The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to Computational Psychiatry: Clustering and Classification
Abstract
Psychiatric research is in crisis. We highlight efforts to overcome current challenges by focusing on the emerging field of computational psychiatry, which might enable the field to move from a symptom-based description of mental illness to descriptors based on objective computational multidimensional functional variables. We survey recent efforts toward this goal and describe a set of methods that together form a toolbox to aid this research program. We identify four levels in computational psychiatry: (a) behavioral tasks that index various psychological processes, (b) computational models that identify the generative psychological processes, (c) parameter-estimation methods concerned with quantitatively fitting these models to subject behavior by focusing on hierarchical Bayesian estimation as a rich framework with many desirable properties, and (d) machine-learning clustering methods that identify clinically significant conditions and subgroups of individuals. As a proof of principle, we apply these methods to two different data sets. Finally, we highlight challenges for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 · Cited by 3,059
An introduction to MCMC for machine learning.
Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1020281327116 · Cited by 2,451
A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning
Montague, P., Dayan, P., & Sejnowski, T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-05-01936.1996 · Cited by 2,066
Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067 · Cited by 1,478
Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions
Hallett, P. E. (1978) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90218-3 · Cited by 1,262
Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia Is the Core of the Disorder
Elvevag, B., & Goldberg, T. E. (2000) · Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology · doi:10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v14.i1.10 · Cited by 835 · cited 1×
“…the symptomatology of SZ as structured in terms of positive symptoms, such as psychosis; negative symptoms, such as anhedonia, which refers to the inability to experience pleasure from activities usually found enjoyable, such as social interaction; and cognitive deficits (Elvevåg & Goldberg, 2000).”
BackgroundTheta lingua franca: A common mid‐frontal substrate for action monitoring processes
Cavanagh, J. F., Zambrano‐Vazquez, L., & Allen, J. J. B. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x · Cited by 651
Cited by
Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging
Woo, C.-W., Chang, L. J., Lindquist, M. A., & Wager, T. D. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4478 · Cited by 1,056
Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications
Huys, Q. J. M., Maia, T. V., & Frank, M. J. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4238 · Cited by 1,002
Self-citationA high-resolution probabilistic in vivo atlas of human subcortical brain nuclei
Pauli, W. M., Nili, A. N., & Tyszka, J. M. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.63 · Cited by 517
Okon-Singer, H., Hendler, T., Pessoa, L., & Shackman, A. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00058 · Cited by 371
Reinforcement learning in depression: a review of computational research
Chen, C., Takahashi, T., Nakagawa, S., Inoue, T., & Kusumi, I. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.005 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiecki, T. V., Poland, J., & Frank, M. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-03-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 378-399
- ISSN
- 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-7034
- OpenAlex
- W2134387421
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to Computational Psychiatry: Clustering and Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2167702614565359
- The paper
- Wiecki, T. V., Poland, J., & Frank, M. J. (2015). Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to Computational Psychiatry: Clustering and Classification. Clinical Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614565359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
