, though it is only one of many stages.
“Training foundationmodels on these curated datasets8 is the celebrated centerpiece in AI research, though it is only one of many stages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models acquire various capabilities that can power applications.
“Foundation models acquire various capabilities that can power applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The power of foundation models comes from their emergent qualities rather than their explicit construction.
“Since the power of foundation models comes from their emergent qualities rather than their explicit construction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There is a clear gap between current foundation model capabilities and those characterizing language as a complex system for human communication and thought.
“there is a clear gap between the capabilities these models acquire currently and those that characterize language as a complex system for human communication and thought”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenDespite their deployment into the real world, foundation models are very much research prototypes that are poorly understood.
“Despite their deployment into the real world, these models are very much research prototypes that are poorly understood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 10 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The long-standing and deeply-seated research mission of universities is the production and dissemination of knowledge and creation of global public goods.
“the long-standing and deeply-seated research mission of universities is the production and dissemination of knowledge and creation of global public goods [Kerr 2001; Rhoten and Calhoun 2011; Nussbaum 2010]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kerr 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rhoten and Calhoun 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nussbaum 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The combinatorial search space renders traditional search-based methods intractable.
“The combinatorial search space renders traditional search-based methods intractable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)NLP as a field has blazed the trail for foundation models.
“NLP as a field has blazed the trail for foundation models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Data creation is fundamentally a human-centric process: all data is created by people and most data is at least implicitly about people.
“Data creation is fundamentally a human-centric process: all data is created by people and most data is at least implicitly about people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 8 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)It is easier to reason about the social impact of specific systems deployed to specific users than it is to reason about the social impact of foundation models, which could be adapted to any number of unforeseen downstream systems.
“it is easier to reason about the social impact of specific systems deployed to specific users than it is to reason about the social impact of foundation models, which could be adapted to any number of unforeseen downstream systems”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationEven the professional norms around foundation models are underdeveloped.
“Even the professional norms — what Robert Merton calls the ethos of science [Merton 1979] — around foundation models are underdeveloped.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Merton 1979
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Many streams of data in education are individually too limited to train foundation models.
“while certain many streams of data in education are individually too limited to train foundation models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Existing foundation models have core limitations that require fundamental advances in provenance and factuality guarantees.
“highlights core limitations of existing foundation models that will require fundamental advances with respect to provenance for their behavior and guarantees for the factuality of their generation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFoundation models are now central to most NLP systems and research.
“Foundation models have had a huge impact on the field of NLP, and are now central to most NLP systems and research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The widespread adoption of foundation models poses ethical, political, and social concerns beyond inequity.
“the widespread adoption of foundation models poses other ethical, political and social concerns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Leveraging relevant data from outside the domain and across multiple modalities jointly offers hope for broadly applicable educational foundation models.
“the ability to leverage relevant data from outside the domain (e.g., the Internet) and make use of data across multiple modalities (e.g., textbooks, mathematical formula, diagrams, video-based tutorials) jointly offers hope for foundation models that are broadly applicable to educational tasks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Understanding the relationship between inequity and foundation models requires reckoning with the abstraction of foundation models.
“understanding the relationship between inequity and foundation models requires reckoning with the abstraction of foundation models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Language varies greatly, including within a single language or within a single speaker.
“Language varies greatly. Apart from the fact that there are thousands of different languages in the world, language varies even within one language or within one speaker.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The sample efficiency of adaptation for foundation models is of heightened value in the legal domain due to the costs of expert time and knowledge.
“the sample efficiency of adaptation for foundation models is of heightened value given the costs of expert time and knowledge in the legal domain”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Emergent behaviors of foundation models may complicate attempts to adapt them to particular tasks and may require new approaches for interpretability or evaluation.
“forecasting the emergent behaviors of foundation models (e.g., the ability to deceive or plan strategically), which may complicate attempts to adapt them to particular tasks, and may require new approaches for interpretability (§4.11: interpretability) or evaluation (§4.4: evaluation)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The rise of the foundation model paradigm has begun to play a similar role in spoken language as in written language.
“The rise of the foundation model paradigm has begun to play a similar role in spoken language as well as written.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Legal applications require attorneys to read and produce long coherent narratives that incorporate shifting contexts and decipher ambiguous legal standards.
“Legal applications require that attorneys read and produce long coherent narratives that incorporate shifting contexts and decipher ambiguous legal standards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLanguage is central to human thought, social and emotional relations, identity, knowledge recording, and societal intelligence.
“language is central to human thought, to how social and emotional relations are formed, to how we identify ourselves socially and personally, and to how humans record knowledge and develop societal intelligence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSpoken or signed languages arise in every human society.
“Spoken or signed languages arise in every human society”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Comrie 1989
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Healthcare tasks and biomedical research require expert knowledge that is limited and expensive.
“Healthcare tasks (e.g., patient care via disease treatment) and biomedical research (e.g., scientific discovery of new therapies) require expert knowledge that is limited and expensive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Social and political factors are embedded in how language variation is viewed and valued, and in how much different varieties are represented in NLP research.
“Social and political factors are embedded in how language variation is viewed and valued, and in howmuch different varieties are represented in NLP research”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blodgett and O'Connor 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are a high-leverage single point of failure, making them a prime target for attack.
“Fundamentally, foundation models are a high-leverage single point of failure, making them a prime target for attack”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models' generative capabilities are well-suited to many generative tasks required in law.
“their generative capabilities are well-suited to themany generative tasks required in law”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Data and model size appear to reliably track with improvements in capabilities.
“both of which appear to reliably track with improvements in capabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLanguages are complex yet efficient systems, acquired consistently by children in a short amount of time, and evolve to encompass changing needs of linguistic communities.
“Languages are remarkably complex yet efficient systems, acquired consistently by children in a short amount of time, and which evolve and encompass the changing needs and conditions of linguistic communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningLanguage understanding and generation is a critical element of research in artificial intelligence.
“language understanding and generation is a critical element of research in artificial intelligence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are byproducts of computationally expensive training regimes.
“Foundation models are the byproducts of computationally expensive training regimes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are likely to have substantial economic impact due to their novel capabilities and potential applications across industries and occupations.
“Foundation models are likely to have substantial economic impact due to their novel capabilities and potential applications in a wide variety of industries and occupations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOn the NY Regents 8th grade science exam, the best system in 2018 scored 73.1%, while an adapted foundation model in 2019 scored 91.6%.
“To take just one example, the best system for answering open-ended science questions in 2018, before foundation models, could get 73.1% on the NY Regents 8th grade science exam. A year later in 2019, an adapted foundation model scored 91.6% [Clark et al. 2019].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clark et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Multimodality, memory capacity, and compositionality may be essential for the next generation of foundation models.
“attributes may be essential for the next generation of models, including:multimodallity — to consume, process and potentially produce content from different sources and domains, memory capacity — to effectively store and retrieve the acquired knowledge, and finally, compositionality, to foster successful generalization to novel settings and environments”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Recent work suggests that lightweight fine-tuning alternatives and prompting-based methods may achieve favorable accuracy-efficiency tradeoffs.
“with recent work suggesting that lightweight fine-tuning alternatives and prompting-based methods may achieve favorable accuracy-efficiency tradeoffs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The transformer network successfully realizes expressivity and scalability and underpins most foundation models to date.
“These properties are successfully realized by existing architectures such as the transformer network [Vaswani et al. 2017] that underpins most foundation models to date.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vaswani et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Recent calls for data-centric AI indicate the pervasive importance of managing, understanding, and documenting data used to train machine learning models.
“recent calls for data-centric AI [Press 2021; Ré 2021] indicate the pervasive importance of managing, understanding, and documenting data used to train machine learning models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Press 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ré 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHistorically, NLP focused on defining and engineering systems for challenging linguistic tasks, with task-specific architectures and pipelines.
“The field of NLP has historically focused on defining and engineering systems for challenging linguistic tasks, with the vision that models that are good at these tasks will lead to competent language systems for downstream applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jurafsky and Martin 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe languages of the world are diverse in expression and structure but exhibit surprising concordance in richness.
“the languages of the world are both incredibly diverse in the ways that they express and structure the information they convey, while also exhibiting surprising concordance in the richness of what makes a language [Comrie 1989]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Comrie 1989
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The energy required for training foundation models coincides with the release of more carbon into the atmosphere and the degradation of the environment.
“the energy required for this training coincides with the release of more carbon into the atmosphere and the degradation of the environment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Effective teaching involves reasoning about student cognition and should reflect the learning goals of students.
“effective teaching involves reasoning about student cognition and should reflect the learning goals of students”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)New capabilities of foundation models may limit existing human detection methods for harmful content.
“these new capabilities may limit existing human detection methods for harmful content (e.g., tracking similar text across different sources)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The deep neural networks that underpin foundation models are opaque.
“the opacity of the deep neural networks that underpin foundation models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are intermediary assets that are adapted for applications that impact users.
“foundation models are intermediary assets that are adapted for applications that impact users”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The expected ubiquity of foundation models heightens the need to understand these models and their capabilities.
“alongside the expected ubiquity of foundation models, heightens the need to understand these models and their capabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)For foundation models to significantly contribute to healthcare, law, and education, they require specific capabilities and technical innovation.
“For foundation models to significantly contribute to these application domains, models will require specific capabilities (§2: capabilities) as well as technical innovation (§4: technology) to account for the unique considerations in each domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are intermediary assets that are unfinished and generally should not be used directly, instead requiring adaptation for specific downstream tasks.
“Foundation models are intermediary assets; they are unfinished and generally should not be used directly, instead requiring adaptation for specific downstream tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models may enable more sample efficient adaptation to sensitive data distributions, so privacy-preserving applications may incur less degradation in accuracy.
“by leveraging knowledge transfer from public data, foundation models may enable more sample efficient adaptation to sensitive data distributions, i.e., privacy-preserving applications may incur less degradation in accuracy when built using foundation models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are not a panacea for robustness; challenges such as extrapolation across time and spurious correlations are not likely to be fully addressed.
“we do not believe that foundation models are a panacea for robustness — challenges such as extrapolation across time and spurious correlations are not likely to be fully addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 14 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models come with clear risks in healthcare, such as exacerbating historical biases in medical datasets and trials.
“Simultaneously, they come with clear risks (e.g., exacerbating historical biases in medical datasets and trials).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 20 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models may themselves provide promising potential as automated misuse detectors.
“foundation models may themselves provide promising potential as automated misuse detectors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The focus of NLP research and practice has shifted from bespoke architectures to leveraging foundation models.
“Due to the changes brought about by the foundation model paradigm, the focus of research and practice in NLP has shifted from making bespoke architectures for different tasks to exploring how to best leverage foundation models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Ample data exists in the form of legal documents.
“ample data exists in the form of legal documents”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 18 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are task agnostic, which makes them both exciting and troubling.
“What makes these models so exciting and also so troubling is their task agnosticity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 16 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Significant improvements are required for foundation models to reliably reason over various sources of information and generate truthful long-form documents.
“significant improvements are required for foundation models to be able to reliably reason over various sources of information to generate truthful long-form documents”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Modern ASR models like wav2vec 2.0 are trained on large speech audio datasets alone and then adapted on audio with transcriptions for ASR.
“Modern automatic speech recognition (ASR) models like wav2vec 2.0 are trained on large datasets of speech audio alone, and then adapted on audio with associated transcriptions for the task of ASR [Baevski et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baevski et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)In many multilingual corpora, English data is orders of magnitude more abundant than lower-resource language data and is often cleaner, broader, and contains examples showcasing more linguistic depth and complexity.
“in many multilingual corpora, English data is not only orders of magnitude more abundant than that of lower-resource languages, but it is often cleaner, broader, and contains examples showcasing more linguistic depth and complexity [Caswell et al. 2021]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caswell et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 26 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Most complex NLP tasks that the research community focused on before foundation models are now best handled, to an almost-human level, using one of a few publicly released foundation models.
“Most of the complex NLP tasks that the research community focused on before foundation models are now best handled, to an almost-human level, using one of a few publicly released foundation models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 26 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models have drastically changed the research and practice of NLP.
“Foundation models have drastically changed the research and practice of NLP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Fula has over 65 million speakers but few if any NLP resources.
“To give one example, there are over 65 million speakers of Fula, a West African language, but few if any resources available for NLP in Fula [Nguer et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguer et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)GShard neural machine translation results show the largest gains over monolingual baselines for the lowest resource languages, with gains increasing with model size.
“Moreover, the results for the (non-public) GShard neural machine translation model show the largest gains over monolingual baselines for the lowest resource languages, with the gains increasing with model size [Lepikhin et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lepikhin et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGibson suggested human vision is inherently embodied and interactive ecological environments may play a key role in its development.
“Gibson [1979] suggested that human vision is inherently embodied and interactive ecological environments may play a key role in its development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gibson 1979
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models have made progress in creating NLP systems that act more like humans, but their acquired linguistic system and learning process still differ significantly from human language.
“Though foundation models have constituted a huge source of progress in creating NLP systems that act more like humans, there are still significant ways in which the linguistic system that they acquire, as well as the learning process, differ from human language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 26 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There remain significant gaps between current foundation model performance and the needs for useful and safe deployment in complex downstream settings.
“Nevertheless, there remain significant gaps between this performance and the needs for useful and safe deployment of foundation models in complex downstream settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 26 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The linguistic system of foundation models is mostly set by training data and is relatively static.
“On the other hand, the linguistic system of foundation models is mostly set by the training data, and is relatively static [Lazaridou et al. 2021; Khandelwal et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lazaridou et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Khandelwal et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Powerful ungrounded statistical learning is present in babies and is an important factor in acquisition.
“Powerful ungrounded statistical learning is indeed also present in babies [Saffran et al. 1996], so it is no doubt an important factor in acquisition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saffran et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 24 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models like GPT-3 are trained on around three to four orders of magnitude more language data than most humans will ever hear or read.
“Human language acquisition is very efficient: foundation models like GPT-3 are trained on around three to four orders of magnitude more language data than most humans will ever hear or read, and certainly much more than children have been exposed to by the time they are mostly linguistically competent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe ability to see enables near-constant, long-range gathering of dense signals, a critical capability developed over evolutionary time in diverse life forms.
“The ability to see enables the near-constant, long-range gathering of dense signals, a critical capability developed over an evolutionary time-scale in a diverse range of life forms [Parker 2003; Zhang and Shu 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Parker 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhang and Shu 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenRobot control is a high-dimensional and closed-loop decision-making problem: the actions a robot takes directly influence what it perceives next, which in turn influences the next robot action.
“This is a high-dimensional and closed-loop decision-making problem: the actions that a robot takes directly influence what it perceives next, which in turn influences the next robot action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Visual scenes and objects have a natural regularity to their physical dynamics and geometric properties.
“visual scenes and objects have a natural regularity to their physical dynamics and geometric properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Modeling richer event dynamics in long-range video sequences seems daunting, especially with additional modalities and increasing resolutions.
“In this context, modeling the richer event dynamics in long-range video sequences seems like a daunting endeavor, especially with additional modalities (e.g., speech, optical flow, etc.) and increasing resolutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Humans have a remarkable capacity for generalizing visual understanding to unseen compositions and reasoning about physical and geometric properties of novel objects and scenes.
“Humans have a remarkable capacity for generalizing visual understanding to unseen compositions, and reasoning about the physical and geometric properties of novel objects and scenes [Lake et al. 2015].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lake et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Fréchet Inception Distance suffers from known flaws.
“Standard metrics like Fréchet Inception Distance, suffer from known flaws [Bińkowski et al. 2018]; such issues”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bińkowski et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Continued incorporation of multiple modalities (e.g., audio) in foundation models may prove beneficial towards these aims.
“Indeed, the continued incorporation of multiple modalities (e.g., audio) in foundation models may prove beneficial towards these aims [Zhang et al. 2017; Gao et al. 2020b; Jaegle et al. 2021a].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gao et al. 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jaegle et al. 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Other neural models infer visual properties of objects and scenes without explicit annotated supervision by using variational auto-encoding, contrastive learning or other self-supervised techniques.
“Other neural models infer the visual properties of objects and scenes without explicitly annotated supervision, by employing variational auto-encoding, contrastive learning or other self-supervised techniques [e.g., Kingma and Welling 2014; Chen et al. 2020c; He et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kingma and Welling 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chen et al. 2020c
Not checked in the free run.
- cites He et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA common choice for policy parameterization is a function that maps task representation and environment observation to robot actions.
“While policies can be parameterized in different ways, a common choice is that of a function that maps the task representation and environment observation (e.g., a scene image from a fixed or egocentric camera, or inputs from alternative sensors like LIDAR) to robot actions [Andrychowicz et al. 2017; Nair et al. 2018].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Andrychowicz et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nair et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There is a well-documented history of learned bias in computer vision models, resulting in lower accuracies and correlated errors for underrepresented groups, with consequently inappropriate and premature deployment to some real-world settings.
“There is a well-documented history of learned bias in computer vision models, resulting in lower accuracies and correlated errors for underrepresented groups, with consequently inappropriate and premature deployment to some real-world settings [e.g., Buolamwini and Gebru 2018, §5.1: fairness].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buolamwini and Gebru 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Perceptual understanding in humans is linked to embodiment and interactive, ecological settings.
“classic studies have suggested that perceptual understanding in humans is linked to its embodiment and interactive, ecological settings [Gibson 1979].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gibson 1979
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Current vision models often process embeddings that summarize image patches or groups of frames, with the potential drawback of losing fine-grained details.
“Current vision models [e.g., Radford et al. 2021; Sun et al. 2019a; Tan and Bansal 2019; Kim et al. 2021a] often address this by processing embeddings that summarize image patches or even groups of frames altogether, but this has the potential drawback of losing fine-grained details [Ramesh et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sun et al. 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tan and Bansal 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Many learning tasks in computer vision and natural language processing rely on large and diverse offline datasets that can easily be scraped from the web.
