Cited by 104Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryDiabetes Treatment and ManagementCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Perioperative management of patients taking glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) multidisciplinary consensus statement

Open access
Oprea, Adriana D., Ostapenko, Laura J., Sweitzer, BobbieJean, Selzer, Angela, Irizarry-Alvarado, Joan M., Hurtado Andrade, Maria D., Mendez, Carlos E., Kelley, Kristen D. +7 more·2025·British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

The perioperative management of patients using glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists remains a topic of debate. While several multisociety statements have been published recently, the recommendations vary significantly in terms of medication management and preoperative fasting protocols for these patients. This document represents a multidisciplinary consensus statement led by the Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI). It provides updated recommendations based on a modified Delphi process and supported by a systematic review of the current literature. The recommendations address management of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists perioperatively, and preoperative fasting times for both solids and liquids. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023438624).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.001

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 166 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oprea, A. D., Ostapenko, L. J., Sweitzer, B., Selzer, A., Irizarry-Alvarado, J. M., Hurtado Andrade, M. D., Mendez, C. E., Kelley, K. D., Stewart, E., Fernandez Robles, C. R., Chadha, R. M., Camilleri, M., Mathur, R., Umpierrez, G. E., & Hepner, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • MaineHealth (US)
  • Inova Health System (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Oprea, Adriana D.
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-07
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
48-78
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410386406
Cited by
104
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 19
FWCI
86.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mayo Clinic
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, perioperative care, preoperative fasting, fasting duration, medication management, consensus recommendations, Delphi method
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Delphi Technique, Fasting, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Perioperative Care, Consensus, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review