Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Introduction: Accumulation by restoration and political ecologies of repair

Huff, Amber, Brock, Andrea·2023·Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space

Abstract

Accumulation by Restoration (AbR) represents a shift from a conservationist ‘mode of production’ emphasizing sustainability and preservation to a ‘growth economy of repair’ in which nature becomes valued not just for its use but also for its potential for repair or restoration. The ‘repair mode’ mobilizes the assumption, imagery and mythology of degradation juxtaposed with the promise of economic and ecological redemption. Through rationalization, restoration, re-creation and/or re-cultivation, it aims to generate new, better-disciplined, more legible, ‘substitutable’ natures to multiple accumulative ends. Bridging political ecology, critical agrarian studies and science and technology studies, contributions to this themed issue explore transformations associated with AbR at across scales and involving variegated alliances, discourses, technologies and institutional dynamics giving rise to ecologies of repair. We demonstrate how the dynamics and contradictions of the repair mode are mediated and enacted through the performative, spectacular and metrological rendering of ‘mitigation’, ‘equivalence’, ‘neutrality’ and ‘repair’ as instruments and object, simultaneous means and ends. These dynamics have given rise to new materialities and technologies of governance and new intensities and spatialities of resource control and accumulation, as what were consequences of growth have become strategic goals and the foundation of a new growth economy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/25148486231168393

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 101

  1. 10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.2307/j.ctt183pb6f · DOI
  3. Anker P, 2021, Imperial Ecology. Imperial Ecology
  4. Benoist L, 2020, Green is the New Brown: Ecology in the Metapolitics of the French far Right Today
  5. 10.3389/fcosc.2021.666910 · DOI
  6. 10.1108/S0161-723020180000033004 · DOI
  7. Bookchin M, 1987, Green Perspectives: Newsletter of the Green Program Project, 1987, 4
  8. 10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419 · DOI
  9. Brock A, 2019, Conserving Nature Power: An Exploration of Biodiversity Offsetting in Europe and Beyond
  10. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.018 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00760.x · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00763.x · DOI
  13. 10.1080/10455752.2012.674149 · DOI
  14. Caffentzis G, 2014, Community Development Journal, 49
  15. 10.1007/978-94-009-9109-5_8 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0308518X18796510 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00768.x · DOI
  18. 10.1080/08941920.2017.1284291 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/08941920.2017.1320176 · DOI
  20. 10.1191/0309132503ph428oa · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.013 · DOI
  22. 10.2458/jpe.4683 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00764.x · DOI
  24. 10.1177/194277861300600101 · DOI
  25. 10.2307/3985059 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/030913259201600401 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/147447409600300406 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0962-6298(96)00032-7 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/0263276415598629 · DOI
  30. De Angelis M, 2014, The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization, 280
  31. Debord G, 1967, Society of the Spectacle
  32. Devall B, 1985, Deep Ecology
  33. 10.1017/S0376892910000044 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/978-3-030-99646-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/2514848619874691 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Federici S, 2019, Radical Philosophy, 2, 55
  38. Fischer-Kowalski M, 2011, Decoupling: Natural Resource use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth
  39. 10.1353/arw.0.0095 · DOI
  40. 10.2307/j.ctv28vb1wq · DOI
  41. Guterres A, 2020, Secretary-General’s Address at Columbia University:“The State of the Planet”
  42. 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.31269/triplec.v16i2.1024 · DOI
  44. 10.1215/01636545-2010-017 · DOI
  45. 10.4324/9780203946848 · DOI
  46. 10.2139/ssrn.4058592 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/25148486211015056 · DOI
  48. Huff A, 2017, Antipode Interventions
  49. 10.5040/9781350040946.ch-003 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102195 · DOI
  51. Hui Y, 2020, E-Flux Journal, 114
  52. 10.11647/obp.0265.01 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/0308275X10372468 · DOI
  54. Igoe J, 2008, Nature Unbound. Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas
  55. IPCC, 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group14 I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  56. Jessop B, 2015, New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research
  57. 10.2307/j.ctt2005tk7.8 · DOI
  58. 10.1080/03066150.2011.607695 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/017084069101200205 · DOI
  60. 10.1080/1943815X.2012.742914 · DOI
  61. Kröger M, 2022, Extractivisms, Existences and Extinctions: Monoculture Plantations and Amazon Deforestation
  62. 10.3197/096734000129342361 · DOI
  63. Luxemburg R, 2016, The Accumulation of Capital: A Contribution to an Economic Explanation of Imperialism
  64. 10.1057/dev.2011.105 · DOI
  65. McCarthy J, 2004, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 35, 275
  66. Marx K, 1887, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. 1
  67. Meadows DH, 1972, The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Proyect on the Predicament of Mankind
  68. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.027 · DOI
  69. 10.1080/09644010008414511 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/jlca.12170 · DOI
  71. 10.1080/00201747308601682 · DOI
  72. 10.1080/21693293.2014.872456 · DOI
  73. Neumann RP, 1998, Imposing Wilderness: Struggles over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa
  74. 10.1177/0308518X18755748 · DOI
  75. 10.4324/9780203842249-9 · DOI
  76. 10.1111/cobi.12123 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00476.x · DOI
  78. 10.1068/d3304 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.11.003 · DOI
  80. 10.1038/461472a · DOI · Paper page
  81. Smith JK, 2021, The (Re) Emergence of Eco-Fascism: White-Nationalism, Sacrifice, and Proto-Fascism in the Circulation of Digital Rhetoric in the Ecological Far-Right
  82. Smith N, 2007, Socialist Register, 2007, 16
  83. 10.1177/25148486211045360 · DOI
  84. 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Sullivan S, 2009, Radical Anthropology, 3, 18
  86. 10.3898/NEWF.69.06.2010 · DOI
  87. 10.1177/194277861300600106 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00989.x · DOI
  89. Sullivan S, 2014, And Values. Manchester:
  90. 10.2458/v24i1.20802 · DOI
  91. Sullivan S, 2019, Valuing Development, Environment and Conservation: Creating Values that Matter, 101
  92. 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2963 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1177/0263276418757314 · DOI
  95. 10.4324/9781351104043-16 · DOI
  96. 10.1525/can.2000.15.3.327 · DOI
  97. 10.1515/9781400830596 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 2011, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication
  99. 10.1177/25148486221107221 · DOI
  100. Voskoboynik DM, 2021, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space
  101. 10.1017/9781108560962.003 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Huff, A., & Brock, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Development Studies, The University of Sussex, UK
  • The University of Sussex, UK
Venue
Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space
Published
2023-04-25
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
2113-2133
ISSN
  • 2514-8486
  • 2514-8494
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/I021620/1, ES/W009331/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review