Cited by 96Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

An Artificial Intelligence‐Based Chatbot for Prostate Cancer Education: Design and Patient Evaluation Study

Open access
Görtz, Magdalena, Baumgärtner, Kilian, Schmid, Tamara, Muschko, Marc, Woessner, Philipp, Gerlach, Axel, Byczkowski, Michael, Sültmann, Holger +2 more·2023·DIGITAL HEALTH

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in healthcare. AI-based chatbots can act as automated conversational agents, capable of promoting health and providing education at any time. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a user-friendly medical chatbot (prostate cancer communication assistant (PROSCA)) for provisioning patient information about early detection of prostate cancer (PC). Methods: The chatbot was developed to provide information on prostate diseases, diagnostic tests for PC detection, stages, and treatment options. Ten men aged 49 to 81 years with suspicion of PC were enrolled in this study. Nine of ten patients used the chatbot during the evaluation period and filled out the questionnaires on usage and usability, perceived benefits, and potential for improvement. Results: The chatbot was straightforward to use, with 78% of users not needing any assistance during usage. In total, 89% of the chatbot users in the study experienced a clear to moderate increase in knowledge about PC through the chatbot. All study participants who tested the chatbot would like to re-use a medical chatbot in the future and support the use of chatbots in the clinical routine. Conclusions: Through the introduction of the chatbot PROSCA, we created and evaluated an innovative evidence-based health information tool in the field of PC, allowing targeted support for doctor–patient communication and offering great potential in raising awareness, patient education, and support. Our study revealed that a medical chatbot in the field of early PC detection is readily accepted and benefits patients as an additional informative tool.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20552076231173304

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Hesse BW Greenberg AJ Peterson EB, et al. The health information national trends survey (HINTS): A resource for consumer engagement and health communication research. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 240: 330– 346. 28972526
  2. [19]Kandasamy S Khalid AF Majid U, et al. Prostate cancer patient perspectives on the use of information in treatment decision-making: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2017; 17: 1– 32. PMC5451209 28572868

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Görtz, M., Baumgärtner, K., Schmid, T., Muschko, M., Woessner, P., Gerlach, A., Byczkowski, M., Sültmann, H., Duensing, S., & Hohenfellner, M.
Affiliations
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Germany) (DE)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Görtz, Magdalena
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Published
2023-01
Volume
9
Pages
20552076231173304-20552076231173304
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4368275176
Cited by
96
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 15
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Dieter Morszeck Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
healthcare chatbots, prostate cancer, patient education, early detection, chatbots, health information, usability, patient knowledge, physician-patient communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review