Cited by 30Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationInnovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical Education

Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Insights From an Educational Forum

Open access
Barbour, Andrew B, Frush, Jennifer M, Gatta, Luke A, McManigle, William C, Keah, Niobra M, Bejarano-Pineda, Lorena, Guerrero, Evan M·2019·Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

Abstract

Discussions surrounding the future of artificial intelligenc (AI) in healthcare often cause consternation among healthcare professionals. These feelings may stem from a lack of formal education on AI and how to be a leader of AI implementation in medical systems. To address this, our academic medical center hosted an educational summit exploring how to become a leader of AI in healthcare. This article presents three lessons learned from hosting this summit, thus providing guidance for developing medical curriculum on the topic of AI in healthcare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2382120519889348

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Research and Markets. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Market by Product (Hardware, Software, Services), Technology (Machine Learning, Context-Aware Computing, NLP), Application (Drug Discovery, Precision Medicine), End User, and Geography—Global Forecast to 2025. Dublin: Research and Markets; 2019: 1- 178.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbour, A. B., Frush, J. M., Gatta, L. A., McManigle, W. C., Keah, N. M., Bejarano-Pineda, L., & Guerrero, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Corresponding author
Barbour, Andrew B
Venue
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Published
2019-01
Volume
6
Pages
2382120519889348-2382120519889348
ISSN
2382-1205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004047251
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, artificial intelligence in education, medical curriculum development, AI leadership, lessons learned, academic medical centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review