Cited by 289Water Governance and InfrastructureCultural Studies and PostmodernismCybernetics and Technology in Society

Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center

Open access
Hogan, Mél·2015·Big Data & Society

Abstract

Using a new materialist line of questioning that looks at the agential potentialities of water and its entanglements with Big Data and surveillance, this article explores how the recent Snowden revelations about the National Security Agency (NSA) have reignited media scholars to engage with the infrastructures that enable intercepting, hosting, and processing immeasurable amounts of data. Focusing on the expansive architecture, location, and resource dependence of the NSA’s Utah Data Center, I demonstrate how surveillance and privacy can never be disconnected from the material infrastructures that allow and render natural the epistemological state of mass surveillance. Specifically, I explore the NSA’s infrastructure and the million of gallons of water it requires daily to cool its servers, while located in one of the driest states in the US. Complicating surveillance beyond the NSA, as also already imbricated with various social media companies, this article questions the emplacement and impact of corporate data centers more generally, and the changes they are causing to the landscape and local economies. I look at how water is an intriguing and politically relevant part of the surveillance infrastructure and how it has been constructed as the main tool for activism in this case, and how it may eventually help transform the public’s conceptualization of Big Data, as deeply material.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2053951715592429

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Aid MM, 2009, The Secret Sentry: The Untold History of the National Security Agency
  2. Gorman S (2013) Meltdowns hobble NSA Data Center. Wall Street Journal , October 7, sec. US. Available at: online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304441404579119490744478398?mod=wsj_nview_latest&mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304441404579119490744478398.html%3Fmod%3Dwsj_nview_latest (accessed 27 November 2014).
  3. MacLeod J (n.d.) Holding water in times of hydrophobia. (unpublished dissertation). Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University.
  4. Starosielski N, 2014, International Journal of Communication
  5. Tuana N, 2008, Material Feminisms, 188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogan, M.
Affiliations
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Hogan, Mél
Venue
Big Data & Society
Published
2015-07-13
Volume
2
Issue
2
ISSN
2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2181078401
Cited by
289
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
43.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
National Security Agency, mass surveillance, big data, data centers, water infrastructure, server cooling, Snowden revelations, privacy, landscape change, local economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review