Norms for Familiarity, Concreteness, Valence, Arousal, Wordlikeness, and Recall Accuracy for Swahili–Portuguese Word Pairs
Open accessAbstract
Normative studies are common in cognitive psychology because they allow us to estimate with more precision the attributes of the stimuli used in empirical studies. The studies reported here had four aims. The first three aims were to obtain estimates for (a) familiarity, concreteness, valence, and arousal for a single set of words in Brazilian Portuguese; (b) wordlikeness (similarity to Portuguese) of a set of foreign words (Swahili); and (c) recall accuracy of Swahili–Portuguese word pairs in a multitrial learning task. The fourth aim was to investigate if any of the assessed measures predicts recall accuracy. One-hundred twenty-eight participants took part in one of the three studies. In Studies 1a and 1b, participants judged 80 Portuguese words for familiarity, concreteness, valence, and arousal and 80 corresponding Swahili words for wordlikeness; in Study 2, participants carried out three study–test cycles of a set of Swahili–Portuguese word pairs. Overall, word-attribute estimates were reliable ( rs = .94–.98) and participants’ responses had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .84–.98). Moreover, the relative difficulty of word pairs was retained across trials ( rs = .65–.88). Although different variables correlated with recall accuracy at different time points, multiple regressions indicate that none of the word-attribute variables predicted recall accuracy across trials. These norms may prove fruitful not only for Brazilian human memory researchers but also for international research teams, as it will enable the development of more controlled cross-cultural studies in this field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retrieval-based learning has been shown to be effective in language-impaired populations compared to repetitive study.
“Furthermore, as well as healthy populations, RBL has also been shown to be effective in language-impaired populations, compared to repetitive study (de Lima et al., 2021)”
From Does difficulty moderate learning? A comparative analysis of the desirable difficulties framework and cognitive load theory (2025) · cites this paper as de Lima et al., 2021
Cites
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1994) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658219408258951 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Normative data for Chinese-English paired associates
Cho, K. W., Tse, C.-S., & Chan, Y.-L. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01240-2 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pyke, W., Lunau, J., & Javadi, A.-H. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241308143 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This type of normative study, among others (de Lima & Buratto, 2021; Grimaldi et al., 2010; Nelson & Dunlosky, 1994; Pyke et al., 2023), allows future research to utilise individual items differently.”
- Authors
- Lima, M. F. R. D., & Buratto, L. G.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Lima, Marcos Felipe Rodrigues de
- Venue
- Sage Open
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123307080
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- word familiarity, word concreteness, word valence, word arousal, recall accuracy, foreign words, reference values, Brazilian Portuguese
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review