Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,215

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE SPECIFICITY OF THE HISTOCHEMICAL METHOD FOR ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATAS

PADYKULA, HELEN A., HERMAN, EDITH·1955·Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

Abstract

Three categories of phosphatase activity toward adenosine triphosphate at pH 9.4 have been isolated histochemically: (1) phosphatase which requires -SH groups; (2) phosphatase which is inhibited by -SH groups; and (3) phosphatase which is relatively indifferent to -SH groups. This enzymatic activity was demonstrated in thin (5 µ), unfixed, frozen sections. True adenosine triphosphatase has been separated histochemically by virtue of its -SH dependence. It was demonstrated in cardiac and skeletal muscle fibers and in the mitochondria of the kidney tubules. The staining of these structures can be prevented by treatment with an -SH inhibitor, such as p-chloromercuribenzoate or salyrganic acid. Also their stainability can be restored by reversing the inhibition of the enzymes with -SH compounds, such as BAL or cysteine. There was no reaction of these particular structures when adenosine diphosphate or adenosine-5-phosphate was used, suggesting that under the conditions of this histochemical test only the terminal phosphate of adenosine triphosphate is removed. Phosphatase activity of the smooth muscle of the intestinal muscularis toward adenosine triphosphate differed from that of striated muscle in that it was less sensitive to p-chloromercuribenzoate. Sulfhydryl compounds, such as BAL or cysteine, enhanced the staining of the above mentioned sites of true adenosine triphosphatase activity. On the other hand, these -SH compounds are powerful inhibitors of alkaline phosphatase activity, especially toward adenosine-5-phosphate. When adenosine triphosphate was the substrate, BAL prevented the staining of the brush borders of the kidney tubules and intestinal epithelium, thus suggesting the participation of alkaline phosphatase in the dephosphorylation of adenosine triphosphate. Furthermore, the staining of these brush borders was unaffected by the -SH inhibitors. The strong phosphatase activity of endothelium and vascular smooth muscle toward adenosine triphosphate was seemingly indifferent to -SH groups, since the staining of these structures was not markedly influenced by -SH inhibitors or compounds. The nature of this staining has not been elucidated. Comparisons of the localization of phosphatase activity toward adenosine triphosphate, -diphosphate or -5-phosphate were made in the ventricle, tongue, kidney, and duodenum. Differences in the localization of phosphatase activity toward adenosine triphosphate and adenosine-5-phosphate were also made in liver, lung, spleen, uterus, and aorta.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/3.3.170

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,215

Metadata

Authors
PADYKULA, H. A., & HERMAN, E.
Venue
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
Published
1955-05
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
170-195
ISSN
  • 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-5044
OpenAlex
W2092069118
Cited by
1,215
References
0
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE SPECIFICITY OF THE HISTOCHEMICAL METHOD FOR ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATAS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/3.3.170
The paper
PADYKULA, H. A., & HERMAN, E. (1955). THE SPECIFICITY OF THE HISTOCHEMICAL METHOD FOR ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATAS. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/3.3.170

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.