Milwaukee’s Disregarded Population: Out of Sight; Out of Mind
Open accessAbstract
The research was a partial replication of Devah Pager’s study of the effect of a criminal record on employment opportunities in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin labor market. A quantitative and qualitative method was utilized to examine the effects of a criminal record, race, and the relationship between employers’ willingness to hire ex-offenders and their actual hiring of ex-offenders. An experimental audit was conducted by two testers (one Black male and one White male) to audit 30 employers. The results supported Pager’s findings. There was a dramatic negative effect for the Black male tester. Three themes emerged from the testers’ diaries and debriefings: (a) the application process was influenced in the favor of the White male by a “gatekeeper,” (b) racism was evident, and (c) an emotional effect was noted on both testers. Finally, during a telephone survey of the same employers, they indicated a willingness to hire both ex-offenders regardless of their race, yet the audit revealed the opposite.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is an intensifying interaction of race and criminal background: callback rates among Black respondents with criminal backgrounds were particularly low.
“Pager (2003), Pager et al. (2009), and Wells (2013) also find an intensifying interaction of race and criminal background: Callback rates among Black respondents with criminal backgrounds were particularly low.”
From Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments (2021) · cites this paper as Wells (2013)
Cites
Pager, D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374403 · Cited by 2,840 · see citing works
Ethnic Discrimination in Germany’s Labour Market: A Field Experiment
Kaas, L., & Manger, C. (2012) · German Economic Review · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00538.x · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Racial-ethnic biases, time pressure, and medical decisions
Stepanikova, I. (2012) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146512445807 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments
Quillian, L., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090420-035144 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wells, L.
- Affiliations
- Olive Branch, MS, USA
- Corresponding author
- Wells, Lenard
- Venue
- Sage Open
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125378741
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Keywords
- criminal records, employment discrimination, ex-offenders, racial discrimination, hiring practices, labor market, Milwaukee, racial bias in hiring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review