“On the other hand, many learning tasks in computer vision and natural language processing rely on large and diverse offline datasets that can easily be scraped from the web.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Higher-order vision goals such as physical scene understanding, visual commonsense reasoning, temporal events, and social affordances have been goals for fully-supervised systems but have proven challenging partly due to difficulty of annotating at scale.
“Each of these have been goals for fully-supervised systems, but have proven challenging in part due to the difficulty of annotating these tasks at scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 32 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Having human judgements as part of evaluation incurs significant cost and may not be as scalable.
“Having human judgements as part of evaluation may be one route, but incurs significant cost and may not be as scalable [Zhou et al. 2019; Khashabi et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zhou et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Khashabi et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningHigh-level context-dependent goals do not stand alone and can introduce a multitude of ambiguities.
“In general, high-level context-dependent goals like these do not stand alone and can introduce a multitude of ambiguities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Current foundation models have shown promising capability for image synthesis and early results for generalization to fine-grained language inputs, but still struggle to generalize to compositions of simple shapes and colors.
“While current foundation models have shown promising capability for image synthesis and early results for generalization to fine-grained language inputs, these models still struggle to generalize to compositions of simple shapes and colors [Ramesh et al. 2021; Radford et al. 2021; Rong 2021].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ramesh et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rong 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe closed-loop aspect of robot control is not traditionally studied in language and computer vision, where large offline datasets are dominant and foundation models have already seen success.
“This closed-loop aspect is not traditionally studied in language and computer vision, where large offline datasets are dominant and foundation models have already seen success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Learning a policy for a robot that perceives state via sensors and takes actions to accomplish tasks traditionally requires large datasets of the robot interacting in the real world.
“Learning a policy for a robot that perceives the state of its environment via sensors and takes actions to accomplish tasks traditionally requires large datasets of the robot interacting in the real world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Language foundation models have been able to capture a degree of commonsense over language events, suggesting a potential avenue for similar capability over multimodal visual inputs.
“Related progress in language foundation models (§2.1: language), which have been able to capture a degree of commonsense over language events [Brown et al. 2020], also suggests a potential avenue towards achieving similar capability over multimodal visual inputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The most natural way to describe a task can vary depending on the user, environment, or task.
“As the most natural way to describe a task can vary depending on the user, environment, or task, robotic foundation models for task specification should accept a variety of description modalities, such as goal states [Fu et al. 2018; Singh et al. 2019], natural language [MacGlashan et al. 2015; Karamcheti et al. 2017; Misra et al. 2017b; Co-Reyes et al. 2019; Shao et al. 2020], videos of humans [S”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 36 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Reliably transforming task descriptions into generalizable reward signals for robot learning remains an open problem.
“Reliably transforming task descriptions into generalizable reward signals for robot learning remains an open problem [Taylor et al. 2016] — one that robotic foundation models will arguably be well suited for.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenProblems in robotics do not easily conform to a one-size-fits-all model, since different problems have different input-output signatures, in contrast to domains like NLP where many problems can be cast into a general text-in, text-out signature.
“Robotic foundation models could take a variety of forms: problems in robotics do not easily conform to a one-size-fits-all model, since different problems have different input-output signatures — a contrast to domains like NLP where many problems can be cast into a general “text-in, text-out” signature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 30 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)For visual synthesis, DALL-E and CLIP-guided generation leverage multimodal language and vision input to render compelling visual scenes.
“For visual synthesis, notable examples include DALL-E [Ramesh et al. 2021] and CLIP-guided generation [Radford et al. 2021; Galatolo et al. 2021], where researchers leverage multimodal language and vision input to render compelling visual scenes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ramesh et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Galatolo et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)With foundation models, one can model the distribution of the optimal decisions and generate suitable candidates to proceed to the next step.
“Instead, with foundation models, one can model the distribution of the optimal decisions, and generate suitable candidates to proceed to the next step.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMany reasoning problems pose unbounded search spaces, where systems must deal with numerous kinds of open-ended alternatives.
“Many reasoning problems pose unbounded search spaces, where systems must deal with numerous kinds of open-ended alternatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDesigning novel and positive forms of human-AI interaction remains difficult.
“Despite the monumental progress in machine learning algorithms and systems infrastructure, some point out that designing novel and positive forms of human-AI interaction remains difficult [Dove et al. 2017; Cooper et al. 2014].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dove et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cooper et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe search space of the game of Go is considered much smaller than that of mathematics.
“This contrasts with more structured AI challenges such as the game of Go, whose search space is considered much smaller.17”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn reasoning problems, a system can perform any number of actions at each step, and the search space only grows larger as the diagram grows more complicated.
“A system can perform any number of actions at each step of reasoning. For instance, the system could add a new auxiliary point with an arbitrary construction, say a perpendicular line, a parallel line, or a tangent circle, and the search space only grows larger as the diagram grows more complicated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Collecting data in the physical world that covers diverse environments and embodiments at scale is a sizable hurdle.
“Collecting data in the physical world that covers diverse environments and embodiments at scale is a sizable hurdle, and ensuring the safety and robustness of such systems is equally exigent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Simulation presents a boundless source of rich interactive data that robots can learn from, with a range of sensor modalities like rendered visuals, point-clouds, and simulated touch/audio.
“Finally, simulation presents a boundless source of rich interactive data that robots can learn from, with a range of sensor modalities like rendered visuals, point-clouds, and simulated touch/audio.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn some cases, the line between developers and users will start to blur, and users may be able to easily develop their own AI applications, for instance with natural language.
“In some cases, the line between developers and users will start to blur, and users may be able to easily develop their own AI applications, for instance with natural language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFoundation models will bring significant opportunities to developers by lowering the difficulty threshold for building AI-infused applications, and to application users by raising the ceiling for what types of interactions are achievable.
“Foundation models will bring significant opportunities to developers by lowering the difficulty threshold for building AI-infused applications, and to the application users by raising the ceiling for what types of interactions are achievable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)As foundation models offer a generic way of modeling the output space as a sequence, the next decision generation is entirely unconstrained and hence universal.
“In particular, as foundation models offer a generic way of modeling the output space as a sequence, the next decision generation is entirely unconstrained and hence universal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)External, non-robotic data such as videos of humans or existing vision and natural language datasets is diverse and exists in large quantities on the web.
“Such data is diverse and exists in large quantities on the web [Deng et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2012; Heilbron et al. 2015; Goyal et al. 2017a; Damen et al. 2018; Gao et al. 2020a; Grauman et al. 2021], affording the possibility of broad generalization if properly leveraged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Deng et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lee et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Heilbron et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLarge language models offered a generic way of modeling the output space as a sequence, allowing the generation of arbitrary kinds of actions, and quickly became a more favorable choice.
“Because large language models offered a generic way of modeling the output space as a sequence, they quickly became a more favorable choice, allowing the generation of arbitrary kinds of actions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs foundation models mature, their capacity will continue to expand and their versatility may lead to fundamental changes in how we interact with AI by allowing rapid prototyping and building of highly dynamic and generative AI-infused applications.
“As the development of foundation models matures, the models' capacity will continue to expand and their versatility may ultimately lead to fundamental changes in how we interact with AI by allowing us to rapidly prototype and build highly dynamic and generative AI-infused applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn these reasoning problems, a simulated environment is often provided, which allows a solver to run several search threads towards building the solution tree.
“In these problems, a simulated environment is often provided, which allows a solver to run several search threads towards building the solution tree.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Existing foundation models are not trained to generate high-level plans; they often focus solely on predicting the next low-level steps.
“Existing foundation models are not trained to generate such high-level plans. Instead, they often focus solely on predicting the next low-level steps [Polu and Sutskever 2020; Han et al. 2021; Chen et al. 2021f].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Polu and Sutskever 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Han et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chen et al. 2021f
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe simulator often provides intermediate feedback, and the solver needs to select the most promising search thread and proceed based on that feedback.
“The simulator often provides intermediate feedback, say, informing the solver with the remaining propositions to establish before the proof is considered complete. The solver in turn needs to select the most promising search thread and proceed based on the intermediate feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Building a foundation model will encourage a unifying framework of constructing a suite of self-supervised tasks that can be applied to all reasoning problems.
“Building a foundation model will encourage a unifying framework of constructing a suite of self-supervised tasks that can be applied to all reasoning problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models can reduce the complexity of the learning problem in the adaptation phase, improving sample complexity and generalization.
“Thus, foundation models can reduce the complexity of the learning problem in the adaptation phase, improving sample complexity and generalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThese reasoning problems tend to exhibit similar structure, like the bijection between retrosynthesis in drug discovery and theorem proving in propositional logic.
“These reasoning problems tend to exhibit similar structure, like the bijection between retrosynthesis in drug discovery and theorem proving in propositional logic, illustrated in Figure 10: in both problems, one is building a tree of synthesis, whose nodes are chemical products on the one side and propositions on the other, and the leaf nodes are the products on the one side, and end axioms on the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Ensuring the safety and robustness of robotic foundation models is equally exigent as collecting data at scale.
“Collecting data in the physical world that covers diverse environments and embodiments at scale is a sizable hurdle, and ensuring the safety and robustness of such systems is equally exigent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Aligned multi-modal data in reasoning is scarce.
“However, aligned multi-modal data in reasoning is scarce, and it remains an open question whether foundation models can discover connections between different modalities in an unsupervised manner (e.g., discovering of commutative diagram with the corresponding algebraic equations).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 38 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Elegantly addressing the gap between the robot's domain and those found in videos or language on the web remains an open challenge.
“Elegantly addressing the gap between the robot's domain and those found in videos or language on the web remains an open challenge; however, recent progress in domain adaptation [Smith et al. 2019; Schmeckpeper et al. 2020] and using pretrained video and language models in robotics [Lynch and Sermanet 2020; Shao et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2021c] present promising directions towards closing this gap.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Data for high-level reasoning is scarce and difficult to collect in general, though it exists in limited settings.
“Although such data does exist in limited settings [Li et al. 2021b], in general, data for high-level reasoning is scarce and difficult to collect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al. 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 42 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Symbols in reasoning have deep underlying semantic meanings.
“However, these symbols have deep underlying semantic meanings — saying “isosceles triangle” paints a vivid image in the human mind.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn the future, we may find it desirable to hold artificial agents accountable for the language they produce, and language understanding may emerge as a prerequisite.
“Not unrelated to the previous points, in the future we may find it desirable to hold artificial agents in some way accountable for the language they produce [The HAI Adaptive Agents Group 2021]. Depending on howwe think about concepts like accountability, responsibility, agency, and the like, language understanding may emerge as a prerequisite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites The HAI Adaptive Agents Group 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe best foundation models at present can consume and produce language with striking fluency, but they invariably lapse into incoherence that suggests they are merely 'stochastic parrots'.
“The best foundation models at present can consume and produce language with striking fluency, but they invariably lapse into the sort of incoherence that suggests they are merely”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bender et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The question of whether a foundation model could understand language in principle takes on a very different character depending on which metaphysical characterization is adopted.
“The question of whether or not a foundation model could understand language in principle takes on a very different character depending on which of these metaphysical characterizations we adopt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Agreeing on appropriate targets for testing understanding is very difficult.
“Of course, agreeing on appropriate targets is very difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models will be used to enrich static multimedia and may lead to new forms of multi-modal interactions using interfaces that mix different modalities, such as visual and gesture-based interaction.
“Moreover, foundation models will be used to enrich static multimedia (e.g., automatically remastering legacy multimedia content into new formats, or generating unique experiences for each player in new video games) and may even lead to new forms of multi-modal interactions using interfaces that themselves mix different modalities, such as visual and gesture-based interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSome of our goals in deployment may only be met to the extent that the model is capable of understanding.
“Some of our goals in deployment may only be met to the extent that the model is capable of understanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth healthcare and biomedical research demand significant expenses, time, and comprehensive medical knowledge.
“Both healthcare (which focuses on the delivery of care to patients via diagnosis, treatment, and health administration) and biomedical research (which focuses on the scientific understanding of disease and the discovery of new therapies) demand significant expenses, time, and comprehensive medical knowledge [Yu et al. 2018; Korngiebel and Mooney 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Yu et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Korngiebel and Mooney 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Drug development typically takes over 10 years and costs more than one billion dollars.
“drug development involves a complex process, from basic drug research of protein target identification and potent molecule discovery to clinical development (e.g., clinical trials) to the final drug approval, which typically takes over 10 years and costs more than one billion dollars [Wouters et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wouters et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)A positive feature of pragmatism is that, by identifying success with the manifestation of concrete behaviors, there is no great conceptual puzzle about how to test for it.
“A positive feature of pragmatism is that, by identifying success with the manifestation of concrete behaviors, there is no great conceptual puzzle about how to test for it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHealthcare expenditures account for 17% of gross domestic product (GDP) in the US.
“expenditures accounting for 17% of gross domestic product (GDP) in the US [Swensen et al. 2011; van Hartskamp et al. 2019; Keehan et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Swensen et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van Hartskamp et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Keehan et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)If input symbol streams include diverse digital traces of things in the world (images, audio, sensors, etc.), then co-occurrence patterns might contain enough information for the model to induce high-fidelity proxies for the required mapping.
“However, if the input symbol streams include diverse digital traces of things in the world – images, audio, sensors, etc. – then the co-occurrence patterns might contain enough information for the model to induce high-fidelity proxies for the required mapping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)This will place a large burden on groups utilizing foundation models to monitor their models' behavior and adapt them to act in appropriate ways.
“This will place a large burden on the groups utilizing foundation models to monitor their models' behavior, and to the extent possible, adapt them to act in appropriate ways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore work is still needed to overcome obstacles in designing human-AI interaction.
“However, more work is still needed to overcome these obstacles [Yang et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There may be some suite of behaviors that is our real target for understanding, but it is hard to circumscribe or turn into a practical test.
“There may be some suite of behaviors that is our real target, but it is just hard to circumscribe or turn into a practical test.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningOur epistemology of understanding depends to some extent on our metaphysics of understanding.
“Our epistemology thus depends to some extent on our metaphysics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIt is by no means obvious that foundation models alone could ever achieve understanding, but neither do we know of definitive reasons to think they could not.
“It is by no means obvious that foundation models alone could ever achieve understanding, but neither do we know of definitive reasons to think they could not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)With the possibility of learning understanding still open, we face the difficult epistemological challenge of clarifying how we could hope to evaluate potential success.
“With this possibility thus still open, we face the difficult epistemological challenge of clarifying how we could hope to evaluate potential success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 52 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)If foundation models are pursued as a path to language understanding in artificial agents, then multimodal training regimes may well be the most viable strategy, as they would seem the most likely to provide the model with the requisite information.
“Nonetheless, the above discussion does invite one practical conclusion: if foundation models are pursued as a path to language understanding in artificial agents, then multimodal training regimes may well be the most viable strategy, as they would seem the most likely to provide the model with the requisite information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Today, the line that separates developers of AI models and end-users is rigid - it is rarely the case that an end-user has the data, computing resources, and expertise to develop a new model that suits one's values and needs well.
“Today, the line that separates the developers of AI models and end-users is rigid — it is rarely the case that an end-user has the data, computing resources, and expertise to be able to develop a new model that suits one's values and needs well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 52 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)To address the question of whether foundation models will understand language, one must resolve a difficult metaphysical question about which there are a number of substantively distinct views.
“To even begin to address the question, one must resolve a difficult metaphysical question about which there are a number of substantively distinct views.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningA foundation model might be trained on a wide range of different symbols: not just language but also computer code, database files, images, audio, and sensor readings.
“A foundation model might be trained on a wide range of different symbols: not just language but also computer code, database files, images, audio, and sensor readings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 52 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There are no easy answers to the question of whether foundation models will ever understand language.
“It seems clear that there are no easy answers to the question of whether foundation models will ever understand language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationThe powerful generative and potentially multi-modal capabilities of foundation models could offer a far higher ceiling of what types of interactions are achievable in terms of quality and diversity.
“At the same time, the powerful generative and potentially multi-modal capabilities of foundation models could offer a far higher”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Myers et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The scenario Bender and Koller describe is one in which some crucial information for understanding is taken to be missing, and a simple behavioral test reveals this.
“Fundamentally, the scenario Bender and Koller describe is one in which some crucial information for understanding is taken to be missing, and a simple behavioral test reveals this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningUnderstanding might be taken as a necessary condition for trust in the context of language use.
“On the whole, then, understanding might be taken as a necessary condition for trust in the context of language use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation30% of healthcare spending may be wasteful due to administrative inefficiency and preventable medical errors.
“studies estimate that 30% of healthcare spending may be wasteful due to administrative inefficiency and preventable medical errors [Kocher 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kocher 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent work has shown that it can be difficult to make models like GPT-3 consistently perform the intended task, and understanding what it is capable of is still an active area of research.
“Indeed, recent work has shown that it can be difficult to make models like GPT-3 consistently perform the intended task [Reynolds and McDonell 2021], while understanding what it is capable of is still an active area of research [Hendrycks et al. 2021a].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Reynolds and McDonell 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hendrycks et al. 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The powerful in-context learning capabilities that foundation models will exhibit may allow foundation model-powered applications to more effectively optimize their interfaces on a per-user basis.
“In addition, the powerful in-context learning capabilities that foundation models will exhibit may allow foundation model-powered applications to more effectively optimize their interfaces on a per-user basis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThere is no obvious sense in which self-supervision tells the model anything about what the symbols mean.
“There is no obvious sense in which this kind of self-supervision tells the model anything about what the symbols mean.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)On the internalist view, a fairly robust kind of internal/causal interpretability is at least strongly suggested.
“On the internalist view, by contrast, a fairly robust kind of internal/causal interpretability is at least strongly suggested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe mere possibility that understanding will play an indispensable role in trust, interpretability, or accountability provides strong motivation to develop a framework for theorizing about it.
