Cited by 32Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes and associated disorders

The effects of diabetes self-management education on quality of life for persons with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Davidson, Patricia, LaManna, Jacqueline, Davis, Jean, Ojeda, Maria M., Hyer, Suzanne, Dickinson, Jane K., Todd, Andrew, Hammons, Tamara M. +8 more·2022·The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is well documented that chronic conditions, such as diabetes, impact quality of life (QoL). QoL assessment is essential when developing and evaluating diabetes self-management education support interventions. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence and gaps in the research and the impact of diabetes self-management education (DSME) on QoL outcomes in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: A systematic review of English language studies published between January 1, 2007, and March 31, 2020, was conducted using a modified Cochrane review method. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), participants had T1DM with or without caregivers, a DSME intervention alone or a component(s) of the ADCES7™ Self-Care Behaviors was described, and QoL was a primary or secondary outcome. A 3-tiered review process was utilized for selecting articles. Retained articles were assessed for risk of bias. RESULTS: Nineteen articles, reporting on 17 RCTs, met inclusion criteria, of which 7 studies reported QoL as the primary outcome and 10 as a secondary outcome. Seven studies detected significant impact of DMSE on QoL outcomes in either the participants or family caregivers, which varied in participant populations, selection of QoL tools (generic vs diabetes-specific), intervention type, intervention length, and type of interventionist. CONCLUSION: DSME has the potential to influence QoL outcomes in people with T1DM. Research using more standardized methods are needed to delineate impact on a broader range of factors that influence QoL for those living with T1DM across the life span and their caregivers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/26350106211070266

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [33]Self-management education workshops. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed December 20, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/interventions/self_manage.htm
  2. [48]Higgins JPT TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 6.2. Updated February, 2021. Cochrane; 2021: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook. PMC10284251 31643080
  3. [51]Covidence systematic review software [computer program]. Veritas Health Innovation; 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, P., LaManna, J., Davis, J., Ojeda, M. M., Hyer, S., Dickinson, J. K., Todd, A., Hammons, T. M., Mohammed Fahim, S., McDaniel, C. C., McKee, C. A., Clements, J. N., Yehl, K., Litchman, M. L., Blanchette, J. E., & Kavookjian, J.
Affiliations
  • West Chester University (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Walden University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Cincinnati VA Medical Center (US)
  • Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Spartanburg Regional Medical Center (US)
  • Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, Chicago, Illinois
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care
Published
2022-01-14
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
111-135
ISSN
  • 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 2635-0106
  • 2635-0114
OpenAlex
W4205934719
Cited by
32
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks (Walden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (TL1TR003106)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
diabetes self-management education, type 1 diabetes, quality of life, family caregivers, self-care behavior, diabetes self-management interventions
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review