Cited by 13Hospital Admissions and OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Understanding transitional care provided to older adults with and without dementia: A mixed methods study

Prusaczyk, Beth, Fabbre, Vanessa, Morrow-Howell, Nancy, Proctor, Enola·2020·International Journal of Care Coordination

Abstract

Introduction There are numerous effective transitional care interventions yet they are not routinely implemented. Furthermore, few interventions exist for older adults with dementia. A first step in developing effective interventions for dementia patients and increasing intervention uptake for all patients is to understand the current delivery process of transitional care. Methods A mixed methods study using an explanatory multiphase design was conducted. Guided by provider interviews, medical charts were reviewed to collect information on the day-to-day transitional care being delivered to older adults. Then providers were interviewed again to assess the accuracy of those results and provide context. Results The medical charts of 210 older adults (126 with dementia and 84 without) were reviewed and nine providers representing various professional roles including social work, nursing, and case management were interviewed. Social workers and case managers were primarily involved in discharge planning, communicating with providers outside the hospital, advanced care planning, providing social and community supports, and making follow-up appointments. Registered nurses were the primary providers of patient education and medication safety while physicians were primarily involved in ensuring that necessary information was available in the discharge summary and that it was available in the chart. Discussion This study found distinct patterns in the delivery of transitional care, including the unique roles nursing, social work, and case management have in the process. Furthermore, these patterns were found to differ between patients with and without dementia. These findings are both consistent and inconsistent with the existing literature on transitional care interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2053434520908122

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prusaczyk, B., Fabbre, V., Morrow-Howell, N., & Proctor, E.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Prusaczyk, Beth
Venue
International Journal of Care Coordination
Published
2020-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
14-23
ISSN
  • 2040-4026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-4345
  • 2053-4353
OpenAlex
W3009908158
Cited by
13
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Care Coordination (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Council on Social Work Education
  • National Association of Social Workers Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
care transitions, older adults, dementia, discharge planning, care coordination, social work, case management, registered nurses, advance care planning, patient education, drug safety, follow-up care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review