“The mere possibility that understanding will play an indispensable role in any of these matters provides strong motivation to develop a framework for theorizing about it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)While a generic model could be sufficient in some cases, recent years have seen an increasing number of scenarios in which such models fail to serve users.
“While a generic model (i.e., one that is not specific to a specific user or community) could be sufficient in some cases, recent years have seen an increasing number of scenarios in which such models fail to serve users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThese associations might reflect important aspects of the world we inhabit and the language we use to talk about it.
“These associations might reflect important aspects of the world we inhabit and the language we use to talk about it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere is arguably one defining characteristic shared by all foundation models: they are self-supervised.
“However, there is arguably one defining characteristic shared by all foundation models: they are self-supervised.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The ability for end-users to be involved in developing AI-infused applications is an exciting opportunity that could introduce a new paradigm for how we will interact with these applications in the future.
“Nonetheless, the ability for end-users to be involved in developing AI-infused applications is an exciting opportunity that could introduce a new paradigm for how we will interact with these applications in the future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 52 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There may be fundamental limitations on what we can learn from practical experiments about the inner workings of a complex foundation model, but these structural evaluation methods will be useful whenever our target aligns with internalism or referentialism.
“There may be fundamental limitations on what we can learn from practical experiments about the inner workings of a complex foundation model, but it is clear that these methods will be useful whenever our target aligns with internalism or referentialism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSkepticism about the capacity of future models to understand natural language may be premature.
“Ultimately, we conclude that skepticism about the capacity of future models to understand natural language may be premature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningFoundation models pose important opportunities to address many of the challenges in designing human-AI interaction.
“Foundation models pose important opportunities to address many of the challenges mentioned above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn self-supervision, the model's sole objective is to learn abstract co-occurrence patterns in the sequences of symbols it was trained on.
“In self-supervision, the model's sole objective is to learn abstract co-occurrence patterns in the sequences of symbols it was trained on.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)A novel disease outbreak such as COVID-19 costs millions of lives and trillions of dollars.
“a novel disease outbreak such as COVID-19 costs millions of lives and trillions of dollars [Lalmuanawma et al. 2020; McKibbin et al. 2020]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lalmuanawma et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McKibbin et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 46 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models are trained on observed data and do not necessarily inform us about causality.
“Of particular relevance to this last question is the fact that foundation models are trained on observed data and do not necessarily inform us about causality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHow successfully we can leverage foundation models' capacities will depend on how effectively we can wrangle them into forms more manageable by application developers.
“However, how successfully we can leverage these capacities will depend on how effectively we can wrangle foundation models into forms that will be more manageable by application developers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 50 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)In the terms defined, the inability to refer is taken to entail that the agent is not in the right dispositional state for understanding.
“In the terms we have defined, the inability to refer is taken to entail that the agent is not in the right dispositional state for understanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHealthcare cost increases every year.
“Currently, healthcare cost increases every year [Keehan et al. 2020]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keehan et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the United States, there are over 1.3 million lawyers.
“In the United States,31 there are over 1.3M lawyers [American Bar Association 2021]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites American Bar Association 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPublic defenders are often overworked and underfunded.
“public defenders, for example, are often overworked and underfunded [Lefstein and Spagenberg 2009; Schumm 2012; American Bar Association 2004].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lefstein and Spagenberg 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schumm 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites American Bar Association 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models' generativity can improve the search space and efficiency, reducing experiments and helping discover new and better drugs.
“Foundation models' generativity can improve the search space and efficiency (see §2.4: reasoning), which not only reduces the amount of experiments but also helps to discover new and better drugs [Jin et al. 2018; You et al. 2018; Walters and Barzilay 2020; Stokes et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Jin et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites You et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Walters and Barzilay 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Foundation models have a strong generative capability, such as coherent text generation in GPT-3.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 2007, 73% of county-based public defender offices exceeded the maximum recommended limit of cases received per attorney and 15 of 19 reporting state public defender programs exceeded the maximum recommended limit of felony or misdemeanor cases per attorney.
“The U.S. Department of Justice reported that in 2007, 73% of county-based public defender offices exceeded the maximum recommended limit of cases received per attorney and 15 of 19 reporting state public defender programs exceeded the maximum recommended limit of felony or misdemeanor cases per attorney [Farole and Langston 2010; Langston and Farole 2010].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Farole and Langston 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Langston and Farole 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Current self-supervised models are developed for each modality and do not jointly learn from diverse modalities.
“Current self-supervised models are developed for each modality (e.g., text [Lee et al. 2020b], image [Chaitanya et al. 2020], gene [Ji et al. 2021], protein [Jumper et al. 2020]), and do not jointly learn from diverse modalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lee et al. 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chaitanya et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ji et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Explainability is crucial in healthcare and biomedicine and is made obligatory under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
“Explainability — providing evidence and logical steps for decision making — is crucial in healthcare and biomedicine [Holzinger et al. 2019], and is made obligatory under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Holzinger et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites GDPR
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRoughly 86% of low-income individuals with civil legal problems in the United States report receiving inadequate or no legal help.
“Roughly 86% of low-income individuals with civil legal problems in the United States, for instance, report receiving inadequate or no legal help [Legal Services Corporation 2017].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Legal Services Corporation 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Foundation models can help predict potential failures and design promising clinical trial protocols, and automate matching of eligible patients.
“Foundation models can help in the following: predicting potential failures and design promising clinical trial protocols (e.g., patient eligibility criteria) based on existing studies; and automating matching of eligible patients based on patient individual profiles, which are multimodal data including EHRs, gene sequence, etc. [Harrer et al. 2019].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrer et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)A wide variety of work has examined automated contract drafting and review.
“A wide variety of work has also examined automated contract drafting and review, a task that could similarly benefit from foundation models [Hendrycks et al. 2021c; Betts and Jaep 2017].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hendrycks et al. 2021c
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Betts and Jaep 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 56 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Use of patient health records must observe privacy laws, such as HIPAA in the US.
“the use of patient health records must observe the privacy laws, such as HIPAA [Act 1996] in the case of the US.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Act 1996
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnnual revenues for legal services exceed $300 billion.
“annual revenues for legal services exceed $300B [MarketLine 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MarketLine 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Tippett et al. [2021] predict the outcome of a legal proceeding based on features extracted from filed briefs.
“Tippett et al. [2021] predict the outcome of a legal proceeding based on features extracted from the filed briefs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tippett et al. [2021]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Other work uses pretrained models for improved legal question answering to power commonly used legal search engines and help lawyers conduct legal research.
“Other work uses pretrained models for improved legal question answering to power commonly used legal search engines and help lawyers conduct legal research [Vold and Conrad 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vold and Conrad 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)A failure of a foundation model in the law will have real, damaging consequences to both clients and attorneys.
“a failure of a foundation model in the law will have real, damaging consequences to both clients and attorneys”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the United States, private education debt held by students has reached $1.6 trillion, surpassing total credit card debt.
“In the United States, one symptom is that private education debt held by students has reached $1.6 trillion, surpassing total credit card debt [Friedman 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 68 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Loneliness is on the rise in younger generations.
“Loneliness is on the rise in younger generations [Cigna 2018]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cigna 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)A law review article often contains 20,000 to 30,000 words.
“a law review article often contains 20,000 to 30,000 words,39”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)A brief on the merits to the Supreme Court can have as many as 15,000 words.
“a brief on the merits to the Supreme Court can have as many as 15,000 words,38”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 68 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Recent examples include using MathBERT to power 'knowledge tracing' and the 'feedback challenge'.
“Recent examples include using MathBERT [Shen et al. 2021b] to power”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shen et al. 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wu et al. 2021e
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Cui [2018] has proposed a zero-shot or few-shot adaptation process that can only be operationalized through the use of foundation models.
“Cui [2018] has proposed a zero-shot (or few-shot) adaptation process that can only be operationalized through the use of foundation models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cui [2018]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Recent work has removed linguistic cues for a suspect's race in police reports to promote race-blind charging decisions and avoid racially biased prosecutions.
“Recent work has also removed linguistic cues for a suspect's race in police reports to promote race-blind charging decisions and avoid racially biased prosecutions [Chohlas-Wood et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chohlas-Wood et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)A system for facilitative moderation in public comment forums has already been deployed in the U.S. Department of Transportation rulemaking process.
“Such a system has already been deployed in the U.S. Department of Transportation rulemaking process [Park et al. 2012]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Park et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)It has not yet been comprehensively studied whether domain-adaptive pretraining gains extend to a diverse set of legal tasks.
“It has not yet been comprehensively studied whether this extends to a diverse set of legal tasks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The average U.S. Supreme Court opinion contains around 4,700 words.
“The average U.S. Supreme Court opinion contains around 4,700 words,37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe gap between the demand for education and our ability to provide it is alarmingly large and has concerning achievement disparities across protected demographics.
“Considering the rising need to provide adult retraining, the gap between the demand for education and our ability to provide it is alarmingly large and has concerning achievement disparities across protected demographics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Machine translation software has already been deemed unreliable for use as evidence in some courts, although it continues to be relied upon in others.
“For this reason machine translation software has already been deemed unreliable for use as evidence in some courts,42 although it continues to be relied upon in others.43”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [42]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 68 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Visual Studio has recently released GitHub CoPilot, an AI pair-programmer built upon GPT-3.
“Visual Studio has recently released GitHub CoPilot, an AI pair-programmer built upon GPT-3 [Chen et al. 2021f].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al. 2021f
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Only a fraction of cases end up in legal opinions, so it is unclear whether the disputes in publicly available data are representative of the typical disputes presented to a model in practice.
“Since only a fraction of cases end up in legal opinions, it is unclear whether the disputes in publicly available data are representative of the typical disputes presented to a model in practice [Priest and Klein 1984].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Priest and Klein 1984
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Other work has helped identify disrespectful police communications.
“Other work has helped identify disrespectful police communications [Voigt et al. 2017].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Voigt et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 66 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)These efforts have demonstrated that larger language models that are pretrained on more data achieve performance gains on certain challenging tasks, compared to more limited gains observed in other settings.
“These efforts have demonstrated that larger language models that are pretrained on more data achieve performance gains on certain challenging tasks, compared to more limited gains observed in other settings [Chalkidis et al. 2020; Elwany et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chalkidis et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Elwany et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhong et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 62 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Legal documents tend to be far longer than documents in any other context.
“Legal documents tend to be far longer than documents in any other context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 64 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Emerging research has studied ways of using foundation models to measure, detect, and generate persuasive texts.
“Emerging research has studied ways of using foundation models to measure, detect, and generate persuasive texts [Duerr and Gloor 2021; Li et al. 2020a; Longpre et al. 2019]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Duerr and Gloor 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li et al. 2020a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Longpre et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Many tasks in education require understanding the learners.
“Many of those tasks require us to first understand the learners whom we are trying to help, especially in the context of open ended work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisereasoning§ 68 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Building technical solutions to effectively scale inclusively and quality of education has proven to be exceptionally difficult.
“Despite this potential, building technical solutions to effectively scale inclusively and quality of education has proven to be exceptionally difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDALL-E shows signs of visual creativity, generating from scratch strikingly-realistic pictures of avocado chairs.
“and DALL-E shows signs of visual creativity, generating from scratch strikingly-realistic pictures of avocado chairs [Ramesh et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramesh et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGPT-3 composes rich and fluent tales about unicorns.
“while GPT-3 composes rich and fluent tales about unicorns [Brown et al. 2020]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisecitation§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Teachers are ideally trained to speak to students with respect and in a way that intentionally helps them form a positive identity with the subject being learned.
“Teachers are ideally trained to speak to students with respect and in a way that intentionally helps them form a positive identity with the subject being learned [Truax 2018].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Truax 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe self-attention mechanism enables shorter computation paths and provides direct means to compare elements far across the input data.
“They build on the self-attentionmechanism [Vaswani et al. 2017; Bahdanau et al. 2014] that enables shorter computation paths and provides direct means to compare elements far-across the input data (such as a pronoun and its antecedent in a sentence, or two sentences that refer to the same topic).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Vaswani et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bahdanau et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Interpretationreasoning§ 76 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The general-purpose nature of attention and transformers contributes to their broad applicability for a wide range of research problems and applications.
“We hypothesize that the general-purpose nature of attention and transformers contributes to their broad applicability for a wide range of research problems and applications [Liu et al. 2019; Dosovitskiy et al. 2020; Hudson and Zitnick 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dosovitskiy et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hudson and Zitnick 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent inductive biases, as implemented in RNNs or CNNs, can improve learning efficiency and enhance the capacity of a network to model different forms of information: sequential data for RNNs, or spatially-invariant information for CNNs.
“while different inductive biases, as those implemented in Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) or Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) [Goodfellow et al. 2016], can improve the learning efficiency and enhance the capacity of a given network to model different forms of information: sequential data, common to language, speech and time-series, for the former, or spatially-invariant information, as in”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goodfellow et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 72 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Remarkably complex language can be acquired by babies in a short amount of time.
“§2.1: language of this paper highlights the fact that remarkably complex language can be acquired by babies in a short amount of time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites §2.1
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 76 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)There is a general trade-off between task-specialization and expressivity: models with stronger structural priors can leverage them to improve sample efficiency on particular tasks, while models with weaker inductive biases learn more slowly but can scale to higher volumes of data and adapt to diverse domains.
“This contrast captures a more general trade-off between task-specialization and expressivity: models with stronger structural priors can leverage them to improve sample efficiency on the particular tasks that benefit from these assumptions; while conversely, models that integrate weaker inductive biases learn more slowly, but can in turn scale to higher volumes of data and adapt to a diverse set”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBERT shines at a wide spectrum of language understanding tasks: from textual classification and entailment to question answering and reading comprehension.
“as models such as BERT [Devlin et al. 2019] shine at a wide spectrum of language understanding tasks: from textual classification and entailment to question answering and reading comprehension”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)It is less clear how to build a model that can diagnose mistakes in student understanding based on the student's answers.
“It is easy to imagine a foundation model which has been adapted to answer a math question correctly, but it is less clear how to build a model that can diagnose mistakes in student understanding based on the student's answers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisereasoning§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Reasoning about student understanding is an essential step towards providing inclusive, high quality instruction.
“Reasoning about student understanding is an essential step towards a second objective: provide inclusive, high quality instruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 76 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Leading approaches keep struggling with modeling extremely long-range dependencies, which may be attributed to the quadratic computation of contemporary transformer-based approaches.
“Leading approaches [Choromanski et al. 2020; Dosovitskiy et al. 2020] keep struggling with modeling of extremely long-range dependencies, such as those occurring in books, movies, or even DNA sequences, which may be attributed to the quadratic computation of contemporary transformer-based approaches [Wang et al. 2020c; Lin et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Choromanski et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dosovitskiy et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al. 2020c
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe emerging paradigm of foundation models has attained impressive achievements in AI over the last few years.
“The emerging paradigm of foundation models has attained impressive achievements in AI over the last few years, as models such as BERT [Devlin et al. 2019] shine at a wide spectrum of language understanding tasks: from textual classification and entailment to question answering and reading comprehension, while GPT-3 composes rich and fluent tales about unicorns [Brown et al. 2020] and DALL-E shows”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brown et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ramesh et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior works have proposed formal expressivity measures to characterize the complexity of functions a network can compute, which is affected by its depth, width, connectivity, and structural patterns.
“Prior works have proposed formal expressivity measures to characterize the complexity of functions a network can compute, or more precisely, approximate, which is essentially affected by its depth, width, connectivity, and structural patterns [Raghu et al. 2017].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raghu et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent foundation models manifest noteworthy behaviors of interpretability, robustness, controllability and generalization.
“but also manifest noteworthy behaviors of interpretability [Karras et al. 2020], robustness [Devlin et al. 2019], controllability [Patashnik et al. 2021] and generalization [Brown et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Karras et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Patashnik et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe universal approximation theorem states that even simple multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) can represent a broad set of functions.
“The universal approximation theorem [Lu et al. 2019b] indeed states that even simple multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) can represent a broad set of functions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lu et al. 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFive properties-expressivity, scalability, multimodality, memory capacity, and compositionality-are essential for a foundation model to distill and accumulate knowledge, organize it, and flexibly generalize it.
“Here, we identify and discuss five such properties, spanning expressivity, scalability,multimodality, memory capacity, and compositionality, that we believe are essential for a foundation model in order to: (1) distill and accumulate knowledge from various sources and domains, (2) organize it in an effective and scalable representation, and (3) flexibly generalize it towards novel contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransformer networks demonstrate the importance of capturing long-range dependencies and pairwise or higher-order interactions between elements.
“Meanwhile, transformer networks [Vaswani et al. 2017], introduced more recently, demonstrate the importance of capturing long-range dependencies and pairwise or higher-order interactions between elements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vaswani et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAttention-based models can adapt their computation to the input, as in prepositional phrase attachment, unlike feed-forward networks that process input in the same manner.
“This proves especially useful for language modeling, where, for instance, given a sentence like”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zavrel et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Effective teaching requires reasoning about student understanding.
“Since effective teaching requires reasoning about student understanding, the previous discussions on understanding subject matter and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Public data sources like textbooks, lecture videos, lesson plans, and graded feedback collectively contain important pedagogical behaviours which could be adapted by foundation models.
“There are also public data sources like textbooks, lecture videos, lesson plans, and graded feedback that collectively contain important pedagogical behaviours which could be adapted by foundation models (Figure 15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The ability for an instructor to 'notice' the reasons behind why a student makes a specific mistake is a critical component of the feedback challenge.
“The ability for an instructor to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 70 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Computational approaches to instruction focus on tasks like content personalization, question generation, adaptive curriculum design, and predicting instructor intervention.
