Cited by 4Thoreau and American LiteratureSocial Media in Health EducationPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Health Care Students Who Frequently Use Facebook Are Unaware of the Risks for Violating HIPAA Standards: A Pilot Study

Open access
Bagley, Jennifer E., DiGiacinto, Dora, Lawyer, Jaclyn, Anderson, Michael P.·2014·Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography

Abstract

Social networking creates easy opportunities to violate HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). The purpose of this study is to determine if students who frequently update their Facebook statuses have the ability to identify certain Facebook postings as HIPAA violations. An anonymous survey was distributed to students on a university campus of a health sciences center, containing questions related to how often Facebook was used or accessed, how often students updated their Facebook statuses, and whether they could identify if specific online postings constituted HIPAA violations. Students’ HIPAA scenario responses were compared to their frequency of Facebook status updates, and students who frequently updated their information were more likely to incorrectly identify a HIPAA violation—namely, photos of patients posted to Facebook, even those devoid of identifying information. No other HIPAA violation scenarios demonstrated an association with frequencies of use or status updates. Further research needs to be conducted to see what traits or behaviors put students at risk for violating HIPAA through social networking sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/8756479314530509

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hader AL, Brown ED: Legal briefs: patient privacy and social media. AANA J 2010;78:270-274.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bagley, J. E., DiGiacinto, D., Lawyer, J., & Anderson, M. P.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
DiGiacinto, Dora
Venue
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
Published
2014-04-09
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
114-120
ISSN
  • 1552-5430 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-4793
OpenAlex
W2155095948
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of diagnostic medical sonography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
HIPAA, Facebook, social networking, health professions students, privacy awareness, patient confidentiality, online posts, health sciences education, risk awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review