Cited by 37Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended LearningTeam Dynamics and Performance

The cohesion of small groups in technology-mediated learning environments: A systematic literature review

Open access
Zamecnik, Andrew, Villa-Torrano, Cristina, Kovanović, Vitomir, Grossmann, Georg, Joksimović, Srećko, Dimitriadis, Yannis, Pardo, Abelardo·2022·Educational Research Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100427

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zamecnik, A., Villa-Torrano, C., Kovanović, V., Grossmann, G., Joksimović, S., Dimitriadis, Y., & Pardo, A.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
Corresponding author
Zamecnik, Andrew
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
35
Pages
100427
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200220700
Cited by
37
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (acceptedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
group cohesion, small groups, technology-mediated learning environments, cooperative learning, computer-supported collaborative learning, cohesion measurement, unobtrusive measurement, longitudinal study, group performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review