“Computational approaches to instruction focus on different tasks like content personalization [Connor 2019], question generation [Guo et al. 2016; Willis et al. 2019; Srivastava and Goodman 2021], adaptive curriculum design [Mandel et al. 2014; Doroudi et al. 2017], and predicting instructor intervention [Chandrasekaran and Kan 2019; Alrajhi et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Connor 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guo et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Willis et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDomain completeness-solving the training task requires capabilities broadly useful for downstream tasks in the domain-is crucial for the generality of a foundation model.
“An important goal for foundation model training algorithms is to be domain complete, in the sense that solving the training task requires capabilities that are broadly useful for downstream tasks in the domain (see §2.1: language, §2.2: vision, §2.3: robotics). This property is crucial for the generality of a foundation model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Current self-supervised learning methods produce prediction problems from unlabeled data without the need for human annotators.
“Current self-supervised learning (SSL) methods for training foundation models are diverse, but what unites them is that they produce prediction problems from unlabeled data without the need for human annotators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 76 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Much of the transformers' great success over the previously dominating recurrent approach was driven by their higher degree of parallelism.
“Indeed, much of the transformers' great success over the previously dominating recurrent approach was driven by their higher degree of parallelism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Not only can the model or its computation be compositional, but the data or training processes can be compositional too.
“Not only can the model or its computation be compositional, but so can be the data or training processes too [Andreas 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Andreas 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Such structured representations could support multi-hop reasoning and inference, and potentially enable stronger out-of-distribution generalization through recombination.
“Such representations could support multi-hop reasoning and inference [Washington et al. 1995; Sun et al. 2020b; Yu et al. 2020c], and potentially also enable stronger out-of-distribution generalization through recombination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Washington et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sun et al. 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yu et al. 2020c
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Transformers exhibit operations that involve key-value memory-access and computation among the contextual word representations they gradually build.
“Transformers, the celebrated architecture underlying most foundation models to date, likewise exhibits operations that involve key-value memory-access and computation among the contextual word representations they gradually build [Geva et al. 2020].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geva et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLanguage modeling may require models to acquire capabilities as wide-ranging as coreference, sentiment and translation as the model learns to predict the next word in a document.
“For example, language modeling may require models to acquire capabilities as wide-ranging as coreference, sentiment and translation as the model learns to predict the next word in a document.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Some methods rely on concatenation of hand-engineered modules, while alternative approaches enable network specialization to naturally emerge through learning.
“While some methods rely on concatenation of hand-engineered modules [Andreas et al. 2016], alternative approaches enable the network specialization to naturally emerge through learning [Shazeer et al. 2017].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Andreas et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shazeer et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Compositionality may hold the key to achieve out-of-distribution or combinatorial generalization.
“Compositionality may hold the key to achieve out-of-distribution — or specifically — combinatorial generalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)SSL objectives manufacture a rich training signal from data through carefully-designed constraints, either on the data itself or on the way the model is able to represent or process the data.
“SSL objectives manufacture a rich training signal from this data through carefully-designed constraints, either on the data itself (e.g., redacting or noising) or on the way the model is able to represent or process the data (e.g., latent bottlenecks).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Compositionality can also hinder the expressivity of the representation, and impede its capacity to account for idiosyncrasies, exceptions, and contextual correlations.
“However, compositionality can also hinder the expressivity of the representation, and impede its capacity to account for idiosyncrasies, exceptions, and contextual correlations [Misra et al. 2017a].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Misra et al. 2017a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Decoupling explicit and implicit knowledge is key for memory update, manipulation or adaptation, which could in turn enable generalization to novel contexts and downstream tasks.
“and most notably, is key for memory update, manipulation or adaptation [Lewis et al. 2020b] (§4.3: adaptation), which could in turn enable generalization to novel contexts and downstream tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al. 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Generality is critical for improving AI capabilities, as corroborated by recent success of general-purpose models like transformers across different modalities.
“And so, as corroborated by recent success of general-purpose models like transformers across different modalities — both linguistic [Liu et al. 2019; Lan et al. 2019] and visual [Dosovitskiy et al. 2020; Hudson and Zitnick 2021], we see that generality is critical for improving AI capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lan et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dosovitskiy et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe efficiency of training objectives can vary tremendously, for example 4x for ELECTRA vs BERT, and 12x for contrastive vs generative approaches to CLIP training.
“47e.g., 4x for ELECTRA [Clark et al. 2020] vs BERT [Devlin et al. 2019], 12x for contrastive vs generative approaches to CLIP training [Radford et al. 2021]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Clark et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Devlin et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Splitting a dataset into subsets, training different models on each independently, and recombining them at test time through ensemble techniques is a compositional training approach.
“Instead of training one model over a complete dataset, one could split, or decompose it into subsets, train different models on each one independently, and ultimately recombine them at test time through various ensemble techniques [Dietterich 2000].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dietterich 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)While there is consensus about the importance of multimodality, models that go beyond shallow alignment of vision and language are yet to exist, and grounded language learning in embodied environments still has much room for exploration.
“Overall, while there seems to be a consensus within the community about the importance of multimodality, models that go beyond shallow alignment of vision and language are yet to exist, and the theme of grounded language learning in embodied environments still has much room for exploration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Models such as MAC and Dynamic Memory Networks perform explicit iterative computation, decomposing a task into multiple reasoning steps, manifesting sequential progression from initial facts to novel inferences and conclusions.
“Other models, such as MAC [Hudson and Manning 2018] and Dynamic Memory Networks [Xiong et al. 2016] perform an explicit iterative computation, where a given task is decomposed into multiple reasoning steps, performed one by one, manifesting sequential progression from a set of initial facts to novel inferences and conclusions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hudson and Manning 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xiong et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe rise of self-supervised learning algorithms has unlocked the power of internet-scale datasets which would be intractable to annotate by hand.
“The rise of self-supervised learning algorithms has unlocked the power of internet-scale datasets which would be intractable to annotate by hand.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 80 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Many approaches that have dominated over the last decade tend to focus mostly on one end of the spectrum, and learn monolithic distributed representations.
“But while many approaches that have dominated over the last decade tend to focus mostly on one end of the spectrum, and learn monolithic distributed representations, we believe that exploring manners to reach a better balance between contextuality and compositionality is a promising avenue for future research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 78 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Using key-value structures for accessing external memories has been shown to be very effective for modeling long-term dependencies.
“using key-value structures [Miller et al. 2016] for accessing external memories has been shown to be very effective for modeling long-term dependencies [Henaff et al. 2016; Bosselut et al. 2018; Lample et al. 2019].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Henaff et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bosselut et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lample et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)This domain-specificity makes it challenging to grasp the common threads and scientific principles underlying why each of these methods work, and requires developing new foundation model training methods from scratch for each new field.
“This has two major disadvantages: First, these different techniques make it challenging to grasp the common threads and scientific principles underlying why each of these methods work. Second, this domain-specificity requires developing new foundation model training methods from scratch for each new field, including medical, scientific, and new multimodal settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)GPU memory is typically a more limiting resource than disk storage.
“Because GPU memory is typically a more limiting resource than disk storage, low-memory adaptation procedures are perhaps even more critical to democratizing foundation models than low-storage adaptation procedures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Separately fine-tuning a foundation model for many tasks can incur unacceptable storage costs.
“Also, separately fine-tuning for many tasks can incur unacceptable storage costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Low-memory adaptation procedures are perhaps even more critical to democratizing foundation models than low-storage adaptation procedures.
“Because GPU memory is typically a more limiting resource than disk storage, low-memory adaptation procedures are perhaps even more critical to democratizing foundation models than low-storage adaptation procedures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Data and training algorithms need not be viewed as independent factors.
“We also need not view data (§4.6: data) and training algorithms as independent factors: not only does the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Most discriminative methods output vectors for (parts of) inputs, which are trained to be similar for different 'views' of an input or used to predict whether parts of inputs are real or fake.
“Most of these methods output vectors for (parts of) inputs, which are trained to be similar for different”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Wu et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van den Oord et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chen et al. 2020c
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Multimodal foundation models remain a nascent research area; much is still unexplored about the different ways a model can be multimodal as well as better understanding the capabilities these additional modalities bring.
“Multimodal foundation models remain a nascent research area; much is still unexplored about the different ways a model can be multimodal as well as better understanding the capabilities these additional modalities bring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningFine-tuning the parameters of a foundation model with an organization's internal, domain-specific data could improve the model's accuracy by adding information relevant to the organization's use case.
“Alternatively, fine-tuning the parameters of a foundation model with an organization's internal, domain-specific data could improve the model's accuracy by adding information relevant to the organization's use case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)CLIP encodes images and text separately into vectors, enabling users who have examples from a single modality to retrieve, score, or classify examples from the other modality.
“The former encodes images and text separately into vectors, enabling users who have examples from a single modality to retrieve, score, or classify examples from the other modality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Low-storage adaptation methods typically freeze most of the pretrained foundation model parameters and learn only a relatively small number of task-specific parameters, reducing the storage overhead for each task.
“Typically, methods in this class freeze most of the pretrained foundation model parameters and only learn a relatively small number of task-specific parameters (either by fine-tuning some pretrained parameters or by adding altogether newmodules), reducing the storage overhead for each task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)ViLBERT processes images and text jointly at an early stage of the model, enabling downstream applications like visual question answering where reasoning over pairs of related images and text are provided.
“The second processes images and text jointly at an early stage of the model, enabling downstream applications like visual question answering where reasoning over pairs of related images and text (e.g., images and questions about them) are provided.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lu et al. 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)The key design decision for low-storage adaptation algorithms is the choice of parameters to be adapted.
“The key design decision for such algorithms is the choice of parameters to be adapted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Discriminative training approaches do not enable generation-based interaction, yet they may enable more efficient learning for classification- or regression-based tasks in high-dimensional continuous settings like images, audio, and video.
“While generative training approaches have their benefits, several discriminative approaches have also recently gained traction. These methods do not enable generation-based interaction, yet they may enable more efficient learning for classification- or regression-based tasks in high-dimensional continuous settings like images, audio, and video.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Using domain knowledge to reduce the input space of a model (e.g., patch embeddings, tokenization) may alleviate some challenges facing generative approaches, but has the trade-off that it may jettison possibly-useful information in the input.
“Another option is to use domain knowledge to reduce the input space of a model — such strategies include patch embeddings [Dosovitskiy et al. 2020] as well as fixed or learned tokenization [Schuster and Nakajima 2012; Sennrich et al. 2016; Kudo and Richardson 2018; van den Oord et al. 2017; Ramesh et al. 2021]. These methods may alleviate some challenges facing generative approaches, but have the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dosovitskiy et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schuster and Nakajima 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sennrich et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)CLIP and ViLBERT are both multimodal vision-language models but differ in the precise way they are multimodal.
“For example, CLIP [Radford et al. 2021] and ViLBERT [Lu et al. 2019a] are both multimodal vision-language, but differ in the precise way they are multimodal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Radford et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lu et al. 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 86 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Lightweight adaptation techniques sometimes achieve performance comparable to full fine-tuning despite updating 1000× fewer parameters, though they seem to trade off parameter efficiency and performance on downstream tasks.
“While these lightweight adaptation techniques seem to trade off parameter efficiency and performance on downstream tasks, they sometimes achieve comparable performance to full fine-tuning, despite updating 1000× fewer parameters [Zaken et al. 2021; Li and Liang 2021; Hu et al. 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Zaken et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li and Liang 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hu et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 82 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM)Not all training objectives are made equal - some are radically more efficient than others, translating into far more capable foundation models for a given compute budget.
“It is clear that not all training objectives are made equal — some are radically more efficient than others, translating into far more capable foundation models for a given compute budget.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThree factors are of particular importance for practitioners to consider when selecting an adaptation procedure: the compute budget (storage and memory), the amount of task-specific data available, and the extent of access to foundation model gradients.
“We emphasize three factors of particular importance for practitioners to consider when selecting an adaptation procedure: (1) the compute budget (specifically storage and memory); (2) the amount of task-specific data available; and (3) extent of access to foundation model gradients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Foundation models will be widely deployed in the near future.
“Despite the impending widespread deployment of foundation models”
The paper relies on this without support.
Government investment in public infrastructure can close the resource gap for foundation models.
“One way to close the resource gap is for the government to invest in public infrastructure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Volunteer computing can be harnessed for training foundation models.
“Recently, the Learning@home project is attempting to harness volunteer computing for training foundation models [Ryabinin and Gusev 2020].”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Shared structures and patterns between languages can lead to sharing and transfer from high-resource languages to low-resource languages.
“Joint multilingual training relies on the reasonable assumption that the shared structures and patterns between languages can lead to sharing and transfer from the high-resource languages to the low-resource ones”
The paper relies on this without support.
BLEU does not correlate with causal judgements from humans.
“parallel ones in natural language processing (e.g., metrics like BLEU do not correlate with causal judgements from humans).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Due to high costs, labeled training data is scarce in legal applications.
“At the same time, due to its high costs, labeled training data is scarce.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The majority of legal tasks in which reliance on foundation models will be beneficial involve text-based inputs and outputs.
“Yet, the majority of legal tasks in which reliance on foundation models will be beneficial involve text-based inputs and outputs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The process of biomedical discovery involves extrapolation.
“The process of biomedical discovery involves extrapolation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Foundation models have a strong generative capability, such as coherent text generation in GPT-3.
“First, foundation models have a strong generative capability (e.g., coherent text generation in GPT-3), which can help generative tasks in biomedical research”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is very costly to label data in criminal justice contexts because annotators must be given access to sensitive data and appropriate background checks are often required.
“In these contexts, it is very costly to label data since annotators must be given access to sensitive data and appropriate background checks are often required.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cost of annotating legal data is very high.
“First, the cost of annotating data is very high.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Certain legal data may be sensitive and cannot be pooled together to train a large language model.
“Even after labels are obtained, certain data may be sensitive and cannot be pooled together to training a large language model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Legal decision-making requires context at various scales: knowledge of all historical decisions and standards, knowledge of case law that remains relevant, and knowledge of nuances of individual case.
“Second, legal decision-making requires context at various scales: knowledge of all historical decisions and standards, knowledge of the case law that remains relevant in the present, and knowledge of the nuances of the individual case at hand.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Specificity and truthfulness are of heightened importance in legal contexts, where imprecise statements can have drastic, unanticipated consequences, and false statements can lead to sanctions against attorneys.
“Specificity and truthfulness are of heightened important in legal contexts, where imprecise statements can have drastic, unanticipated consequences, and false statements can lead to sanctions against attorneys.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Costly training data for more representative scenarios may be concentrated in the biggest law firms.
“Costly training data for more representative scenarios may be concentrated in the biggest law firms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These law firms may have the ability to retain and accumulate data across many cases and clients.
“These law firms may have the ability to retain and accumulate data across many cases and clients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing work has focused on custom solutions to highly specific tasks for which large amounts of training data has to be collected from scratch.
“One particular challenge is that existing work has focused on custom solutions to highly specific tasks for which large amounts of training data has to be collected from scratch.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These systems may experience a high degree of 'feedback', where the collected data continually reinforces the model's decisions.
“Moreover, these systems may experience a high degree of”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the United States, student information is protected by FERPA.
“For example, in the United States, student information is protected by the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).”
The paper relies on this without support.
These laws and regulations are especially important for children under 13, who have their data privacy and security additionally protected by COPPA.
“These laws and regulations are especially important for children under 13, who have their data privacy and security additionally protected by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.”
The paper relies on this without support.
FERPA limits teachers from sharing personally identifiable student work.
“Among other things, FERPA limits teachers from sharing personally identifiable student work.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Across classrooms, and across learning tasks in a given domain, there are generalizable patterns in how students arrive at their answers.
“Across classrooms, and across learning tasks in a given domain, there are generalizable patterns in how students arrive at their answers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The language used by teachers is often different from the language used by the general population.
“The language used by teachers is often different from the language used by the general population.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microsoft's 2016 Twitter bot 'Tay' started generating hate speech within 24 hours of being deployed live.
“Cautionary examples like Microsoft's 2016 Twitter bot”
The paper relies on this without support.
Humans seem to learn well when presented with real-world analogies and contrasts which may be cross-cutting between their current context and past experiences.
“Humans seem to learn well when presented with real-world analogies and contrasts which may be cross-cutting between their current context and past experiences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Multimodality is a key component of intelligence and a crucial factor for thorough and broad comprehension of the world.
“Essentially, multimodality serves as a key component of intelligence, and is a crucial factor for the development of both thorough and broad comprehension of the world.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Language learning is more effective when occurring in a grounded environment rather than in a vacuum.
“Concretely, language learning is more effective when occurring in a grounded environment rather than in a vacuum.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Language encourages the emergence of abstractions that link low-level perceptual signals and statistics to semantic concepts of objects, properties, agents and motivations, thereby enriching and elevating visual representations.
“And inversely, from the vision perspective, language encourages the emergence of abstractions that link between low-level perceptual signals and statistics to semantic concepts of objects, properties, agents and motivations, thereby enriching and elevating visual representations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The whole can sometimes be greater than the sum of its parts (e.g., red wine is not the same as red onion).
“In other words, the whole can sometimes be greater than the sum of its parts, where for instance, red wine is not the same as red onion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Facts' correctness and validity can change over time as the world keeps evolving.
“it is crucial to note the dynamic nature of knowledge, where facts' correctness and validity can change over time as the world keeps evolving — and what was true or relevant yesterday may not be so tomorrow.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent AI advances allow large language models to perform non-routine tasks such as software coding, persuasive writing, and graphic design.
“recent advances in AI, particularly those driven by generative AI, suggest that it is possible for LLMs to perform a variety of non-routine tasks such as software coding, persuasive writing, and graphic design (Bommasani et al., 2021;Eloundou et al., 2023).”
From Generative AI at Work (2023) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
In §2.5 (p. 46), the paper describes foundation-model tools for writers, text-to-image generation for digital artists, and code completion for programmers. It also discusses generating persuasive texts (p. 64). These passages support the range of tasks, but the paper attributes visual creation to foundation models broadly, not specifically to large language models, and does not establish graphic design as an LLM capability. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA significant technological divide emerges where only well-funded institutions can access LLM technology and advance research, creating economic and research inequalities, especially for researchers from developing countries.
