Cited by 11Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart rate and cardiovascular healthHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Predictors of abnormal heart rate recovery in patients with heart failure reduced and preserved ejection fraction

Open access
Cahalin, Lawrence P, Arena, Ross, Labate, Valentina, Bandera, Francesco, Guazzi, Marco·2014·European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart rate recovery (HRR) is becoming an important prognostic maker in heart failure (HF), but very little is known about the underlying mechanisms responsible for its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we examined echocardiographic and exercise (submaximal and maximal) characteristics to gain a better appreciation of HRR and factors responsible for the development of abnormal HRR in patients with both heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and resting 2D echocardiography were randomly performed in 240 HF patients (200 HFrEF, 40 HFpEF) after which HRR was measured. HRR was defined as the difference between heart rate at peak exercise and 1 minute following test termination. RESULTS: Bivariate correlation analyses found significant relationships among most CPX and 6MWT measurements with the highest correlations between 6MWT HRR and 6MWT peak HR (r = 0.65; p < 0.001) and CPX HRR and CPX HRreserve (r = 0.63; p < 0.001). The relationship between 6MWT HRR and CPX HRR was very good (r = 0.91; p < 001). Multivariate logistic regression of submaximal and maximal exercise found 6MWT peak HR and exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV), respectively, were the strongest predictors (p < 0.001) of abnormal HRR. The E/E' was a significant predictor (p < 0.001) of abnormal HRR, but EOV was the strongest predictor of abnormal HRR (OR = 6.5). CONCLUSIONS: HRR after both CPX and the 6MWT is significantly related to many exercise and echocardiographic measures with the most significant predictors of abnormal HRR being related to indices of cardiorespiratory performance in patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2047487313475892

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heart rate variability and heart rate recovery are non-invasive methods that provide information regarding cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic modulations of heart rate during and after exercise.

    “Heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate recovery (HRR) are non-invasive methods that provide information regarding the cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic modulations of HR during and after exercise.8,9”

    From Caffeine delays autonomic recovery following acute exercise (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction and Discussion (page numbers not provided) say that heart rate recovery after exercise reflects parasympathetic reactivation and sympathetic deactivation. The paper does not make the corresponding claim about heart rate variability; it appears only in the title of a cited reference. Thus the source supports the HRR portion, but not the statement about both methods. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]31. Brubaker PH and Kitzman DW. Chronotropic incompe- tence: causes, consequences, and management. Circulation 2011; 123: 1010-1020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cahalin, L. P., Arena, R., Labate, V., Bandera, F., & Guazzi, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Guazzi, Marco
Venue
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2013-01-18
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
906-914
ISSN
  • 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4881
OpenAlex
W2314409090
Cited by
11
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
heart rate recovery, heart failure, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, exercise oscillatory ventilation, 6-minute walk test, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, E/e' ratio, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Echocardiography, Exercise Test, Female, Heart Failure, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Stroke Volume, Exercise, Logistic Models, Exercise Tolerance, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review