The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of DNA fragmentation in apoptosis: application of in situ nick translation to cell culture systems and tissue sections.
Open accessAbstract
Since DNA fragmentation is a key feature of programmed cell death (PCD) and also occurs in certain stages of necrosis, we have adapted the methodology of in situ nick-translation (ISNT) to detect DNA fragmentation on a single-cell level. We first established the technique for cell preparations. Apoptosis was induced by gamma-irradiation on freshly isolated rat thymocytes. After fixation procedures, ISNT was performed by overnight incubation either with fluorescein-12-dUTP or with digoxigenin-labeled 11-dUTP and DNA polymerase I. The enzymatic incorporation of labeled nucleotides at sites of DNA fragmentation was detected by flow cytometry either directly or indirectly with fluorescein-conjugated anti-digoxigenin. The quantitative results demonstrated close correlation with morphological essays for apoptosis, DNA gel electrophoresis, and ISNT. Proliferating cells determined by bromodeoxyuridine immunofluorescence were not labeled by ISNT. Immunocytochemistry for cell surface antigens in combination with ISNT allowed the identification of specific cell types undergoing PCD. Furthermore, the simultaneous application of photolabeling techniques with ethidium monoazide and ISNT led to the identification of DNA fragmentation in cells with still intact membranes. Extending ISNT to tissue sections of paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded material reliably revealed labeling of cells with typical morphological features of apoptosis. However, this technique was not useful in detecting early stages of necrotic cell death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Koopman, G., Reutelingsperger, C., Kuijten, G., Keehnen, R., Pals, S., & van Oers, M. (1994) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v84.5.1415.1415 · Cited by 2,681
Distinct Patterns of Multiple Sclerosis Pathology Indicates Heterogeneity in Pathogenesis
Lucchinetti, C. F., Brück, W., Rodriguez, M., & Lassmann, H. (1996) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.1996.tb00854.x · Cited by 733
Self-citationCell death in Alzheimer's disease evaluated by DNA fragmentation in situ
Lassmann, H., Bancher, C., Breitschopf, H., Wegiel, J., Bobinski, M., Jellinger, K., & Wisniewski, H. M. (1995) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00294257 · Cited by 458
Self-citationAn overview of apoptosis assays detecting DNA fragmentation
Majtnerová, P., & Roušar, T. (2018) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-018-4258-9 · Cited by 330
Disease-specific molecular events in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions
Fischer, M. T., Wimmer, I., Höftberger, R., Gerlach, S., Haider, L., Zrzavy, T., Hametner, S., Mahad, D., Binder, C. J., Krumbholz, M., et al. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt110 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gold, R., Schmied, M., Rothe, G., Zischler, H., Breitschopf, H., Wekerle, H., & Lassmann, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1023-1030
- ISSN
- 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2137033662
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of DNA fragmentation in apoptosis: application of in situ nick translation to cell culture systems and tissue sections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/41.7.8515045
- The paper
- Gold, R., Schmied, M., Rothe, G., Zischler, H., Breitschopf, H., Wekerle, H., & Lassmann, H. (1993). Detection of DNA fragmentation in apoptosis: application of in situ nick translation to cell culture systems and tissue sections. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/41.7.8515045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.