The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More than Prejudice: Restatement, Reflections, and New Directions in Critical Race Theory
Abstract
Racism has always been “more than prejudice,” but mainstream social analysts have mostly framed race matters as organized by the logic of prejudice. In this paper, I do four things. First, I restate my criticism of the dominant approach to race matters and emphasize the need to ground our racial analysis materially, that is, understanding that racism is systemic and rooted in differences in power between the races. Second, I reflect critically on my own theorization on race (the racialized social system approach) and acknowledge that I should have explained better the role of culture and ideology in the making and remaking of race. Third, I describe some of the work I have done since this early work. Fourth, I advance several new directions for research and theory in the field of race stratification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682
Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1023/a:1007068714468 · Cited by 3,139
Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Interpretation
Bonilla-Silva, E. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657316 · Cited by 2,760
Self-citationWhite Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9781685850272 · Cited by 897
Self-citation
Cited by
Bonilla-Silva, E., & Peoples, C. E. (2022) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642211066047 · Cited by 95
Self-citationAdvancing a sociology of ignorance in the study of racism and racial non‐knowing
Mueller, J. C. (2018) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12600 · Cited by 68
Hughey, M. W. (2015) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649214557334 · Cited by 22
Judges’ Perceptions of Systemic Racism in the Criminal Justice System
Holbrook, M. A., Dunbar, A., & Miller, M. K. (2025) · Race and Justice · doi:10.1177/21533687221087388 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonilla-Silva, E.
- Venue
- Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-87
- ISSN
- 2332-6492 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-6506
- OpenAlex
- W2341579430
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 77.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More than Prejudice: Restatement, Reflections, and New Directions in Critical Race Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2332649214557042
- The paper
- Bonilla-Silva, E. (2015). More than Prejudice: Restatement, Reflections, and New Directions in Critical Race Theory. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214557042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.