Cited by 12Workplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesSchool Health and Nursing Education

Manager Support for Wellness Champions: A Case Study for Consideration and Practice Implications

Mitchell, Leah, Amaya, Megan, Battista, Lauren, Melnyk, Bernadette, Andridge, Rebecca, Kaye, Gail·2021·Workplace Health & Safety

Abstract

Background Wellness champion networks are deemed an important component to workplace wellness programs. By encouraging colleagues to engage in healthy behaviors, champions can help improve employee health and well-being outcomes, while reducing healthcare costs and increasing productivity. However, little evidence exists regarding factors that impact the effectiveness of a wellness champion. This study examined the relationship between employee engagement in a workplace wellness champion program and the direct manager's support of the wellness champion role. Methods A descriptive study was conducted with a 15-item cross-sectional survey that was developed and disseminated to 470 wellness champions at a large academic institution. Survey questions addressed manager/supervisor support for the wellness champion, manager/supervisor support for faculty and staff direct reports participating in wellness activities, and demographic questions. Findings One hundred and ninety-nine (42%) wellness champions responded to the survey and responded to at least half of the questions. Wellness champions who reported a high level of manager support for their role were more likely to have high levels of engagement in communicating wellness initiatives ( p = .0004), motivating and encouraging colleagues ( p p = .04). Conclusion/application to practice Findings suggested that support wellness champions received from direct managers was a key determinant to their level of engagement in efforts to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2165079920952759

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nurses with greater fatigue report stronger negative emotions, including depression, anxiety, and stress.

    “Those nurses who feel higher levels of fatigue likewise experience more intense negative emotions such as depression, anxiety, and stress (Mitchell et al., 2021).”

    From Mental fatigue and negative emotion among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as Mitchell et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, L., Amaya, M., Battista, L., Melnyk, B., Andridge, R., & Kaye, G.
Affiliations
  • Huntington Bank
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Amaya, Megan
Venue
Workplace Health & Safety
Published
2020-11-11
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
100-108
ISSN
  • 2165-0799 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-0969
OpenAlex
W3103170096
Cited by
10
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Workplace Health & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
workplace health, manager support, employee engagement, employee health and well-being, workplace health promotion, supervisor support, employee motivation, academic institutions
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Universities, Organizational Culture, Occupational Health, Workplace, Organizational Case Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review