Understanding women’s access to sanitation: A study of the slums in Delhi.
Abstract
Sanitation is an important basic right for a dignified living. About 130 million households lack toilets; even more than 72 per cent of the rural population defecate in open areas. The dearth of proper sanitation facilities is visible throughout the Indian sub-continent. Even the capital has failed to distance from this crisis. Lack of sanitation facilities causes pollution, health issues and, above all, security problems, especially for women. Women ought to go for open defecation that makes them more vulnerable towards crime. Rape, sexual assault or eve-teasing often take place in the silence of the night, and the screams of pain never come out. This paper highlights the poor sanitation facilities in slums and jhuggi jhopadi clusters in Delhi and its effect on people living there. A gender analysis framework has been used to get a wider perspective on the problems arising due to the lack of sanitation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Family members (often husbands, fathers, and in-laws) restricted water fetching and sanitation-related movements, most intensely for unmarried daughters and recently married and pregnant women, less intensely for women of lower castes and widows.
“Research in India found that family members (often husbands, fathers, and in-laws) restricted water fetching and sanitation-related movements, most intensely for unmarried daughters [174,182,190] and recently married and pregnant women, [178, 182, 189] (less intensely for women of lower castes [135] and widows [174]).”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [190]
General and sexual harassment are more frequently observed/documented in sanitation than water research.
“General harassment, including taunting, teasing, name calling, and throwing things at women or girls is more frequently observed in sanitation [138, 168, 174, 175, 181, 187, 190, 263] than water research [168,199] Sexual harassment, including verbal harassment, peeping, flashing, and male masturbation is also more frequently documented in sanitation [171-174, 189, 190, 214, 217, 226, 231, 233]”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [190]
Women who withheld food and water or suppressed urination and defecation when lacking access to safe, clean latrines reported experiencing urinary tract infections, headaches, stomach aches, constipation, diarrhea, and other illnesses.
“Women who withheld food and water or suppressed urination and defecation when lacking access to safe, clean latrines reported experiencing urinary tract infections, headaches, stomach aches, constipation, diarrhea, and other illnesses [135, 168, 172-174, 184, 190, 214, 248].”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [190]
Social capital has facilitated sanitation access; women and girls have formed and maintained social connections when accessing sanitation locations, and sought social support to ensure privacy and safety and to protect reputations when urinating or defecating.
“Social capital has facilitated sanitation access.Women and girls have formed and maintained social connections when accessing sanitation locations, [130, 182, 189] and sought social support to ensure privacy and safety and to protect reputations when urinating or defecating [173, 182, 184, 187-190, 223, 226].”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [190]
Inter-household sanitation-related conflicts were reported related to shared toilets, where women practice open defecation, and accessing sanitation facilities.
“Inter-household sanitation-related conflicts were reported related to shared toilets, [187] where women practice open defecation, [189,190] and accessing sanitation facilities [175].”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [190]
Cites
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617 · see citing works
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
(2023) · JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS · doi:10.58710/jia · Cited by 4,613 · see citing works
McCoy, A. W. (2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim210040093 · Cited by 3,756 · see citing works
A literature review of the non-health impacts of sanitation
Joanna Pearson, J. P., & Kate Mcphedran, K. M. (2008) · Waterlines · doi:10.3362/1756-3488.2008.005 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Rautanen, S.-L., Luonsi, A., Nygård, H., Vuorinen, H. S., & Rajala, R. (2010) · Environment and History · doi:10.3197/096734010x12699419057250 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Watery Sanitation and the Millennium Development Goals
Lenton, R. L., Lewis, K. D. C., & Wright, A. M. (2008) · Journal of international affairs · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Coombes, R. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c5027 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis
Caruso, B. A., Conrad, A., Patrick, M., Owens, A., Kviten, K., Zarella, O., Rogers, H., & Sinharoy, S. S. (2022) · PLOS Water · doi:10.1371/journal.pwat.0000026 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
- Authors
- Singh, K. K., & Mishra, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Delhi (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Kislay Kumar
- ORCID
- Singh, Kislay Kumar
- Venue
- Journal of Social Inclusion Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 200-209
- ISSN
- 2394-4811 (ISSN-L)
- 2516-6123
- OpenAlex
- W3005093005
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Inclusion Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Keywords
- slums, open defecation, gender analysis, sexual violence, crimes against women, sanitation facilities, Delhi, urban poverty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review