Cited by 8Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

The association between mindfulness and social media addiction among nurses: A cross-sectional study

Open access
Kang, Chunliang, Wang, Huan, Li, Jinfang, Zhang, Qiuxiang, Xie, Wenzhao·2025·Workplace Health & Safety

Abstract

Background: With the increasing use of social media, social media addiction (SMA) has become a pressing issue and is associated with multiple negative outcomes. Lack of mindfulness has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of SMA, yet such an association has never been explored among nurses in China. Methods From December 4, 2022 to March 14, 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 29 hospitals in Hunan Province, China. A total of 1,141 nurses were recruited and completed the online questionnaires. Mindfulness and SMA were assessed by the Mindful Awareness Attention Scale (MAAS) and Social Networking Service Addiction Scale (SNSAS), respectively. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to explore the association between mindfulness and SMA, and other influencing factors of SMA. Results The nurses had an average score of 68.02 ± 11.86 for mindfulness and 46.15 ± 15.09 for SMA. The results of linear regression analysis showed that lower levels of mindfulness (β = –0.06, p < .001), shorter working years (β = –0.21, p = .014), and experiencing more frequent workplace violence (β = 0.21, p =.007) were associated with an increased risk of SMA. Conclusions/Application to Practice Our study shows a generally moderate level of SMA among nurses in Hunan Province, which was influenced by mindfulness, working years, and workplace violence. Mindfulness-based interventions may be effective interventions to alleviate nurses’ SMA. Special attention should also be paid to nurses with shorter working years and those who experienced workplace violence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/21650799241282000

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. bph077 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, C., Wang, H., Li, J., Zhang, Q., & Xie, W.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Third Xiangya Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Qiuxiang
  • Xie, Wenzhao
Venue
Workplace Health & Safety
Published
2025-02-19
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
150-157
ISSN
  • 2165-0799 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-0969
OpenAlex
W4407747264
Cited by
8
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Workplace Health & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2021JJ70140)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
mindfulness, social media addiction, nurses, workplace violence, work experience, mindfulness-based interventions, occupational health
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Surveys and Questionnaires, Behavior, Addictive, Social Media, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review