Cited by 60Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and stroke associated with treatment with GLP-1 or the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Stefanou, Maria-Ioanna, Theodorou, Aikaterini, Malhotra, Konark, Aguiar de Sousa, Diana, Katan, Mira, Palaiodimou, Lina, Katsanos, Aristeidis H, Koutroulou, Ioanna +6 more·2024·European Stroke Journal

Abstract

Introduction: Mounting evidence suggests that glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor-agonists (GLP-1 RAs) attenuate cardiovascular-risk in type-2 diabetes (T2DM). Tirzepatide is the first-in-class, dual glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide GIP/GLP-1 RA approved for T2DM. Patients and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to estimate: (i) the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); and (ii) incidence of stroke, fatal, and nonfatal stroke in T2DM-patients treated with GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs (vs placebo). Results: Thirteen RCTs (9 and 4 on GLP-1 RAs and tirzepatide, respectively) comprising 65,878 T2DM patients were included. Compared to placebo, GLP-1RAs or GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81–0.94; p < 0.01; I 2 = 37%), all-cause mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82–0.96; p < 0.01; I 2 = 21%) and cardiovascular-mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80–0.96; p < 0.01; I 2 = 14%), without differences between GLP-1 versus GIP/GLP-1 RAs. Additionally, GLP-1 RAs reduced the odds of stroke (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76–0.93; p < 0.01; I 2 = 0%) and nonfatal stroke (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76–0.94; p < 0.01; I 2 = 0%), whereas no association between fatal stroke and GLP-1RAs was uncovered (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.61–1.05; p = 0.105; I 2 = 0%). In secondary analyses, GLP-1 RAs prevented ischemic stroke (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61–0.91; p < 0.01; I 2 = 0%) and MACE-recurrence, but not hemorrhagic stroke (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.51–1.66; p = 0.792; I 2 = 0%). There was no association between GLP-1RAs or GIP/GLP-1 RAs and fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Discussion and conclusion: GLP-1 and GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduce cardiovascular-risk and mortality in T2DM. While there is solid evidence that GLP-1 RAs significantly attenuate the risk of ischemic stroke in T2DM, dedicated RCTs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of novel GIP/GLP-1 RAs for primary and secondary stroke prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/23969873241234238

