Cited by 69Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionCOVID-19 and Mental Health

When it counts the most: trauma-informed care and the COVID-19 global pandemic.

Open access
Collin-Vézina, Delphine, Brend, Denise, Beeman, Irene·2020·Developmental Child Welfare

Abstract

CONTEXT: Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis suggests that children and youth are more likely to be subjected to maltreatment and exposure to family violence, while experiencing limited access to the usual services that support vulnerable families and provide targeted services to meet their needs. The current global pandemic itself can also be experienced as a traumatic event. Trauma-informed care draws attention to the potential impacts, from the individual to the global, that myriad traumatic experiences can illicit and proposes using these understandings as foundational to the development and implementation of policy and practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this opinion paper is to offer insights to guide practices and policies during this unprecedented global crisis through a discussion of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2014)’s six trauma-informed care principles: trustworthiness and transparency; safety; peer support; collaboration and mutuality; empowerment and choice; and cultural, historical and gender issues. FINDINGS: Specific recommendations based on these six principles and applied to the current situation are presented and discussed. These principles can serve both in the immediate crisis and as preventative measures against unforeseen future traumatic contexts. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 renews the imperative to maintain and strengthen trauma-informed practices and policies. We argue that never before has trauma-informed care been so important to promote the health and well-being of all and to protect our marginalized populations at greatest risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2516103220942530

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collin-Vézina, D., Brend, D., & Beeman, I.
Affiliations
  • Director of the Centre for Research on Children and Families, Director of the Canadian Consortium on Child & Youth Trauma, Nicolas Steinmetz and Gilles Julien Chair in Social Pediatrics in Community, Associate Professor, School of Social Work & Associate Member, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Developmental Child Welfare
Published
2020-08-04
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
172-179
ISSN
  • 2516-1032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2516-1040
OpenAlex
W3047508410
Cited by
69
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Developmental Child Welfare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
SSHRC Partnership Grant (895-2020-1016)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
trauma-informed care, COVID-19 pandemic, child abuse, family violence exposure, children and young people, safety, peer support, access to services, marginalized communities, child welfare policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review