Cited by 37Cardiac Health and Mental HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCancer survivorship and care

Persistent emotional distress after a first-time myocardial infarction and its association to late cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality

Lissåker, Claudia T, Norlund, Fredrika, Wallert, John, Held, Claes, Olsson, Erik MG·2019·European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

Background Patients with symptoms of depression and/or anxiety - emotional distress - after a myocardial infarction (MI) have been shown to have worse prognosis and increased healthcare costs. However, whether specific subgroups of patients with emotional distress are more vulnerable is less well established. The purpose of this study was to identify the association between different patterns of emotional distress over time with late cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality among first-MI patients aged Methods We utilized data on 57,602 consecutive patients with a first-time MI from the national SWEDEHEART registers. Emotional distress was assessed using the anxiety/depression dimension of the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions questionnaire two and 12 months after the MI, combined into persistent (emotional distress at both time-points), remittent (emotional distress at the first follow-up only), new (emotional distress at the second-follow up only) or no distress. Data on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality were obtained until the study end-time. We used multiple imputation to create complete datasets and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios. Results Patients with persistent emotional distress were more likely to die from cardiovascular (hazard ratio: 1.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.16, 1.84) and non-cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio: 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.30, 1.82) than those with no distress. Those with…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2047487319841475

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lissåker, C. T., Norlund, F., Wallert, J., Held, C., & Olsson, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Sweden
Venue
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2019-06-03
Volume
26
Issue
14
Pages
1510-1518
ISSN
  • 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4881
OpenAlex
W2948567413
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
emotional distress, depression, anxiety, first myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality, older adults, prognosis, SWEDEHEART registry
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Aged, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Registries, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Sweden, Time Factors, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review