Cited by 250Cardiac Health and Mental HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Symptom dimensions of depression following myocardial infarction and their relationship with somatic health status and cardiovascular prognosis

de Jonge, Peter, Ormel, Johan, van den Brink, Rob H.S., van Melle, Joost P., Spijkerman, Titia A., Kuijper, Astrid, van Veldhuisen, Dirk J., van den Berg, Maarten P. +3 more·2006·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The reporting of depressive symptoms following myocardial infarction may be confounded by complaints originating from the myocardial infarction. Therefore, it is difficult to estimate the effects of post-myocardial infarction depression and its treatment on cardiovascular prognosis. The authors' goal was to study the relationship between depressive symptom dimensions following myocardial infarction and both somatic health status and prospective cardiovascular prognosis. METHOD: In two studies of myocardial infarction patients (N=494 and 1,972), the Beck Depression Inventory was used to determine the dimensional structure of depressive symptoms following myocardial infarction. Three symptom dimensions-somatic/affective, cognitive/affective, and appetitive-were compared with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, Charlson comorbidity index, Killip class, and previous myocardial infarction. The relationship between depressive symptom dimensions and prospective cardiovascular mortality and cardiac-related readmissions was also examined (mean follow-up duration=2.5 years). RESULTS: Somatic/affective symptoms were associated with poor health status (left ventricular ejection fraction, Charlson comorbidity index, Killip class, and previous myocardial infarction) and predicted cardiovascular mortality and cardiac events. Cognitive/affective symptoms were only marginally associated with somatic health status and not with cardiovascular death and cardiac events. Appetitive symptoms were related to somatic health status but did not predict cardiovascular death or cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Somatic/affective depressive symptoms following myocardial infarction were confounded by somatic health status yet were prospectively associated with cardiac prognosis even after somatic health status was controlled. Cognitive/affective depressive symptoms were only marginally related to health status and not to cardiac prognosis. These findings suggest that treatment of depression following myocardial infarction might improve cardiovascular prognosis when it reduces somatic/affective symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.138

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure, somatic/affective symptoms of depression are more predictive of overall mortality than cognitive/affective symptoms of depression.

    “Indeed, several recently published papers even suggest that (in patients with myocardial infarction or with chronic heart failure) the so-called somatic/affective symptoms of depression are more predictive of overall mortality than the cognitive/affective symptoms of depression (De Jonge et al., 2006; Schiffer et al., 2009).”

    From Presence and predictors of pain in depression: Results from the FINDER study (2010) · cites this paper as De Jonge et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jonge, P., Ormel, J., van den Brink, R. H. S., van Melle, J. P., Spijkerman, T. A., Kuijper, A., van Veldhuisen, D. J., van den Berg, M. P., Honig, A., Crijns, H. J. G. M., & Schene, A. H.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-01
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
138-144
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2148022279
Cited by
250
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
FWCI
16.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-myocardial infarction depression, cognitive-affective symptoms, cardiovascular prognosis, cardiovascular mortality, cardiac readmission, left ventricular ejection fraction, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Killip class, depression treatment
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Health Status, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Netherlands, Personality Inventory, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Stroke Volume, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Comorbidity, Survival Analysis, Death, Sudden, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review