Cited by 14Burn Injury Management and OutcomesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeWound Healing and Treatments

Inpatient silver sulphadiazine versus outpatient nanocrystalline silver models of care for pediatric scald burns: a value analysis.

Open access
Malic, Claudia, Verchere, Cynthia, Arneja, Jugpal S·2014·Plastic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Scalds represent the most frequent pediatric burn injury. Inpatient nonsurgical wound management of small or medium-size burns (<20% total body surface area) represents a significant proportion of the cost of care, with nanocrystalline silver (NCS) and silver sulphadiazine (SSD) among the most commonly used dressings. Although several articles have described healing outcomes using these dressings, there are few concurrent economic analyses. To analyze overall health care value (outcomes/cost) in burns not requiring surgery, the authors compared management of scald burns with NCS versus SSD from both a quality perspective and using bottom-up microcosting to determine which dressing option optimizes health care value. METHODS: A value analysis was performed. Published studies investigating NCS and/or SSD in the treatment of pediatric burns over the past 25 years were analyzed. Healing time, hospital duration and frequency of dressings were chosen as quality metrics. A bottom-up microcosting analysis was performed to estimate costs associated with the two dressing options. RESULTS: Over the 25-year period, 356 studies investigated the use of SSD in burns, while 55 studies evaluated the use of NCS. Mean age and burn size were equivalent. Mean time to healing was 14.9 days for NCS and 17.2 days for SSD. The mean duration of hospital stay was 14.9 days for SSD and 5.9 days for NCS. Dressings were performed twice per week for NCS, and once or twice per day for SSD. The mean total cost per patient to the health care system was estimated to be $61,140 for SSD and $17,220 for NCS. CONCLUSION: Published outcomes of healing time are equivalent or slightly better using NCS over SSD for pediatric scalds. The financial model illustrated a potential significant cost saving with NCS, primarily as a result of an outpatient model of care. Overall health care value is optimized using NCS for pediatric scalds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/229255031402200209

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The operative records were reviewed to determine skin-to-skin surgical and anesthesia time; these data were extrapolated to determine a case cost using previously defined bottom-up microcosting results for our institution.

    “The operative records were reviewed to determine skin-to-skin surgical and anesthesia time; these data were extrapolated to determine a case cost, using previously defined bottom-up microcosting results for our institution.13”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malic, C., Verchere, C., & Arneja, J. S.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Arneja, Jugpal S
Venue
Plastic Surgery
Published
2014-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
99-102
ISSN
  • 1195-2199 (ISSN-L)
  • 2292-5503
  • 2292-5511
OpenAlex
W2403632547
Cited by
14
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
silver sulfadiazine, nanocrystalline silver, burn wound dressing, micro-costing, health care value, cost reduction, healing time, length of hospital stay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review