“As a result, a significant technological divide emerges where only well-funded institutions can have access to this technology and advance LLM research, creating economic and research inequalities, specifically for researchers from developing countries (Bommasani et al. 2021 ).”
From A review of LLMs and their applications in the architecture, engineering and construction industry (2025) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al. 2021
The discussion on p. 10 says industry can train larger foundation models than academia and that rising barriers to development may widen the resource gap, supporting the concern about unequal ability to advance research. It does not say that only well-funded institutions can access the technology, or specifically identify researchers in developing countries as affected. The paper frames the gap as a risk likely to persist or grow, rather than an established outcome. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLarge language models often express unintended behaviors such as making up facts, generating biased or toxic text, or simply not following user instructions.
“However, these models often express unintended behaviors such as making up facts, generating biased or toxic text, or simply not following user instructions (Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021; Kenton et al., 2021; Weidinger et al., 2021; Tamkin et al., 2021; Gehman et al., 2020).”
From Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback (2022) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
The Law discussion (p. 64) says current foundation models can create fake facts, and §5.1 (p. 18) discusses biases that may cause harm. Those passages support the factuality and bias concerns, but the passages found do not establish that models often generate toxic text or fail to follow user instructions. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn mainstream AI, perception is decoupled from structured sensorimotor contingencies that characterize embodied agents, and instead reduced to pattern recognition over static datasets.
“In this setting, perception is decoupled from the kinds of structured sensorimotor contingencies that characterize embodied agents, and instead reduced to pattern recognition over static datasets (Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021).”
From Toward Enactive Artificial Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
The Vision discussion (p. 32) says current vision foundation models largely use image-and-text datasets and calls for settings beyond static datasets that account for embodied, interactive perception. The robotics discussion (p. 36) likewise contrasts offline vision datasets with robots learning through sensor-guided action. These passages support the contrast, but not the broader assertion that mainstream AI perception is decoupled from sensorimotor contingencies or reduced to pattern recognition. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLLMs are trained on massive-scale text corpora with an objective of next-token prediction that learns statistical regularities in language, as opposed to any grounded understanding of the world or reality.
“These models are trained on massive-scale text corpora, with an objective of next-token prediction that learns statistical regularities in language, as opposed to any grounded understanding of the world or reality (Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021).”
From "Just Asking Questions": Doing Our Own Research on Conspiratorial Ideation by Generative AI Chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
The discussion of language acquisition (p. 24) says GPT-3 is trained on enormous amounts of language data and that most NLP foundation models learn distributional information from raw, ungrounded text. The introduction (p. 5) describes next-word prediction as an autoregressive objective, but the training discussion (pp. 17, 82) also describes other objectives, so it is not an objective of all such models. The philosophy-of-understanding discussion (p. 53) treats whether foundation models can understand language as an open question rather than establishing that they have no understanding of reality. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Safety guardrails are typically set in place in line with developers' judgments about what constitutes risk or harm, such as hate speech, toxicity, or election interference.
“Crucially, safety guardrails are typically set in place in line with developers ' judgments about what constitutes risk or harm, such as hate speech, toxicity, or election interference (Bommasani et al., 2021; Weidinger et al., 2022).”
From "Just Asking Questions": Doing Our Own Research on Conspiratorial Ideation by Generative AI Chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
The Safety & robustness discussion (p. 38) says safety constraints must be specified before data collection, supporting the general idea of guardrails set in advance. But it concerns robotics, not a typical practice of setting guardrails according to developers’ judgments about hate speech, toxicity, or election interference. The Interaction discussion (p. 46) instead describes content filters based on rules agreed by an online community. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDesigning effective prompting strategies requires identifying contexts in which LLM errors arise, devising prompting strategies to overcome them, and systematically assessing those strategies' effectiveness.
“While prompting LLMs can appear efortless, designing efective prompting strategies requires identifying the contexts in which these LLMs' errors arise, devising prompting strategies to overcome them, and systematically assessing those strategies' efectiveness.”
From Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
On p. 52, the paper says GPT-3 can produce coherent output or nonsense depending on the prompt, and that prompt engineering requires deep expertise. Section 2.5 (p. 44) recommends prompt engineering to make model behavior more predictable and robust. These passages support the difficulty and purpose of designing prompts, but do not set out the claimed process of identifying error contexts and systematically assessing each strategy’s effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredUsing pre-trained LLMs substantially lowers the data and programming-skill barriers to creating passable conversational user experiences.
“substantially lowering the data and programming-skill barriers to creating passable conversational user experiences [7].”
From Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Section 2.5, Interaction (p. 44), says language-based foundation models could significantly lower the application-development threshold by reducing the need to collect data or train models from scratch, allowing even non-ML experts to prototype applications. It does not establish that these applications are specifically conversational or that they produce passable conversational user experiences; it also frames the reduction as a possibility rather than an established result. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWith the availability of generative conversational AI, a broader range of uses and practices of conversational technology is expected.
“With the availability of generative conversational AI, including ChatGPT (Open AI), Bard (Google), and Claude (Anthropic), a broader range of uses and practices of conversational technology is expected (Bommasani, et al. , 2021).”
From Why do people use ChatGPT? Exploring user motivations for generative conversational AI (2024) · cites this paper as Bommasani, et al., 2021
Section 2.5 (p. 15) predicts that foundation models’ generative capabilities will enable novel, more dynamic forms of user interaction, and §2.5 (p. 44) anticipates a greater diversity of interactions. This supports the broad expectation, but the passages do not specifically address a wider range of conversational-technology practices or the named products. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLLMs are ideal for tackling the aforementioned challenges due to their remarkable generative ability in language tasks.
“Thanks to LLMs' remarkable generative ability in language tasks, they are ideal for tackling the aforementioned challenges [152].”
From When large language models meet personalization: perspectives of challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [152]
Section 2.1 (p. 22) describes highly coherent language generation and says generative models have become a primary tool in NLP. Section 2.5 (p. 44) says their generative capabilities could help address challenges, but qualifies this by saying success depends on how effectively the models can be used. That supports their potential, not the unqualified assertion that LLMs are ideal for the unspecified challenges. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLLMs have the potential to reshape the landscape of cyber-social security dramatically.
“Therefore, LLMs have the potential to reshape the landscape of cyber-social security dramatically, a concern shared by many researchers (Bommasani et al., 2021;Yamin et al., 2021;Guembe et al., 2022;Goldstein et al., 2023;Kucharavy et al., 2023).”
From Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet (2024) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
Section 5.2 (p. 18) warns that foundation models can generate disinformation and deepfakes that cause societal harm, supporting the claim’s concern about social risks. The Applications section also says these models could transform sectors of society. Our copy does not specifically establish a dramatic reshaping of the broader cyber-social security landscape. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe foundation-model paradigm concentrated capability into a small number of large artifacts whose governance is determined by a single developer choice, the release modality.
“The foundation-model paradigm named by Bommasani et al. (2021) concentrated capability into a small number of large artifacts whose governance is determined by a single developer choice, the release modality, which ranges along a spectrum from a fully closed inference interface to fully open weights and beyond.”
From Commons-Governed Artificial Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Collective Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
The Naming discussion (p. 6) identifies the foundation-model paradigm, and Fig. 2 (p. 6) describes one model serving many downstream tasks. But the ecosystem discussion (p. 8) says impacts depend on decisions at multiple stages, potentially made by different organizations. It does not support governance being determined by the single choice of release modality or the stated closed-to-open spectrum. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFoundation models are trained on massive, diverse datasets and can be applied to numerous downstream tasks.
“Foundation models-the latest generation of AI models-are trained on massive, diverse datasets and can be applied to numerous downstream tasks 1 .”
From Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
Large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user.
“For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user.”
From Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback (2022) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
AI-generated texts of news and non-news were different in linguistic styles and how they exhibit (or pretend) credibility.
“our work underscores the challenges of wide adoption of LLMs in diferent contexts [11], and shows that AI-generated texts of news and non-news were diferent in linguistic styles and how they exhibit (or pretend) credibility.”
From Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human Solutions (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
Previous works on pretraining slide foundation models are predominantly pretrained using vision-only modeling, which neglects rich supervisory signals found in pathology reports and precludes multimodal capabilities such as zero-shot visual-language understanding and cross-model retrieval.
“First, these models are predominantly pretrained using vision-only modeling57,59,60, which neglects not only rich supervisory signals found in pathology reports but also precludes multimodal capabilities such as zero-shot visual-language understanding and cross-model retrieval—a fundamental hallmark in foundation models84,85.”
From A multimodal whole-slide foundation model for pathology (2025) · cites this paper as [84]
Foundation models function as infrastructure for building downstream applications across market sectors.
“Foundation models function as infrastructure for building downstream applications, spanning market sectors (Bommasani et al., 2021;2023c;Vipra & Korinek, 2023; UK CMA, 2023).”
From On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models (2024) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
LLMs are a form of generative AI and power the chatbots of interest in this study; they are often referred to as foundation models.
“LLMs are a form of generative AI, and power the chatbots of interest in this study; they are often referred to as 'foundation models' (Bommasani et al., 2021).”
From "Just Asking Questions": Doing Our Own Research on Conspiratorial Ideation by Generative AI Chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
The current paradigm driving the state of the art in AI is the 'foundation model': large-scale ML models pre-trained on broad data, which can be repurposed for a wide range of downstream applications.
“The current paradigm driving the state of the art in AI is the 'foundation model' (Bommasani et al., 2021): large-scale ML models pre-trained on broad data, which can be repurposed for a wide range of downstream applications.”
From Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI (2025) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
Researchers have warned about the potential misuse of LLMs to generate mis/disinformation and harmful content.
“researchers have warned about the potential misuse of such technologies to generate mis/disinformation and harmful content (Bommasani et al., 2021;Yamin et al., 2021;Guembe et al., 2022;Goldstein et al., 2023).”
From Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet (2024) · cites this paper as Bommasani et al., 2021
The second wave was driven by attention mechanisms and sequence-to-sequence models, culminating in foundation models and large language models.
“The second wave was driven by the emergence of attention mechanisms and sequence-to-sequence models [6], culminating in foundation models and large language models [7].”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
The rules are currently unclear for machine learning systems trained on copyright-protected material.
“Currently, the rules are unclear for machine learning-based systems trained on copyright-protected material [9].”
From Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: Evaluation by Industry Professionals (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The Data overview (p. 18) mentions legal regulation of training data, but does not say that copyright rules for training machine-learning systems are unclear. Searches for copyright, intellectual property, fair use, and copyrighted training data found no passage addressing that point in our copy; the copy is also marked as truncated. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe study used reflexive thematic analysis to analyze the data.
“To analyze the data we used reflexive thematic analysis [15, 17] which aims to understand pattern and meaning present in qualitative data.”
From “It’s Weird That it Knows What I Want”: Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
The passages on philosophy of understanding (pp. 48–52) and data (p. 18) discuss foundation models, not reflexive thematic analysis of qualitative data. Searches for “reflexive thematic analysis” and “qualitative data pattern and meaning thematic analysis” found no passage addressing the method; our copy is truncated. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFoundation models generate data representations, called embeddings, that can generalize well to diverse predictive tasks.
“Foundation models generate data representations, called embeddings, that can generalize well to diverse predictive tasks27.”
From A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Large language models have incited substantial interest across both academic and industrial domains.
“Recently, large language models (LLMs) have incited substantial interest across both academic and industrial domains [11, 219, 257].”
From A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
Foundation models usually employ self-supervised tasks to enable scalability since they can train on any dataset, not just ones with labels.
“Foundation models usually employ self-supervised tasks to enable scalability since they can train on any dataset, not just ones with labels [3].”
From Assessing the limits of zero-shot foundation models in single-cell biology (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Education is assigned the law section number
MinorThe applications overview points to §3.2 for education, but the report's section heading identifies §3.3 as education; §3.2 is law.
“education (§3.2: law)”
“3.3 Education”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Self-citationVaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · see citing works
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486 · see citing works
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 74,248 · see citing works
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333 · see citing works
Self-citationDistinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589 · see citing works
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562 · see citing works
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460 · see citing works
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · see citing works
Self-citationGlove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071 · see citing works
Self-citationRich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684 · see citing works
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473 · see citing works
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · see citing works
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,890 · see citing works
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707 · see citing works
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935 · see citing works
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067 · see citing works
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
Desa, U. (2018) · Springer Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1891/9780826190123.ap02 · Cited by 19,434 · see citing works
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 19,268 · see citing works
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515 · see citing works
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472 · see citing works
TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learningPreprint
Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.5555/3026877.3026899 · Cited by 16,369 · see citing works
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336 · see citing works
(1954) · Cited by 15,935 · see citing works
Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839 · see citing works
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612 · see citing works
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293 · see citing works
SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features
Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_32 · Cited by 14,955 · see citing works
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237 · see citing works
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204 · see citing works
(2010) · Cited by 14,134 · see citing works
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995 · see citing works
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347 · see citing works
Self-citationEndogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. (1989) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3210 · Cited by 13,312 · see citing works
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
Shorten, C., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 · Cited by 13,203 · see citing works
Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10903 · Cited by 12,107
Graph Attention NetworksPreprint
Veličković, P., Casanova, A., Liò, P., Cucurull, G., Romero, A., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.17863/cam.48429 · Cited by 12,099 · see citing works
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983 · see citing works
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 11,720 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 11,679 · see citing works
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653 · see citing works
Toward an experimental ecology of human development.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.7.513 · Cited by 10,853 · see citing works
Rudin, C. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x · Cited by 10,561 · see citing works
The graph neural network model
Scarselli, F., Gori, M., Tsoi, A. C., Hagenbuchner, M., & Monfardini, G. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2008.2005605 · Cited by 9,582 · see citing works
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510 · see citing works
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · see citing works
Lewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.703 · Cited by 8,821 · see citing works
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741 · see citing works
Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models
Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11239 · Cited by 8,712 · see citing works
Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks
Finn, C., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.03400 · Cited by 8,512 · see citing works
Self-citationEnsemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408 · see citing works
Chomsky, N. (2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001 · Cited by 8,264 · see citing works
Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks
Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., Milan, K., Quan, J., Ramalho, T., Grabska-Barwinska, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611835114 · Cited by 7,899 · see citing works
Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis
Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11681878_14 · Cited by 7,272 · see citing works
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
Lee, J., Yoon, W., Kim, S., Kim, D., Kim, S., So, C. H., & Kang, J. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682 · Cited by 7,218 · see citing works
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · see citing works
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687 · see citing works
Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN
Karras, T., Laine, S., Aittala, M., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., & Aila, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00813 · Cited by 6,332 · see citing works
Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.03748 · Cited by 6,242 · see citing works
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208 · see citing works
Self-citationComputing Machinery and Intelligence (1950)
Turing, A. M. (2004) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198250791.003.0017 · Cited by 6,120 · see citing works
Prototypical Networks for Few-shot LearningPreprint
Snell, J., Swersky, K., & Zemel, R. S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.05175 · Cited by 5,863 · see citing works
Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R. H., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D. A., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I. G., et al. (2009) · Cited by 5,838 · see citing works
Self-citationMarr, D. (1982) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 5,784 · see citing works
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 · Cited by 5,659 · see citing works
The mythos of model interpretability
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3233231 · Cited by 5,427 · see citing works
Recurrent neural network based language model
Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. (2010) · Interspeech 2010 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2010-343 · Cited by 5,390 · see citing works
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370 · see citing works
Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by BackpropagationPreprint
Ganin, Y., & Lempitsky, V. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.7495 · Cited by 5,360 · see citing works
A New Initiative on Precision Medicine
Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1500523 · Cited by 5,202 · see citing works
Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations
Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 · Cited by 5,107 · see citing works
Self-citationA unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390177 · Cited by 5,058 · see citing works
WaveNet: a generative model for raw audio
Oord, A. V. D., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03499 · Cited by 4,911 · see citing works
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 · Cited by 4,774 · see citing works
Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models
Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.41 · Cited by 4,754 · see citing works
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01108 · Cited by 4,653 · see citing works
Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection
Rosten, E., & Drummond, T. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_34 · Cited by 4,555 · see citing works
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
Jouppi, N. P., Young, C., Patil, N., Patterson, D., Agrawal, G., Bajwa, R., Bates, S., Bhatia, S., Boden, N., Borchers, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/3079856.3080246 · Cited by 4,537 · see citing works
Self-citationOn Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation
Bach, S., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Klauschen, F., Müller, K.-R., & Samek, W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130140 · Cited by 4,524 · see citing works
VQA: Visual Question Answering
Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Zitnick, C. L., & Parikh, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.279 · Cited by 4,487 · see citing works
Kudo, T., & Richardson, J. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-2012 · Cited by 4,454 · see citing works
ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations
Lan, Z., Chen, M., Goodman, S., Gimpel, K., Sharma, P., & Soricut, R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11942 · Cited by 4,308 · see citing works
Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs
Johnson, J., Douze, M., & Jegou, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2019.2921572 · Cited by 4,228 · see citing works
Jurafsky, D. S., & Martin, J. (2000) · Cited by 4,150 · see citing works
Self-citationUniversal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1031 · Cited by 4,100 · see citing works
Axiomatic attribution for deep networks
Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., & Yan, Q. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.01365 · Cited by 4,087 · see citing works
Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation
Autor, D. H. (2015) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3 · Cited by 3,917 · see citing works
Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning
Grill, J.-B., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P. H., Buchatskaya, E., Doersch, C., Pires, B. A., Guo, Z. D., Azar, M. G., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07733 · Cited by 3,846 · see citing works
The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare
Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019) · Future Healthcare Journal · doi:10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94 · Cited by 3,800 · see citing works
Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback
Schuur, E. A. G., McGuire, A. D., Schädel, C., Grosse, G., Harden, J. W., Hayes, D. J., Hugelius, G., Koven, C. D., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D. M., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14338 · Cited by 3,774 · see citing works
Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem
McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60536-8 · Cited by 3,770 · see citing works
Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis
Brock, A., Donahue, J., & Simonyan, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.11096 · Cited by 3,717 · see citing works
GQA: A New Dataset for Real-World Visual Reasoning and Compositional Question Answering
Hudson, D. A., & Manning, C. D. (2019) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00686 · Cited by 3,703 · see citing works
Self-citationEnergy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684 · see citing works
Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-parametric Instance Discrimination
Wu, Z., Xiong, Y., Yu, S. X., & Lin, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00393 · Cited by 3,664 · see citing works
Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators
Lu, L., Jin, P., Pang, G., Zhang, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00302-5 · Cited by 3,656 · see citing works
Resilient distributed datasets: a fault-tolerant abstraction for in-memory cluster computing
Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Das, T., Dave, A., Ma, J. H., McCauley, M., Franklin, M. J. M., Shenker, S. J., & Stoica, I. G. (2012) · Cited by 3,622 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x · Cited by 3,619 · see citing works
Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering
Karpukhin, V., Oguz, B., Min, S., Lewis, P., Wu, L., Edunov, S., Chen, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550 · Cited by 3,575 · see citing works
Speed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381520a0 · Cited by 3,538 · see citing works
A theory of learning from different domains
Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., Kulesza, A., Pereira, F., & Vaughan, J. W. (2010) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-009-5152-4 · Cited by 3,515 · see citing works
Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net
Springenberg, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T., & Riedmiller, M. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6806 · Cited by 3,447 · see citing works
Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset
Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., Chouard, A., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Chai, Y., Caine, B., et al. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00252 · Cited by 3,437 · see citing works
Self-citationImproved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning
Senior, A. W., Evans, R., Jumper, J., Kirkpatrick, J., Sifre, L., Green, T., Qin, C., Žídek, A., Nelson, A. W. R., Bridgland, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · Cited by 3,378 · see citing works
Rives, A., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Goyal, S., Lin, Z., Liu, J., Guo, D., Ott, M., Zitnick, C. L., Ma, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · Cited by 3,286 · see citing works
(1989) · Cited by 3,214 · see citing works
How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196 · see citing works
Transformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context
Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Le, Q., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1285 · Cited by 3,169 · see citing works
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.08608 · Cited by 3,121 · see citing works
Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review
Parisi, G. I., Kemker, R., Part, J. L., Kanan, C., & Wermter, S. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.01.012 · Cited by 3,117 · see citing works
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243 · Cited by 3,096 · see citing works
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08691 · Cited by 3,092
Model Inversion Attacks that Exploit Confidence Information and Basic Countermeasures
Fredrikson, M., Jha, S., & Ristenpart, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2810103.2813677 · Cited by 2,961 · see citing works
Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010018 · Cited by 2,922 · see citing works
Principles of early drug discovery
Hughes, J., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S., & Philpott, K. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x · Cited by 2,859 · see citing works
Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction
Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3050 · Cited by 2,817 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in healthcare
Yu, K.-H., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z · Cited by 2,817 · see citing works
Drug Discovery: A Historical Perspective
Drews, J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5460.1960 · Cited by 2,768 · see citing works
Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., & Kundaje, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.02685 · Cited by 2,761 · see citing works
Neural Discrete Representation Learning
Oord, A. V. D., Vinyals, O., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.00937 · Cited by 2,729 · see citing works
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681 · see citing works
Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change
Huang, J., Yu, H., Guan, X., Wang, G., & Guo, R. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2837 · Cited by 2,653 · see citing works
Self-citationScalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records
Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., Dai, A. M., Hajaj, N., Hardt, M., Liu, P. J., Liu, X., Marcus, J., Sun, M., et al. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1 · Cited by 2,648 · see citing works
Self-citationBDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning
Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., & Darrell, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00271 · Cited by 2,641 · see citing works
Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics
Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E. A., Maheswaranathan, N., & Ganguli, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03585 · Cited by 2,637 · see citing works
Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive LearningPreprint
Chen, X., Fan, H., Girshick, R., & He, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.04297 · Cited by 2,579 · see citing works
ActivityNet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity understanding
Heilbron, F. C., Escorcia, V., Ghanem, B., & Niebles, J. C. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298698 · Cited by 2,578 · see citing works
Self-citationBaier, A. (1986) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/292745 · Cited by 2,567 · see citing works
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550 · see citing works
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 2,523 · see citing works
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.09010 · Cited by 2,474
Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation
Li, X. L., & Liang, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.353 · Cited by 2,473 · see citing works
Self-citationGebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., III, H. D., & Crawford, K. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3458723 · Cited by 2,469 · see citing works
A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery
Stokes, J. M., Yang, K., Swanson, K., Jin, W., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Donghia, N. M., MacNair, C. R., French, S., Carfrae, L. A., Bloom-Ackermann, Z., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021 · Cited by 2,463 · see citing works
Accelerating extinction risk from climate change
Urban, M. C. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4984 · Cited by 2,436 · see citing works
Zero-shot text-to-image generation
Ramesh, A., Pavlov, M., Goh, G., Gray, S., Voss, C., Radford, A., Chen, M., & Sutskever, I. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.12092 · Cited by 2,417 · see citing works
Self-Training With Noisy Student Improves ImageNet Classification
Xie, Q., Luong, M.-T., Hovy, E., & Le, Q. V. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01070 · Cited by 2,393 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 2,334 · see citing works
LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers
Tan, H., & Bansal, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1514 · Cited by 2,319 · see citing works
Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering
Goyal, Y., Khot, T., Summers-Stay, D., Batra, D., & Parikh, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.670 · Cited by 2,287 · see citing works
Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer
Beltagy, I., Peters, M. E., & Cohan, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05150 · Cited by 2,281 · see citing works
Parameter-efficient transfer learning for NLP
Houlsby, N., Giurgiu, A., Jastrzebski, S., Morrone, B., de Laroussilhe, Q., Gesmundo, A., Attariyan, M., & Gelly, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.00751 · Cited by 2,270 · see citing works
Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240 · see citing works
Self-citationShortcut learning in deep neural networks
Geirhos, R., Jacobsen, J.-H., Michaelis, C., Zemel, R., Brendel, W., Bethge, M., & Wichmann, F. A. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00257-z · Cited by 2,224 · see citing works
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension
Lévy, R. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006 · Cited by 2,220 · see citing works
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective
the Precise4Q consortium, Amann, J., Blasimme, A., Vayena, E., Frey, D., & Madai, V. I. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6 · Cited by 2,203 · see citing works
Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life
Nissenbaum, H. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9780804772891 · Cited by 2,129 · see citing works
ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks
Lu, J., Batra, D., Parikh, D., & Lee, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.02265 · Cited by 2,109 · see citing works
Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers
Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403723101 · Cited by 2,103 · see citing works
Don’t Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks
Gururangan, S., Marasović, A., Swayamdipta, S., Lo, K., Beltagy, I., Downey, D., & Smith, N. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.740 · Cited by 2,103 · see citing works
MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision
Tolstikhin, I., Houlsby, N., Kolesnikov, A., Beyer, L., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Yung, J., Steiner, A., Keysers, D., Uszkoreit, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.01601 · Cited by 2,087 · see citing works
Deeper Depth Prediction with Fully Convolutional Residual Networks
Laina, I., Rupprecht, C., Belagiannis, V., Tombari, F., & Navab, N. (2016) · International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2016.32 · Cited by 2,061 · see citing works
Nash, J. C. (2008) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.2008.4 · Cited by 1,995 · see citing works
Levine, S., Pastor, P., Krizhevsky, A., Ibarz, J., & Quillen, D. (2018) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364917710318 · Cited by 1,971 · see citing works
A Reduction of Imitation Learning and Structured Prediction to No-Regret Online Learning
Ross, S., Gordon, G. J., & Bagnell, J. A. (2018) · Carnegie Mellon University · doi:10.1184/r1/6550949 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
(2010) · Cited by 1,906 · see citing works
Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine
Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2019) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1312 · Cited by 1,885 · see citing works
Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Ziebart, B. D., Maas, A. L., Bagnell, J. A., & Dey, A. K. (2018) · doi:10.1184/r1/6555512 · Cited by 1,868 · see citing works
Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning
Poplin, R., Varadarajan, A. V., Blumer, K., Liu, Y., McConnell, M. V., Corrado, G. S., Peng, L., & Webster, D. R. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0195-0 · Cited by 1,865 · see citing works
Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environments
Chang, A., Dai, A., Funkhouser, T., Halber, M., Niebner, M., Savva, M., Song, S., Zeng, A., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · 2017 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2017.00081 · Cited by 1,858 · see citing works
Self-citationPlanning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI
Segler, M. H. S., Preuss, M., & Waller, M. P. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25978 · Cited by 1,847 · see citing works
Language Models as Knowledge Bases?
Petroni, F., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., Lewis, P., Bakhtin, A., Wu, Y., & Miller, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1250 · Cited by 1,834 · see citing works
Self-citationRadical construction grammar : syntactic theory in typological perspective
Croft, W. (2001) · Cited by 1,822 · see citing works
Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-3075 · Cited by 1,820 · see citing works
Curiosity-Driven Exploration by Self-Supervised Prediction
Pathak, D., Agrawal, P., Efros, A. A., & Darrell, T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2017.70 · Cited by 1,815 · see citing works
Pharmacogenomics Knowledge for Personalized Medicine
Whirl‐Carrillo, M., McDonagh, E. M., Hebert, J. M., Gong, L., Sangkuhl, K., Thorn, C. F., Altman, R. B., & Klein, T. E. (2012) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.2012.96 · Cited by 1,791 · see citing works
Self-citationJunction Tree Variational Autoencoder for Molecular Graph GenerationPreprint
Jin, W.-G., Barzilay, R., & Jaakkola, T. (2018) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.04364 · Cited by 1,783 · see citing works
CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning
Johnson, J., Hariharan, B., van der Maaten, L., Fei-Fei, L., Zitnick, C. L., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.215 · Cited by 1,781 · see citing works
Self-citationScaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · see citing works
Self-citationMoment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation
Peng, X., Bai, Q., Xia, X., Huang, Z., Saenko, K., & Wang, B. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00149 · Cited by 1,731 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in digital pathology — new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology
Bera, K., Schalper, K. A., Rimm, D. L., Velcheti, V., & Madabhushi, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y · Cited by 1,698 · see citing works
Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty
Jean, N., Burke, M., Xie, M., Davis, W. M., Lobell, D. B., & Ermon, S. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf7894 · Cited by 1,664 · see citing works
Self-citationFairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598 · Cited by 1,631 · see citing works
mT5: A Massively Multilingual Pre-trained Text-to-Text Transformer
Xue, L., Constant, N., Roberts, A., Kale, M., Al-Rfou, R., Siddhant, A., Barua, A., & Raffel, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.41 · Cited by 1,629 · see citing works
The Normative Structure of Science
Merton, R. Κ. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,625 · see citing works
Evasion attacks against machine learning at test time
Biggio, B., Corona, I., Maiorca, D., Nelson, B. A., Srndic, N., Laskov, P., Giacinto, G., & Roli, F. (2013) · Cited by 1,622 · see citing works
(2000) · doi:10.2460/ajvr.67.2.323 · Cited by 1,621 · see citing works
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615 · see citing works
Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Server
Chen, X., Fang, H., Lin, T.-Y., Vedantam, R., Gupta, S., Dollar, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.00325 · Cited by 1,614 · see citing works
Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translation
Liu, Y., Gu, J., Goyal, N., Li, X., Edunov, S., Ghazvininejad, M., Lewis, M., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00343 · Cited by 1,608 · see citing works
Self-citationA primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works
Rogers, A., Kovaleva, O., & Rumshisky, A. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00349 · Cited by 1,552 · see citing works
Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning
Blitzer, J., McDonald, R., & Pereira, F. (2006) · Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '06 · doi:10.3115/1610075.1610094 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018
Wouters, O. J., McKee, M., & Luyten, J. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1166 · Cited by 1,531 · see citing works
The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven ScenariosPreprint
McKibbin, W. J., & Fernando, R. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3547729 · Cited by 1,526 · see citing works
Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions
Koh, P. W., & Liang, P. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04730 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
Self-citationMeta-learning with memory-augmented neural networks
Santoro, A., Bartunov, S., Botvinick, M., Wierstra, D., & Lillicrap, T. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 1,504 · see citing works
NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimation
Dinh, L., Krueger, D., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.8516 · Cited by 1,493 · see citing works
Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces
Horvitz, E. (1999) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems the CHI is the limit - CHI '99 · doi:10.1145/302979.303030 · Cited by 1,490 · see citing works
Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robots
Hwangbo, J., Lee, J., Dosovitskiy, A., Bellicoso, D., Tsounis, V., Koltun, V., & Hutter, M. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aau5872 · Cited by 1,482 · see citing works
ERNIE: Enhanced Language Representation with Informative Entities
Zhang, Z., Han, X., Liu, Z., Jiang, X., Sun, M., & Liu, Q. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1139 · Cited by 1,482 · see citing works
Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory
Loevinger, J. (1957) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1957.3.3.635 · Cited by 1,476 · see citing works
The “Something Something” Video Database for Learning and Evaluating Visual Common Sense
Goyal, R., Kahou, S. E., Michalski, V., Materzynska, J., Westphal, S., Kim, H., Haenel, V., Fruend, I., Yianilos, P., Mueller-Freitag, M., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.622 · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
Frustratingly Easy Domain AdaptationPreprint
Daumé, H. (2009) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0907.1815 · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster TrainingPreprint
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.00298 · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution
Song, Y., & Ermon, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.05600 · Cited by 1,453 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
47 of the 1094 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- §4.6: Data. Data is the lifeblood of foundation models; the training data of these models largely determines what these capabilities these models can acquire. The centrality of data is not unique to foundation models; recent calls for data-centric AI [Press 2021; Ré 2021] indicate the pervasive importance of managing, understanding, and documenting data used to train machine learning models. For foundation models specifically, the current modus operandi is for training data to be selected using unspecified or unclear principles with a general lack of transparency regarding the nature of training data. We believe an alternative approach is needed to re-imagine the data ecosys- tem surrounding foundation models: we draw upon work on data visualization and management to propose a data hub for foundation models. We articulate how this proposal relates to many of the relevant data-centric considerations for foundation models: selection, curation, documentation, access, visualization and inspection, quality assessment, and legal regulation.
- From family court to criminal justice and from environmental policy to corporate transactions, the reach of the law is vast. In the United States,31 there are over 1.3M lawyers [American Bar Association 2021] and annual revenues for legal services exceed $300B [MarketLine 2021]. Yet "access to justice" remains far out of reach for most. Legal services can be prohibitively expensive. Roughly 86% of low-income individuals with civil legal problems in the United States, for instance, report receiving inadequate or no legal help [Legal Services Corporation 2017]. Evenwhen counsel is appointed, lawyers might be strained by increasingly large caseloads. Studies have shown that public defenders, for example, are often overworked and underfunded [Lefstein and Spagenberg 2009; Schumm 2012; American Bar Association 2004]. The U.S. Department of Justice reported that in 2007, 73% of county-based public defender offices exceeded the maximum recommended limit of cases received per attorney and 15 of 19 reporting state public defender programs exceeded the maximum recommended limit of felony or misdemeanor cases per attorney [Farole and Langston 2010; Langston and Farole 2010]. Even in a country with one of the highest per capita rates of attorneys, justice can appear out of reach. U.S. President Jimmy Carter once opined, "Ninety percent of our lawyers serve ten percent of our people. We are overlawyered and underrepresented" [Carter 1978]. According to a leading voice in access to justice, technology may provide a path forward [Rhode 2014], a view echoed by many others [Cabral et al. 2012].
- 60 Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM) can pose insurmountable obstacles to the successful deployment of traditional models. In contrast, their flexibility and capability to learn from few examples suggest that foundation models could be uniquely positioned to address the aforementioned challenges. Throughout this section, foundation models may take as context many modalities as evidence: audio during trial proceedings, video and images during discovery, and text in conducting legal research. Yet, the majority of legal tasks in which reliance on foundation models will be beneficial involve text-based inputs and outputs. As such, we mainly focus on text-based domains while only briefly discussing others. To ground the discussion, Figure 13 describes the stages of a civil lawsuit in the United States and where foundation models might come into play in this process. Figure 14 shows the logic flow required to generate just part of one paragraph of a legal brief, which might serve as a concrete example of a task that foundation models might one day be used for. An Important Consideration. Before proceeding, we note that the ethical, legal, and fairness considerations expanded on in §5.6: ethics, §5.4: legality, and §5.1: fairness are particularly important to examine before using foundation models in an applied legal or government context, as these applications often have important, real-world consequences to those affected [Surden 2020]. Foundation models must also be thoroughly scrutinized before deployment, as discussed in §4.4: evaluation. For example, the legal system places particular emphasis on — and may even mandate — transparency, accountability, and explainability. Consequently, it is questionable whether current models are positioned to solve many of the most pressing, legal problems. Nonetheless, the need to expand and improve access to legal and government services provides a worthy goal for foundation models.
- Once a client speaks with an attorney, prior to civil litigation, the attorney may seek to avoid a costly trial. At this stage, they can rely on foundation models to evaluate contracts, review terms of service, find relevant patents, and conduct other pre-litigation processes in order to ensure that their clients are at an advantage [Betts and Jaep 2017; Elwany et al. 2019; Lippi et al. 2019; Lee and Hsiang 2019; Hendrycks et al. 2021c; Hegel et al. 2021]. Notably, recent work has both described the challenges and benefits of using foundation models for contract review [Leivaditi et al. 2020; Hegel et al. 2021; Hendrycks et al. 2021c]. In addition to reviewing and drafting legal documents, client interactions and documents can be translated to reduce costs and barriers to the provision of legal services [Cuéllar 2019]. But translation of legal documents requires precision and an understanding of highly technical language, which makes collecting training data costly. Additionally, translating client statements or trial proceedings often requires an understanding of local dialects and language. This, too, makes it difficult to collect enough ground truth translation data to train on. As a result, traditional supervised methods rarely achieve the level of accuracy required in the legal domain [Vieira et al. 2020]. Foundation models may improve performance in this area over fully supervised mechanisms by adapting quickly in these low-resource contexts.
