Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,503

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

Morgan, David L.·2007·Journal of Mixed Methods Research
DOI 10.1177/2345678906292462
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines several methodological issues associated with combining qualitative and quantitative methods by comparing the increasing interest in this topic with the earlier renewal of interest in qualitative research during the 1980s. The first section argues for the value of Kuhn’s concept of paradigm shifts as a tool for examining changes in research fields such as social science research methodology. The next two sections consider the initial rise of the “metaphysical paradigm” that justified the renewed interest in qualitative research and the subsequent problems that have encouraged efforts to replace that paradigm. The final section of the paper advocates a “pragmatic approach” as a new guiding paradigm in social science research methods, both as a basis for supporting work that combines qualitative and quantitative methods and as a way to redirect our attention to methodological rather than metaphysical concerns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2345678906292462

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Babbie, E. (1992). The practice of social research (6th ed.). Belmont, NJ: Wadsworth.
  2. Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Belmont, NJ: Wadsworth.
  3. Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, NJ: Wadsworth.
  4. Collins, H. & Pinch, T. (1998). The golem: What you should know about science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Guttman, M. & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  6. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  7. Giere, R. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  10. 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1097/00006199-200601000-00006 · DOI
  12. Hess, D. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
  13. 10.1177/1525822X05282260 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Peterson, J. & Pinch, T. (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kuhn, T. (1970). Postscript—1969. In T. Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., pp. 174-210). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Kuhn, T. (1974). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  17. Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI · Paper page
  18. (Original work published 1962) Kuhn, T. (2000). The road since structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  19. Labinger, J. & Collins, H. (Eds.). (2001). The one culture: A conversation about science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  20. Lincoln, Y. (1990). The making of a constructivist: A remembrance of transformations past. In E. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 67-87). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  21. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in educational research (pp. 89-115). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  23. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of paradigms. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Maxcy, S. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakorri & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 51-90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  26. Mills, C. (1969). Sociology and pragmatism: The higher learning in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
  27. 10.1177/104973239800800307 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Morgan, D. (2006). Connected contributions as a motivation combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In L. Curry, R. Shield, & T. Wetle (Eds.), Applying qualitative and mixed methods in aging and public health research. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
  29. Morgan, D. (in press). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  30. Neal, M., Hammer, L. & Morgan, D. (2006). Using mixed methods in research related to work and family. In M. Pitt-Cassouphes, E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multidisciplinary perspectives and approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  31. Newman, M. (1992). Prevailing paradigms in nursing. Nursing Outlook, 10(1), 10-13, 32-32. · DOI
  32. Patton, M. (1975). Alternative evaluation research paradigm. Grand Forks: University of North Dakota Press.
  33. Patton, M. (1988). Paradigms and pragmatism. In D. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in educational research (pp. 116-137). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  34. Patton, M. (1997). Utilization focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  35. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative methods and evaluation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  36. Philips D. (1990). Positivistic science: Myths and realities. In E. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 31-45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  37. Platt, J. (1996). A history of sociological research methods in America, 1920-1960. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Rescher, N. (2000). Realistic pragmatism: An introduction to pragmatic philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  39. Rossman, G. & Rallis, S. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  40. Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1177/089124189017004001 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0149-7189(94)00050-8 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0149-7189(94)00048-3 · DOI
  44. 10.1177/030631277400400102 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Smith J. & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Leadership, 15(12), 4-12. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakorri & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  47. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  48. Zammito, J. (2004). A nice derangement of epistemes: Post-positivism in the study of science from Quine to Latour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

See all 2,503

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, D. L.
Venue
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2007-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
48-76
ISSN
  • 1558-6898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-6901
DOI
10.1177/2345678906292462
OpenAlex
W2169805800
Cited by
2,503
References
4
FWCI
256.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.