Cited by 53LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Couple-level minority stress and mental health among people in same-sex relationships: extending minority stress theory

Open access
LeBlanc, Allen J., Frost, David M.·2020·Society and Mental Health

Abstract

We simultaneously examined the effects of individual- and couple-level minority stressors on mental health among people in same-sex relationships. Individual-level minority stressors emerge from the stigmatization of sexual minority individuals; couple-level minority stressors emerge from the stigmatization of same-sex relationships. Dyadic data from 100 same-sex couples from across the United States were analyzed with actor–partner interdependence models. Couple-level stigma was uniquely associated with nonspecific psychological distress, depressive symptomatology, and problematic drinking, net the effects of individual-level stigma and relevant sociodemographic controls. Analyses also show that couple-level minority stress played unique roles in critical stress processes of minority stress proliferation: minority stress expansion and minority stress contagion. The inclusion of couple-level stress constructs represents a useful extension of minority stress theory, enriching our capacity to deepen understandings of minority stress experience and its application in the study of well-being and health inequalities faced by vulnerable populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2156869319884724

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minority stress experienced at the couple-level predicted mental health outcomes above and beyond individual-level minority stress experienced by each partner as individuals.

    “Further, minority stress experienced at the couple-level predicted mental health outcomes above and beyond individual-level minority stress experienced by each partner as individuals [24].”
  • LeBlanc and Frost showed that couple-level minority stress was associated with multiple mental health outcomes through minority stress expansion and minority stress contagion between partners in same-sex couples.

    “For example, LeBlanc and Frost [24] showed that couple-level minority stress was associated with multiple mental health outcomes through minority stress expansion and minority stress contagion between partners in same-sex couples.”
  • An important expansion to understanding how stress proliferates in dyadic relationships has developed in the application of minority stress to the study of couples.

    “While stress has traditionally been studied as an individual variable, an important expansion to understanding how stress proliferates in dyadic relationships has developed in the application of minority stress to the study of couples [24,25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]17. Kashy, Deborah A. and David A. Kenny. 2000. "The Analysis of Data from Dyads and Groups." In H.T. Reis & C.M. Judd (Eds.). Handbook of Research Methods in Social Psychology (pp. 451-78). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. [18]18. Kenny, David A. 1996. "Models of Nonindependence in Dyadic Research." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13:279-294.
  3. [42]42. Smith, Shardé McNeil and Antoinette M. Landor. 2018. "Toward a Better Understanding of African American Families: Development of the Sociocultural Family Stress Model." Journal of Family Theory & Review 10:434-50. DOI: 10.1111?jftr.12260

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeBlanc, A. J., & Frost, D. M.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
LeBlanc, Allen J.
Venue
Society and Mental Health
Published
2019-11-13
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
276-290
ISSN
  • 2156-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-8731
OpenAlex
W2983537378
Cited by
53
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Society and Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 HD070357)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
minority stress, same-sex couples, sexual minority mental health, depressive symptoms, psychological distress, problematic drinking, actor-partner interdependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review