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Madsbad S. Review of head-to-head comparisons of gluca- gon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Obes Metab 2016; 18: 317-332.
  2. Kielgast U, Holst JJ and Madsbad S. Treatment of type 1 diabetic patients with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GLP-1R agonists. Curr Diabetes Rev 2009; 5: 266-275.
  3. Gupta V. Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues: an overview. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2013; 17: 413-421.
  4. Marx N, Husain M, Lehrke M, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists for the reduction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Circulation 2022; 146: 1882- 1894.
  5. Gladstone DJ, Lindsay MP, Douketis J, et al.; Canadian Stroke Consortium. Canadian stroke best practice recom- mendations: secondary prevention of stroke update 2020. Can J Neurol Sci 2022; 49: 315-337.
  6. Nauck MA and D'Alessio DA. Tirzepatide, a dual GIP/ GLP-1 receptor co-agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabe- tes with unmatched effectiveness regrading glycaemic con- trol and body weight reduction. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2022; 21: 169.
  7. Samms RJ, Coghlan MP and Sloop KW. How may GIP enhance the therapeutic efficacy of glp-1? Trends Endocrinol Metab 2020; 31: 410-421.
  8. Kaplan AM and Vigna SR. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) binding sites in rat brain. Peptides 1994; 15: 297-302.
  9. Cho YK, La Lee Y and Jung CH. The cardiovascular effect of tirzepatide: a glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide dual agonist. J Lipid Atheroscler 2023; 12: 213-222.
  10. Malhotra K, Katsanos AH, Lambadiari V, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists in diabetes for stroke prevention: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 2020; 267: 2117-2122.
  11. Marsico F, Paolillo S, Gargiulo P, et al. Effects of gluca- gon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on major cardiovascu- lar events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without established cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 3346- 3358.
  12. Benn M, Emanuelsson F, Tybjærg-Hansen A, et al. Impact of high glucose levels and glucose lowering on risk of ischae- mic stroke: a Mendelian randomisation study and meta-anal- ysis. Diabetologia 2021; 64: 1492-1503.
  13. Goldenberg RM, Cheng AYY, Fitzpatrick T, et al. Benefits of GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide 1) receptor agonists for stroke reduction in type 2 diabetes: a call to action for neu- rologists. Stroke 2022; 53: 1813-1822.
  14. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA state- ment for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: e1-34.
  15. Marx N, McGuire DK, Perkovic V, et al. Composite pri- mary end points in cardiovascular outcomes trials involv- ing Type 2 diabetes patients: should unstable angina Be included in the primary end point? Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 1144-1151.
  16. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928.
  17. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d4002.
  18. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta- analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629-634.
  19. Cramond F, O'Mara-Eves A, Doran-Constant L, et al. The development and evaluation of an online application to assist in the extraction of data from graphs for use in systematic reviews. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3: 157.
  20. Gerstein H, Colhoun H, Dagenais G, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394: 121-130.
  21. Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M, et al. Oral sema- glutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 841-851.
  22. Gerstein HC, Sattar N, Rosenstock J, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with efpeglenatide in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 896-907.
  23. Holman RR, Bethel MA, Mentz RJ, et al. Effects of once- weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 dia- betes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1228-1239.
  24. Hernandez AF, Green JB, Janmohamed S, et al. Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double- blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 392: 1519-1529.
  25. Verma S, Poulter NR, Bhatt DL, et al. Effects of liraglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Circulation 2018; 138: 2884-2894.
  26. Rosenstock J, Wysham C, Frías JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 398: 143-155.
  27. Garvey WT, Frias JP, Jastreboff AM, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabe- tes (SURMOUNT-2): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 402: 613-626.
  28. Piccini S, Favacchio G, Panico C, et al. Time-dependent effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular benefits: a real-world study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2023; 22: 69.
  29. Scheen AJ. Dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists: new advances for treating type-2 diabetes. Ann Endocrinol 2023; 84: 316- 321.
  30. Strain WD, Frenkel O, James MA, et al. Effects of semaglu- tide on stroke subtypes in type 2 diabetes: post hoc analy- sis of the randomized SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6. Stroke 2022; 53: 2749-2757.
  31. Erbil D, Eren CY, Demirel C, et al. GLP-1's role in neuropro- tection: a systematic review. Brain Inj 2019; 33: 734-819.
  32. Seppa K, Toots M, Reimets R, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide has a neuroprotective effect on an aged rat model of wolfram syndrome. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 15742.
  33. Salcedo I, Tweedie D, Li Y, et al. Neuroprotective and neu- rotrophic actions of glucagon-like peptide-1: an emerging opportunity to treat neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular disorders. Br J Pharmacol 2012; 166: 1586-1599.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stefanou, M.-I., Theodorou, A., Malhotra, K., Aguiar de Sousa, D., Katan, M., Palaiodimou, L., Katsanos, A. H., Koutroulou, I., Lambadiari, V., Lemmens, R., Giannopoulos, S., Alexandrov, A. V., Siasos, G., & Tsivgoulis, G.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Allegheny Health Network (US)
  • Stroke Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central and Institute of Anatomy, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal 3
  • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 4
  • Population Health Research Institute (CA)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tsivgoulis, Georgios
Venue
European Stroke Journal
Published
2024-09-01
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
530-539
ISSN
  • 2396-9873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-9881
OpenAlex
W4392137095
Cited by
60
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 11
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Stroke Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, tirzepatide, GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, type 2 diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, cardiovascular safety, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular risk reduction, GLP-1 receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Receptor, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Tirzepatide, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stroke, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review