The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nursing students' professional identity development: An integrative review
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this integrative review was to identify and synthesize current evidence of factors that influence the professional identity development of nursing students in nursing educational programs. Cinahl (EBSCO), Medline, ERIC, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched. Three different appraisal tools and the PRISMA checklist were used. The data from both quantitative and qualitative studies (19 primary studies) were analyzed by applying qualitative content analysis. The analysis revealed two main themes: a caring practice–academic partnership and support in the learning environment. The following seven sub-categories were identified: clinical supervisors, ethical competence, preparation, self-confidence, predictability and safety, structure and cooperation, reflective space and safety. Our findings indicate that clinical supervisors play a central role as role models for nursing students. The main themes with sub-themes are critical in the professional identity development of nursing students in nursing educational programs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Vabo et al.'s (2022) integrative review of 19 studies confirmed that belonging, recognition by supervisors, and opportunities for reflective participation in clinical communities are the central determinants of identity formation.”
From When the algorithm enters the classroom: A critical integrative review of large language models, nursing education structural gaps, and the reconstitution of professional identity (2026) · cites this paper as Vabo et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
The integrative review: updated methodology
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · Cited by 10,241
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Thinking Like a Nurse: A Research-Based Model of Clinical Judgment in Nursing
Tanner, C. A. (2006) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20060601-04 · Cited by 1,748
Noyes, J., Booth, A., Moore, G., Flemming, K., Tunçalp, Ö., & Shakibazadeh, E. (2019) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893 · Cited by 497
Professional identity: values embedded in meaningful nursing practice
Fagermoen, M. S. (1997) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025434.x · Cited by 359
A systematic review of mentoring nursing students in clinical placements
Jokelainen, M., Turunen, H. E., Tossavainen, K., Jamookeeah, D., & Coco, K. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03571.x · Cited by 262
Stress, coping and satisfaction in nursing students
Gibbons, C., Dempster, M., & Moutray, M. (2010) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05495.x · Cited by 259
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Parandeh A, 2015, Glob J Health Sci, 7, 284
- Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software , www.covidence.org (2021, accessed 12 April 2021).
- Donmez RO, 2016, PaK J Med Sci, 32, 988
- Vygotsky LS, 1978, The development of higher psychological processes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gilvari, T., Babamohamadi, H., & Paknazar, F. (2022) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-022-01050-6 · Cited by 46
AI Image-Generation as a Teaching Strategy in Nursing Education
Reed, J., Alterio, B., Coblenz, H., O'Lear, T., & Metz, T. (2023) · Journal of Interactive Learning Research · doi:10.70725/729255gdiorw · Cited by 38
Löfgren, U., Wälivaara, B.-M., Strömbäck, U., & Lindberg, B. (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103747 · Cited by 35
Lin, S., Chen, S., Tu, Q., Xu, X., Xie, S., Yang, B., Zhang, Q., & Chen, L. (2023) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106087 · Cited by 29
A vulnerable journey towards professional empathy and moral courage
Heggestad, A. K. T., Konow-Lund, A.-S., Christiansen, B., & Nortvedt, P. (2022) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330221074013 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Vabo, G., Slettebø, Å., & Fossum, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Agder (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Vabo, Grete
- Venue
- Nordic Journal of Nursing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-08-13
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 62-75
- ISSN
- 0107-4083 (ISSN-L)
- 2057-1585
- 2057-1593
- OpenAlex
- W3194934004
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nordic journal of nursing research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- professional identity formation, nursing students, nursing education, clinical supervisors, role models, learning environment, ethical competence, self-confidence, reflective practice, clinical preparation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