- Long Documents and Narratives. To achieve this goal, the model must be able to read long contexts and produce long narratives. Legal documents tend to be far longer than documents in any other context. The average U.S. Supreme Court opinion contains around 4,700 words,37 a brief on the merits to the Supreme Court can have as many as 15,000 words,38 a law review article often contains 20,000 to 30,000 words,39 parole transcripts can be hundreds of pages long [Bell et al. 2021], and trial records can be even longer. Current foundation models have struggled with such long contexts and outputs (see §4.1: modeling for more discussion).
- Alec Radford and Karthik Narasimhan. 2018. Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training. Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, and Ilya Sutskever. 2018. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. Technical Report. OpenAI. Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog 1, 8 (2019). Kira Radinsky. 2015. Data monopolists like Google are threatening the economy. Harvard Business Review 2 (2015). Evani Radiya-Dixit and Florian Tramèr. 2021. Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.14851 (2021). JackWRae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, KatieMillican, JordanHoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, SarahHenderson, · arXiv
- Roman Ring, Susannah Young, et al. 2021. Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446 (2021). · arXiv
- Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2019. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10683 (2019). · arXiv
- Samyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. 2020. ZeRO: Memory Optimizations toward Training Trillion Parameter Models. In SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. IEEE, 1–16.
- Alexander Ratner, Stephen H. Bach, Henry Ehrenberg, Jason Fries, Sen Wu, and Christopher Ré. 2017. Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervision. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB) (2017).
- Theodoros Rekatsinas, Manas Joglekar, Hector Garcia-Molina, Aditya Parameswaran, and Christopher Ré. 2017b. Slimfast: Guaranteed results for data fusion and source reliability. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data. 1399–1414.
- Press. Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Tongshuang Wu, Carlos Guestrin, and Sameer Singh. 2020. Beyond accuracy: Behavioral testing of
- Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL) 8 (2020), 842–866. David Rolnick, Priya L Donti, Lynn H Kaack, Kelly Kochanski, Alexandre Lacoste, Kris Sankaran, Andrew Slavin Ross,
- Keshav Santhanam, Siddharth Krishna, Ryota Tomioka, Andrew Fitzgibbon, and Tim Harris. 2021. DistIR: An Intermediate Representation for Optimizing Distributed Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Machine Learning and Systems. 15–23.
- Nikunj Saunshi, Sadhika Malladi, and Sanjeev Arora. 2020b. A Mathematical Exploration of Why Language Models Help Solve Downstream Tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03648 (2020). · arXiv
- Manolis Savva, Abhishek Kadian, Oleksandr Maksymets, Yili Zhao, Erik Wijmans, Bhavana Jain, Julian Straub, Jia Liu, Vladlen Koltun, Jitendra Malik, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2019b. Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Research. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
- Londa Schiebinger. 2013. Machine Translation: Analyzing Gender. (2013). http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case- studies/nlp.html#tabs-2 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045438 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045438 https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045438 https://www.therobotreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2020-Research-Brief-Sanneman-Fourie-Shah.pdf https://www.therobotreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2020-Research-Brief-Sanneman-Fourie-Shah.pdf http://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/santoro16.html https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1163 https://doi.org/10.1086/667722 https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1086/667722 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145639 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145639 https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145639 https://aclanthology.org/2021.eacl-main.20 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.185 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.185 http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case-studies/nlp.html#tabs-2 http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case-studies/nlp.html#tabs-2 · DOI
- Abigail See, Aneesh Pappu, Rohun Saxena, Akhila Yerukola, and Christopher D. Manning. 2019. Do Massively Pretrained Language Models Make Better Storytellers?. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL). Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China, 843–861. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/ K19-1079 · DOI
- Rico Sennrich, B. Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. 2016. Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units. ArXiv abs/1508.07909 (2016). · arXiv
- Ali Shafahi, Parsa Saadatpanah, Chen Zhu, Amin Ghiasi, Christoph Studer, David Jacobs, and Tom Goldstein. 2019. Adver- sarially robust transfer learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.08232 (2019). · arXiv
- Noam Shazeer, Azalia Mirhoseini, Krzysztof Maziarz, Andy Davis, Quoc Le, Geoffrey Hinton, and Jeff Dean. 2017. Outra- geously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06538 (2017). · arXiv
- Noam Shazeer and Mitchell Stern. 2018. Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Cost. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 4596–4604.
- Bokui Shen, Fei Xia, Chengshu Li, Roberto Martın-Martın, Linxi Fan, Guanzhi Wang, Claudia D'Arpino, Shyamal Buch, Sanjana Srivastava, Lyne P Tchapmi, Kent Vainio, Li Fei-Fei, and Silvio Savarese. 2021a. iGibson, a Simulation Environment for Interactive Tasks in Large Realistic Scenes. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2021).
- Haichen Shen, Lequn Chen, Yuchen Jin, Liangyu Zhao, Bingyu Kong, Matthai Philipose, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and Ravi Sundaram. 2019. Nexus: A GPU Cluster Engine for Accelerating DNN-Based Video Analysis. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. 322–337.
- Ben Shneiderman and Pattie Maes. 1997. Direct manipulation vs. interface agents. In Interactions. ACM. Mohammad Shoeybi, Mostofa Patwary, Raul Puri, Patrick LeGresley, Jared Casper, and Bryan Catanzaro. 2019. Megatron-LM:
- Nate Soares, Benja Fallenstein, Stuart Armstrong, and Eliezer Yudkowsky. 2015. Corrigibility. In Workshops at the Twenty- Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
- Irene Solaiman and Christy Dennison. 2021. Process for Adapting LanguageModels to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted Datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10328 (2021). · arXiv
- Steven J. Spencer, Christine Logel, and Paul G. Davies. 2016. Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology 67 (2016), 415–437.
- Linguistics (ACL). R. Srivastava, Pranav Shyam, Filipe Wall Mutz, Wojciech Jaśkowski, and J. Schmidhuber. 2019. Training Agents using
- Cell 180, 4 (2020), 688–702.
- Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, JasonWeston, Rob Fergus, et al. 2015. End-to-endmemory networks. InAdvances in neural information processing systems. 2440–2448.
- Flood Sung, Yongxin Yang, Li Zhang, Tao Xiang, Philip HS Torr, and Timothy M Hospedales. 2018. Learning to compare: Relation network for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1199–1208.
- Harry Surden. 2020. The ethics of artificial intelligence in law: Basic questions. Forthcoming chapter in Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (2020), 19–29.
- Abhijit Suresh, Jennifer Jacobs, Vivian Lai, Chenhao Tan, Wayne Ward, James H Martin, and Tamara Sumner. 2021. Using Transformers to Provide Teachers with Personalized Feedback on their Classroom Discourse: The TalkMoves Application. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/15009 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3489440 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-review/article/abs/improving-ratings-audit-in-the-british-university-system/FC2EE640C0C44E3DB87C29FB666E9AAB https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-review/article/abs/improving-ratings-audit-in-the-british-university-system/FC2EE640C0C44E3DB87C29FB666E9AAB https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376315 https://doi.org/10.2172/1172643 https://doi.org/10.2172/1172643 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04838 https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11825 · DOI · Paper page
- Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. 2014. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
- Andrew Szot, Alex Clegg, Eric Undersander, Erik Wijmans, Yili Zhao, John Turner, Noah Maestre, Mustafa Mukadam, Devendra Chaplot, Oleksandr Maksymets, Aaron Gokaslan, Vladimir Vondrus, Sameer Dharur, Franziska Meier, Wojciech Galuba, Angel Chang, Zsolt Kira, Vladlen Koltun, Jitendra Malik, Manolis Savva, and Dhruv Batra. 2021. Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their Habitat. arXiv:2106.14405 [cs.LG] · arXiv
- Alex Tamkin, Miles Brundage, Jack Clark, and Deep Ganguli. 2021a. Understanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Models. arXiv:2102.02503 [cs.CL] · arXiv
- Hao Tan and Mohit Bansal. 2020. Vokenization: Improving Language Understanding via Contextualized, Visually-Grounded Supervision. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2066–2080.
- Navlab. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 10, 3 (1988), 362–373. Simon Thorpe, Denis Fize, and Catherine Marlot. 1996. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381, 6582
- Christopher Tosh, Akshay Krishnamurthy, and Daniel Hsu. 2021. Contrastive learning, multi-view redundancy, and linear models. In Algorithmic Learning Theory. PMLR, 1179–1206.
- Florian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter, and Thomas Ristenpart. 2016. Stealing machine learning models via prediction APIs. In USENIX Security.
- Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai, Yue Wu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2020. Self-supervised learning from a multi-view perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05576 (2020). · arXiv
- 13th International Conference, CICM 2020, Bertinoro, Italy, July 26-31, 2020, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12236), Christoph Benzmüller and Bruce R. Miller (Eds.). Springer, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53518- 6_24 · DOI
- Manasi Vartak, Harihar Subramanyam, Wei-En Lee, Srinidhi Viswanathan, Saadiyah Husnoo, Samuel Madden, and Matei Zaharia. 2016. ModelDB: a system for machine learning model management. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human- In-the-Loop Data Analytics. 1–3.
- Pascal Vincent, Hugo Larochelle, Yoshua Bengio, , and Pierre-Antoine Manzagol. 2008. Extracting and Composing Robust Features with Denoising Autoencoders. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
- Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 6380 (2018),
- Alex Wang, Amapreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R Bowman. 2019b. GLUE: A Multi- Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
- Zihan Wang, K Karthikeyan, Stephen Mayhew, and Dan Roth. 2020b. Extending Multilingual BERT to Low-Resource Languages. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Findings. 2649– 2656.
- Zirui Wang, Zachary C Lipton, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2020d. On Negative Interference in Multilingual Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 4438–4450.
- Ken Weiner. 2018. Can AI Create True Art? Scientific American (2018). https://github.com/kingoflolz/mesh-transformer-jax https://github.com/kingoflolz/mesh-transformer-jax https://github.com/kingoflolz/mesh-transformer-jax https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/d2a27e83d429f0dcae6b937cf440aeb1-Abstract.html http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13640 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-3012 https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09226 · DOI
- Jason Weston, Sumit Chopra, and Antoine Bordes. 2014. Memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.3916 (2014). Michelle Whirl-Carrillo, Ellen M McDonagh, JM Hebert, Li Gong, K Sangkuhl, CF Thorn, Russ B Altman, and Teri E Klein. · arXiv
- Bernard Williams. 1973. In Utilitarianism: For and Against, J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 82–118.
- Langdon Winner. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109, 1 (1980), 121–136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652 Publisher: The MIT Press.
- L. Wittgenstein. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford. Thomas Wolf, Julien Chaumond, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Morgan
- Student Feedback. arxiv (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215584758 https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215584758 https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333636 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1735 https://arxiv.org/abs/https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/articlepdf/2740808/jamadermatology_winkler_2019_oi_190038.pdf http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652 https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i4.2490 · DOI · Paper page
- Shijie Wu and Mark Dredze. 2020. Are All Languages Created Equal in Multilingual BERT?. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP. 120–130. https://aclanthology.org/2020.repl4nlp-1.16
- Learning. arXiv:2008.05659 [cs.CV] Michael Xie, Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, David Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. 2016. Transfer Learning from Deep Features for · arXiv
- Sang Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, and Tengyu Ma. 2021c. An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02080 (2021). · arXiv
- Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn P Rose, , and John Zimmerman. 2020. Re-examiningWhether, Why, and HowHuman-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1077 https://aclanthology.org/2020.repl4nlp-1.16 https://openreview.net/forum?id=O6LPudowNQm https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05659 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.190 · DOI
- Journal of experimental psychology: General 130, 1 (2001), 29.
- Manzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie, Chris Alberti, Santiago Ontanon, Philip Pham, Anirudh Ravula, Qifan Wang, Li Yang, et al. 2020. Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequences.. In NeurIPS.
- Elad Ben Zaken, Shauli Ravfogel, and Yoav Goldberg. 2021. BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer- based Masked Language-models. CoRR abs/2106.10199 (2021). arXiv:2106.10199 https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10199 · arXiv
- Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Hannah Rashkin, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, Franziska Roesner, and Yejin Choi. 2019b. Defending Against Neural Fake News. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). 9054–9065.
- Xiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, and Lucas Beyer. 2021. Scaling vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.04560 (2021). · arXiv
- T. Zhang and T. Hashimoto. 2020. On the Inductive Bias of Masked Language Modeling: From Statistical to Syntactic Dependencies. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
- Xingliang Zhang and Degan Shu. 2021. Current understanding on the Cambrian Explosion: questions and answers. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 95 (2021), 641–660.
- Mengjie Zhao, Tao Lin, Fei Mi, Martin Jaggi, and Hinrich Schütze. 2020b. Masking as an Efficient Alternative to Finetuning for Pretrained Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 2226–2241. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp- main.174 · DOI
- Nature communications 11, 1 (2020), 1–9.
- Jin Peng Zhou, Yuhuai Wu, Colin Li, and Roger Grosse. 2021c. REFACTOR: Learning to Extract Theorems from Proofs. The First Mathematical Reasoning in General Artificial Intelligence Workshop, ICLR 2021 (2021). https://mathai-iclr.github.io/ papers/papers/MATHAI_22_paper.pdf
- Kaitlyn Zhou, Kawin Ethayarajh, and Dan Jurafsky. 2021a. Frequency-based Distortions in ContextualizedWord Embeddings. ArXiv abs/2104.08465 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08465 · arXiv
- Annette Zimmermann. 2021. Stop Building Bad AI. Boston Review (July 2021). https://bostonreview.net/science-nature/ annette-zimmermann-stop-building-bad-ai
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A. C., Lo, W.-Y., et al. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00371 · Cited by 11,953 · see citing works
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge language models encode clinical knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 · Cited by 4,083 · see citing works
Large language models in medicine
Thirunavukarasu, A. J., Ting, D. S. J., Elangovan, K., Gutierrez, L., Tan, T. F., & Ting, D. S. W. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8 · Cited by 3,944 · see citing works
Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models
Zhou, K., Yang, J., Loy, C. C., & Liu, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-022-01653-1 · Cited by 3,304 · see citing works
“…to the adaptation of large vision-4 language models in computer vision—which we view as an important topic for democratizing foundation models (Bommasani et al., 2021)—and justify that prompt learning not only brings significant improvements to computer vision tasks in terms of transfer…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationChatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 · Cited by 3,087 · see citing works
A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Yi, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3641289 · Cited by 2,842 · see citing works
“Recently, large language models (LLMs) have incited substantial interest across both academic and industrial domains [9, 207, 243].”
BackgroundSelf-citationPaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., Barham, P., Chung, H. W., Sutton, C., Gehrmann, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02311 · Cited by 2,590 · see citing works
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Park, J. S., O'Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606763 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
Self-citationFoundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence
Moor, M., Banerjee, O., Abad, Z. S. H., Krumholz, H. M., Leskovec, J., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4 · Cited by 2,028 · see citing works
Self-citationJia, M., Tang, L., Chen, B.-C., Cardie, C., Belongie, S., Hariharan, B., & Lim, S.-N. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19827-4_41 · Cited by 1,965 · see citing works
Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models
Zhou, K., Yang, J., Loy, C. C., & Liu, Z. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01631 · Cited by 1,918 · see citing works
Self-citationScientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence.
Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2 · Cited by 1,823 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards a general-purpose foundation model for computational pathology
Chen, R. J., Ding, T., Lu, M. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., Jaume, G., Song, A. H., Chen, B., Zhang, A., Shao, D., Shaban, M., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02857-3 · Cited by 1,560 · see citing works
A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q.-L., & Tang, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2023.123618 · Cited by 1,452 · see citing works
Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
scGPT: Towards Building a Foundation Model for Single-Cell Multi-omics Using Generative AI
Cui, H., Wang, C., Maan, H., Pang, K., Luo, F., & Wang, B. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.30.538439 · Cited by 1,383 · see citing works
“One promising approach to address this challenge is the generative pre-training of founda39 tion models [16, 17].”
BackgroundDepth Anything: Unleashing the Power of Large-Scale Unlabeled Data
Yang, L., Kang, B., Huang, Z., Xu, X., Feng, J., & Zhao, H. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00987 · Cited by 1,296 · see citing works
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large-scale pre-trained language models
Ding, N., Qin, Y., Yang, G., Wei, F., Yang, Z., Su, Y., Hu, S., Chen, Y., Chan, C.-M., Chen, W., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00626-4 · Cited by 1,191 · see citing works
Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners
Wei, J., Bosma, M., Zhao, V. Y., Guu, K., Yu, A. W., Lester, B., Du, N., Dai, A. M., & Le, Q. V. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01652 · Cited by 1,101 · see citing works
A Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC)
Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3704262 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision
Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Vo, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V., Fernandez, P., Haziza, D., Massa, F., El-Nouby, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.07193 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
“Following this paradigm shift in NLP, we expect similar “foundation” models to appear in computer vision (Bommasani et al., 2021).”
