Cited by 1,262Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions

Hallett, P.E.·1978·Vision Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90218-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallett, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Hallett, P.E.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-01
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
1279-1296
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136760581
Cited by
1,262
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 54
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
saccades, antisaccade task, saccade latency, foveation, oculomotor control
MeSH terms
Adult, Eye Movements, Feedback, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Fovea Centralis, Humans, Male, Motion Perception, Saccades

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review