Cited by 1,094Muscle Physiology and DisordersSports Performance and TrainingMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics

Open access
Miller, A. E. J., MacDougall, J. D., Tarnopolsky, M. A., Sale, D. G.·1993·European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology

Abstract

Strength and muscle characteristics were examined in biceps brachii and vastus lateralis of eight men and eight women. Measurements included motor unit number, size and activation and voluntary strength of the elbow flexors and knee extensors. Fiber areas and type were determined from needle biopsies and muscle areas by computerized tomographical scanning. The women were approximately 52% and 66% as strong as the men in the upper and lower body respectively. The men were also stronger relative to lean body mass. A significant correlation was found between strength and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA; P < or = 0.05). The women had 45, 41, 30 and 25% smaller muscle CSAs for the biceps brachii, total elbow flexors, vastus lateralis and total knee extensors respectively. The men had significantly larger type I fiber areas (4597 vs 3483 microns2) and mean fiber areas (6632 vs 3963 microns2) than the women in biceps brachii and significantly larger type II fiber areas (7700 vs 4040 microns2) and mean fiber areas (7070 vs 4290 microns2) in vastus lateralis. No significant gender difference was found in the strength to CSA ratio for elbow flexion or knee extension, in biceps fiber number (180,620 in men vs 156,872 in women), muscle area to fiber area ratio in the vastus lateralis 451,468 vs 465,007) or any motor unit characteristics. Data suggest that the greater strength of the men was due primarily to larger fibers. The greater gender difference in upper body strength can probably be attributed to the fact that women tend to have a lower proportion of their lean tissue distributed in the upper body.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00235103

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, A. E. J., MacDougall, J. D., Tarnopolsky, M. A., & Sale, D. G.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
Published
1993-03
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
254-262
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-5548
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2055302806
Cited by
1,094
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 36
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MacSphere (McMaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • MacSphere (McMaster University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
sex differences, muscle strength, muscle fiber area, muscle fiber type, biceps brachii, vastus lateralis, muscle cross-sectional area, motor unit number, motor unit size, motor unit activation, lean body mass, elbow flexors, knee extensors
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Height, Body Weight, Elbow, Electromyography, Extremities, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Isotonic Contraction, Knee, Male, Motor Neurons, Muscles, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review