MethodInfluentialA foundation model for generalizable disease detection from retinal images
Zhou, Y., Chia, M. A., Wagner, S. K., Ayhan, M. S., Williamson, D. J., Struyven, R. R., Liu, T., Xu, M., Lozano, M. G., Woodward-Court, P., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06555-x · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
SpectralGPT: Spectral Remote Sensing Foundation Model
Hong, D., Zhang, B., Li, X., Li, Y., Li, C., Yao, J. T., Yokoya, N., Li, H., Ghamisi, P., Jia, X., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3362475 · Cited by 1,002 · see citing works
Self-citationBrynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31161 · Cited by 995 · see citing works
Self-citationThe rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Self-citationTruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods
Lin, S., Hilton, J., & Evans, O. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.229 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts
Zamfirescu-Pereira, J. D., Wong, R. Y., Hartmann, B., & Yang, Q. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581388 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey
Yang, J., Zhou, K., Li, Y., & Liu, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-02117-4 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Self-citationA large language model for electronic health records
Yang, X., Chen, A., PourNejatian, N., Shin, H. C., Smith, K. E., Parisien, C., Compas, C., Martin, C., Costa, A. B., Flores, M. G., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00742-2 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
Self-citationPerkins, M. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.02.07 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools
M. Bran, A., Cox, S., Schilter, O., Baldassari, C., White, A. D., & Schwaller, P. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00832-8 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data
Shumailov, I., Shumaylov, Z., Zhao, Y., Papernot, N., Anderson, R., & Gal, Y. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07566-y · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Yenduri, G., Ramalingam, M., Selvi, G. C., Supriya, Y., Srivastava, G., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Raj, G. D., Jhaveri, R. H., Prabadevi, B., Wang, W., et al. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3389497 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Self-citationTaxonomy of Risks posed by Language Models
Weidinger, L., Uesato, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Huang, P.-S., Mellor, J., Glaese, A., Cheng, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533088 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
A Survey on In-context Learning
Dong, Q., Li, L., Dai, D., Zheng, C., Ma, J., Li, R., Xia, H., Xu, J., Wu, Z., Chang, B., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Harnessing the power of llms in practice: a survey on chatGPT and beyond
Yang, J., Jin, H., Tang, R., Han, X., Feng, Q., Jiang, H., Zhong, S., Yin, B., & Hu, X. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3649506 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization
Sanh, V., Webson, A., Raffel, C., Bach, S. H., Sutawika, L., Alyafeai, Z., Chaffin, A., Stiegler, A., Scao, T. L., Raja, A., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08207 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Model
Singh, A., Hu, R., Goswami, V., Couairon, G., Galuba, W., Rohrbach, M., & Kiela, D. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01519 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Prompts
Lüddecke, T., & Ecker, A. S. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00695 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Large-scale chemical language representations capture molecular structure and properties
Ross, J., Belgodere, B., Chenthamarakshan, V., Padhi, I., Mroueh, Y., & Das, P. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00580-7 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?
Ziems, C., Held, W., Shaikh, O., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., & Yang, D. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00502 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection
Vorontsov, E., Bozkurt, A., Casson, A., Shaikovski, G., Zelechowski, M., Severson, K., Zimmermann, E., Hall, J., Tenenholtz, N., Fusi, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03141-0 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Self-citationAligning artificial intelligence with climate change mitigation
Kaack, L. H., Donti, P. L., Strubell, E., Kamiya, G., Creutzig, F., & Rolnick, D. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01377-7 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology
Antaki, F., Touma, S., Milad, D., El-Khoury, J., & Duval, R. (2023) · Ophthalmology Science · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2023.100324 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Greshake, K., Abdelnabi, S., Mishra, S., Endres, C., Holz, T., & Fritz, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security · doi:10.1145/3605764.3623985 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3
Binz, M., & Schulz, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2218523120 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence
Schwartz, R., Vassilev, A., Greene, K., Perine, L., Burt, A., & Hall, P. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.1270 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
“uncertainty[104] (as described in Section 3.”
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
“There is also a growing set of studies examining specific economic impacts and opportunities for LLMs (Bommasani et al., 2021; Felten et al., 2023; Korinek, 2023; Mollick and Mollick, 2022; Noy and Zhang, 2023; Peng et al., 2023).”
BackgroundWu, T., Terry, M. A., & Cai, C. J. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517582 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Masking
Wang, L., Huang, B., Zhao, Z., Tong, Z., He, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Qiao, Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01398 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
RemoteCLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model for Remote Sensing
Liu, F., Chen, D., Guan, Z., Zhou, X., Zhu, J., Ye, Q., Fu, L., & Zhou, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3390838 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14314 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
“Widespread use of LLMs has known dangers [8, 6], but we believe that equalizing access to a technology that is quickly becoming ubiquitous will allow for better more independent analysis than keeping the power of LLMs in the hands of large corporations that do not release models or source code for…”
BackgroundTowards Generalist Biomedical AI
Tu, T., Azizi, S., Driess, D., Schaekermann, M., Amin, M., Chang, P.-C., Carroll, A., Lau, C., Tanno, R., Ktena, I., et al. (2024) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2300138 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Holistic Evaluation of Language Models
Bommasani, R., Liang, P., & Lee, T. (2023) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.15007 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Self-citationTinyViT: Fast Pretraining Distillation for Small Vision Transformers
Wu, K., Zhang, J., Peng, H., Liu, M., Xiao, B., Fu, J., & Yuan, L. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19803-8_5 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models
Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594067 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
“The AI models covered by this contribution are often referred to as ‘foundation models’ [36], ‘large language models’ (LLMs) [37] or ‘large generative models’ (LGAIMs–the term adopted in this article) [38].”
BackgroundRepurposing Diffusion-Based Image Generators for Monocular Depth Estimation
Ke, B., Obukhov, A., Huang, S., Metzger, N., Daudt, R. C., & Schindler, K. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00907 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
Huang, J., & Chang, K. C.-C. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.67 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Self-citationRobust fine-tuning of zero-shot models
Wortsman, M., Ilharco, G., Kim, J. W., Li, M., Kornblith, S., Roelofs, R., Lopes, R. G., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., Namkoong, H., et al. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00780 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
SAM-Adapter: Adapting Segment Anything in Underperformed Scenes
Chen, T., Zhu, L., Ding, C., Cao, R., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Li, Z., Sun, L., Zang, Y., & Mao, P. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw60793.2023.00361 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Dawn of the Transformer Era in Speech Emotion Recognition: Closing the Valence Gap
Wagner, J., Triantafyllopoulos, A., Wierstorf, H., Schmitt, M., Burkhardt, F., Eyben, F., & Schuller, B. W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3263585 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Comprehensive Review
Ahmad, K., Iqbal, W., Elhassan, A., Qadir, J., Benhaddou, D., Ayyash, M., & Al‐Fuqaha, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3314610 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarization
Zhang, T., Ladhak, F., Durmus, E., Liang, P., McKeown, K., & Hashimoto, T. B. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00632 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Self-citationA study of generative large language model for medical research and healthcare
Peng, C., Yang, X., Chen, A., Smith, K. E., PourNejatian, N., Costa, A. B., Martin, C., Flores, M. G., Zhang, Y., Magoc, T., et al. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00958-w · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationSustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities
Wu, C.-J., Raghavendra, R., Gupta, U., Acun, B., Ardalani, N., Maeng, K., Chang, G., Behram, F. A., Huang, J., Bai, C., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.00364 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Self-citationPre-Trained Language Models and Their Applications
Wang, H., Li, J., Wu, H. R., Hovy, E. H., & Sun, Y. (2022) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2022.04.024 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey
He, Y., & Xiao, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3334614 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Haltaufderheide, J., & Ranisch, R. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01157-x · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Large Language Models in Medicine: The Potentials and Pitfalls
Omiye, J. A., Gui, H., Rezaei, S. J., Zou, J., & Daneshjou, R. (2024) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m23-2772 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Stade, E. C., Stirman, S. W., Ungar, L. H., Boland, C. L., Schwartz, H. A., Yaden, D. B., Sedoc, J., DeRubeis, R. J., Willer, R., & Eichstaedt, J. C. (2024) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-024-00056-z · Cited by 391 · see citing works
“The advent of large language models, enabled by a combination of the deep learning technique transformers 25 and increases in computing power, has opened new possibilities 26 .”
BackgroundFlorence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Vision
Yuan, L., Chen, D., Chen, Y.-L., Codella, N., Dai, X., Gao, J., Hu, H., Huang, X., Li, B., Li, C., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.11432 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in environmental monitoring: Advancements, challenges, and future directions
Olawade, D. B., Wada, O. Z., Ige, A. O., Egbewole, B. I., Olojo, A. S., & Oladapo, B. I. (2024) · Hygiene and Environmental Health Advances · doi:10.1016/j.heha.2024.100114 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
The Robots Are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Education
Prather, J., Denny, P., Leinonen, J., Becker, B. A., Albluwi, I., Craig, M., Keuning, H., Kiesler, N., Kohn, T., Luxton-Reilly, A., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3623762.3633499 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Leveraging large language models for predictive chemistry
Jablonka, K. M., Schwaller, P., Ortega-Guerrero, A., & Smit, B. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00788-1 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English
Chalkidis, I., Jana, A., Hartung, D., Bommarito, M. J., Androutsopoulos, I., Katz, D. M., & Αλέτρας, Ν. (2021) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.297 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
LinkBERT: Pretraining Language Models with Document Links
Yasunaga, M., Leskovec, J., & Liang, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.551 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-supervised speech representation learning: A review
Mohamed, A., Lee, H.-Y., Borgholt, L., Havtorn, J. D., Edin, J., Igel, C., Kirchhoff, K., Li, S.-W., Livescu, K., Maaløe, L., et al. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2022.3207050 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
“Due to the popularity of SSL, reviews have been published about the technology in general [16], [17], [18] as well as its application to natural language processing (NLP) [19], [20],”
BackgroundCan Generative AI improve social science?
Bail, C. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314021121 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
When large language models meet personalization: perspectives of challenges and opportunities
Chen, J., Liu, Z., Huang, X., Wu, C., Liu, Q., Jiang, G., Pu, Y., Lei, Y., Chen, X., Wang, X., et al. (2024) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-024-01276-1 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Opportunities and Challenges for ChatGPT and Large Language Models in Biomedicine and Health
Tian, S., Jin, Q., Yeganova, L., Lai, P.-T., Zhu, Q., Chen, X., Yang, Y., Chen, Q., Kim, W., Comeau, D. C., et al. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad493 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
A review of deep learning techniques for speech processing
Mehrish, A., Majumder, N., Bharadwaj, R., Mihalcea, R., & Poria, S. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101869 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
CellViT: Vision Transformers for precise cell segmentation and classification
Hörst, F., Rempe, M., Heine, L., Seibold, C., Keyl, J., Baldini, G., Ugurel, S., Siveke, J. T., Grünwald, B. T., Egger, J., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103143 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress
Bengio, Y., Hinton, G., Yao, A., Song, D., Abbeel, P., Darrell, T., Harari, Y. N., Zhang, Y.-Q., Xue, L., Shalev-Shwartz, S., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adn0117 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvancing Plain Vision Transformer Toward Remote Sensing Foundation Model
Wang, D., Zhang, Q., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., Du, B., Tao, D., & Zhang, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3222818 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
White, J., Hays, S., Fu, Q., Spencer-Smith, J. B., & Schmidt, D. C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55642-5_4 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed
Jakesch, M., Hancock, J. T., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2208839120 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
The debate over understanding in AI’s large language models
Mitchell, M., & Krakauer, D. C. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2215907120 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Catalyzing next-generation Artificial Intelligence through NeuroAI
Zador, A. M., Escola, G. S., Richards, B. A., Ölveczky, B. P., Bengio, Y., Boahen, K. A., Botvinick, M., Chklovskii, D. B., Churchland, A. K., Claudia Clopath, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37180-x · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Florence-2: Advancing a Unified Representation for a Variety of Vision Tasks
Xiao, B., Wu, H., Xu, W., Dai, X., Hu, H., Lu, Y., Zeng, M., Liu, C., & Yuan, L. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00461 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
PromptCast: A New Prompt-Based Learning Paradigm for Time Series Forecasting
Xue, H., & Salim, F. D. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3342137 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
TSMixer: Lightweight MLP-Mixer Model for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting
Ekambaram, V., Jati, A., Nguyen, N. H., Sinthong, P., & Kalagnanam, J. (2023) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599533 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Profiling cell identity and tissue architecture with single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Gulati, G. S., D'Silva, J. P., Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Newman, A. M. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00768-2 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
On the conversational persuasiveness of GPT-4
Salvi, F., Ribeiro, M. H., Gallotti, R., & West, R. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02194-6 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
The shaky foundations of large language models and foundation models for electronic health records
Wornow, M., Xu, Y., Thapa, R., Patel, B., Steinberg, E., Fleming, S., Pfeffer, M. A., Fries, J., & Shah, N. H. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00879-8 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
A taxonomy of prompt modifiers for text-to-image generation
Oppenlaender, J. (2023) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2286532 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI
Denny, P., Prather, J., Becker, B. A., Finnie-Ansley, J., Hellas, A., Leinonen, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Reeves, B. N., Santos, E. A., & Sarsa, S. (2024) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3624720 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
“For example, in a deep discussion of LLMs, Bommasani et al. highlight that it will become “much more complex for teachers to understand the extent of a student’s contribution” and to “regulate ineffective collaborations and detect plagiarism” [7].”
BackgroundWortsman, M., Ilharco, G., Gadre, S. Y., Roelofs, R., Gontijo-Lopes, R., Morcos, A. S., Namkoong, H., Farhadi, A., Carmon, Y., Kornblith, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.05482 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., Donahue, C., Doumbouya, M., Durmus, E., Ermon, S., Etchemendy, J., Ethayarajh, K., Fei-Fei, L., Finn, C., Gale, T., Gillespie, L., Goel, K., Goodman, N., Grossman, S., Guha, N., Hashimoto, T., Henderson, P., Hewitt, J., Ho, D. E., Hong, J., Hsu, K., Huang, J., Icard, T., Jain, S., Jurafsky, D., Kalluri, P., Karamcheti, S., Keeling, G., Khani, F., Khattab, O., Koh, P. W., Krass, M., Krishna, R., Kuditipudi, R., Kumar, A., Ladhak, F., Lee, M., Lee, T., Leskovec, J., Levent, I., Li, X. L., Li, X., Ma, T., Malik, A., Manning, C. D., Mirchandani, S., Mitchell, E., Munyikwa, Z., Nair, S., Narayan, A., Narayanan, D., Newman, B., Nie, A., Niebles, J. C., Nilforoshan, H., Nyarko, J., Ogut, G., Orr, L., Papadimitriou, I., Park, J. S., Piech, C., Portelance, E., Potts, C., Raghunathan, A., Reich, R., Ren, H., Rong, F., Roohani, Y., Ruiz, C., Ryan, J., Ré, C., Sadigh, D., Sagawa, S., Santhanam, K., Shih, A., Srinivasan, K., Tamkin, A., Taori, R., Thomas, A. W., Tramèr, F., Wang, R. E., Wang, W., Wu, B., Wu, J., Wu, Y., Xie, S. M., Yasunaga, M., You, J., Zaharia, M., Zhang, M., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., Zhou, K., & Liang, P.
- ORCID
- Bommasani, Rishi
- Adeli, Ehsan
- Altman, Russ
- Arora, Simran
- Bernstein, Michael S.
- Bohg, Jeannette
- Bosselut, Antoine
- Brunskill, Emma
- Brynjolfsson, Erik
- Card, Dallas
- Chatterji, Niladri
- Chen, Annie
- Creel, Kathleen
- Donahue, Chris
- Doumbouya, Moussa
- Durmus, Esin
- Ermon, Stefano
- Fei-Fei, Li
- Finn, Chelsea
- Gillespie, Lauren
- Goel, Karan
- Goodman, Noah
- Grossman, Shelby
- Guha, Neel
- Hashimoto, Tatsunori
- Henderson, Peter
- Hewitt, John
- Ho, Daniel E.
- Huang, Jing
- Jurafsky, Dan
- Kalluri, Pratyusha
- Karamcheti, Siddharth
- Keeling, Geoff
- Khattab, Omar
- Koh, Pang Wei
- Krishna, Ranjay
- Kumar, Ananya
- Ladhak, Faisal
- Lee, Mina
- Leskovec, Jure
- Li, Xuechen
- Ma, Tengyu
- Malik, Ali
- Manning, Christopher D.
- Mitchell, Eric
- Nair, Suraj
- Narayanan, Deepak
- Nie, Allen
- Niebles, Juan Carlos
- Nyarko, Julian
- Orr, Laurel
- Park, Joon Sung
- Piech, Chris
- Portelance, Eva
- Potts, Christopher
- Ren, Hongyu
- Roohani, Yusuf
- Ruiz, Camilo
- Ré, Christopher
- Sadigh, Dorsa
- Santhanam, Keshav
- Srinivasan, Krishnan
- Tamkin, Alex
- Taori, Rohan
- Thomas, Armin W.
- Tramèr, Florian
- Wang, Rose E.
- Wang, William
- Wu, Jiajun
- Xie, Sang Michael
- Yasunaga, Michihiro
- You, Jiaxuan
- Zaharia, Matei
- Zhang, Michael
- Zhang, Xikun
- Zhang, Yuhui
- Zheng, Lucia
- Zhou, Kaitlyn
- Liang, Percy
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2108.07258
- OpenAlex
- W3195577433
- Semantic Scholar
- 76e9e2ec3de437ffb30d8b7b629f7fe3e61de5c2
- Cited by
- 2,676
- References
- 1,094
- Citations by year
- 2026: 287 · 2025: 669 · 2024: 816 · 2023: 640 · 2022: 215 · 2021: 46 · 2019: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- foundation models, large language models, large vision models, transfer learning, emergent capabilities, homogenization, AI risks, societal impact of AI, AI ethics, AI security, artificial intelligence in healthcare, artificial intelligence in law, artificial intelligence in education, environmental impact of AI, economic impact of AI, AI failure modes, interdisciplinary collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review