Cited by 1Gender Studies and Social IssuesUrban and Rural Development ChallengesChild Nutrition and Water Access

Understanding women’s access to sanitation: A study of the slums in Delhi.

Singh, Kislay Kumar, Mishra, Pragati·2019·Journal of Social Inclusion Studies

Abstract

Sanitation is an important basic right for a dignified living. About 130 million households lack toilets; even more than 72 per cent of the rural population defecate in open areas. The dearth of proper sanitation facilities is visible throughout the Indian sub-continent. Even the capital has failed to distance from this crisis. Lack of sanitation facilities causes pollution, health issues and, above all, security problems, especially for women. Women ought to go for open defecation that makes them more vulnerable towards crime. Rape, sexual assault or eve-teasing often take place in the silence of the night, and the screams of pain never come out. This paper highlights the poor sanitation facilities in slums and jhuggi jhopadi clusters in Delhi and its effect on people living there. A gender analysis framework has been used to get a wider perspective on the problems arising due to the lack of sanitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2394481119893156

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Family members (often husbands, fathers, and in-laws) restricted water fetching and sanitation-related movements, most intensely for unmarried daughters and recently married and pregnant women, less intensely for women of lower castes and widows.

    “Research in India found that family members (often husbands, fathers, and in-laws) restricted water fetching and sanitation-related movements, most intensely for unmarried daughters [174,182,190] and recently married and pregnant women, [178, 182, 189] (less intensely for women of lower castes [135] and widows [174]).”
  • General and sexual harassment are more frequently observed/documented in sanitation than water research.

    “General harassment, including taunting, teasing, name calling, and throwing things at women or girls is more frequently observed in sanitation [138, 168, 174, 175, 181, 187, 190, 263] than water research [168,199] Sexual harassment, including verbal harassment, peeping, flashing, and male masturbation is also more frequently documented in sanitation [171-174, 189, 190, 214, 217, 226, 231, 233]”
  • Women who withheld food and water or suppressed urination and defecation when lacking access to safe, clean latrines reported experiencing urinary tract infections, headaches, stomach aches, constipation, diarrhea, and other illnesses.

    “Women who withheld food and water or suppressed urination and defecation when lacking access to safe, clean latrines reported experiencing urinary tract infections, headaches, stomach aches, constipation, diarrhea, and other illnesses [135, 168, 172-174, 184, 190, 214, 248].”
  • Social capital has facilitated sanitation access; women and girls have formed and maintained social connections when accessing sanitation locations, and sought social support to ensure privacy and safety and to protect reputations when urinating or defecating.

    “Social capital has facilitated sanitation access.Women and girls have formed and maintained social connections when accessing sanitation locations, [130, 182, 189] and sought social support to ensure privacy and safety and to protect reputations when urinating or defecating [173, 182, 184, 187-190, 223, 226].”
  • Inter-household sanitation-related conflicts were reported related to shared toilets, where women practice open defecation, and accessing sanitation facilities.

    “Inter-household sanitation-related conflicts were reported related to shared toilets, [187] where women practice open defecation, [189,190] and accessing sanitation facilities [175].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, K. K., & Mishra, P.
Affiliations
University of Delhi (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, Kislay Kumar
Venue
Journal of Social Inclusion Studies
Published
2019-12
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
200-209
ISSN
  • 2394-4811 (ISSN-L)
  • 2516-6123
OpenAlex
W3005093005
Cited by
1
References
7
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Inclusion Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
slums, open defecation, gender analysis, sexual violence, crimes against women, sanitation facilities, Delhi, urban poverty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review