Cited by 85Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in Service InteractionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Healthcare ex Machina: Are conversational agents ready for prime time in oncology?

Open access
Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel, Chaix, Benjamin, Nectoux, Pierre, Pienkowski, Arthur, Guillemasé, Arthur, Brouard, Benoît·2019·Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology

Abstract

Chatbots, also known as conversational agents or digital assistants, are artificial intelligence-driven software programs designed to interact with people in a conversational manner. They are often used for user-friendly customer-service triaging. In healthcare, chatbots can create bidirectional information exchange with patients, which could be leveraged for follow-up, screening, treatment adherence or data-collection. They can be deployed over various modalities, such as text-based services (text messaging, mobile applications, chat rooms) on any website or mobile applications, or audio services, such as Siri, Alexa, Cortana or Google Assistant. Potential applications are very promising, particularly in the field of oncology. In this review, we discuss the available publications and applications and the ongoing trials in that setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.04.002

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bibault, J.-E., Chaix, B., Nectoux, P., Pienkowski, A., Guillemasé, A., & Brouard, B.
Affiliations
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Hôpital Gui de Chauliac (FR)
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
Corresponding author
Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel
Venue
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
16
Pages
55-59
ISSN
2405-6308 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2931716593
Cited by
84
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
chatbots, oncology, artificial intelligence in healthcare, patient follow-up, cancer screening, medication adherence, virtual assistants, voice assistants, mobile health apps, clinical trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review