Cited by 907Construction Project Management and PerformanceCapital Investment and Risk AnalysisOrganizational Change and Leadership

A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success

Open access
Jugdev, Kam, Müller, Ralf·2005·Project Management Journal

Abstract

Our views on project success have changed over the years from definitions that were limited to the implementation phase of the project life cycle to definitions that reflect an appreciation of success over the entire project and product life cycle. This paper assesses our evolving understanding of project success over the past 40 years and discusses conditions for success, critical success factors and success frameworks. The paper concludes with a holistic view of project success and its implications for practice. This is an important topic because projects are an increasingly common way of work, and the lines between project and process work are harder to discern. Increasingly, more project managers work in companies using program and portfolio management as a means to organize project-related work. The success of individual projects, therefore, impacts the wider organization in several dimensions and makes the concept of project and project management success that much more relevant. The topic is also important because it has a bearing on the future directions of project management in the strategic context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/875697280503600403

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The traditional approach to project management is insufficient to deal with today's dynamic business requirements.

    “Many organizations today are using a well-established approach and a set of universal techniques to manage their projects; yet they often find out that the traditional approach to project management is insufficient to deal with today's dynamic business requirements.”

    From What is Strategic Project Leadership? (2015) · cites this paper as [2]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jugdev, K., & Müller, R.
Affiliations
  • Athabasca University (CA)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Project Management Journal
Published
2005-12
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
19-31
ISSN
  • 1938-9507 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-9728
OpenAlex
W2810451685
Cited by
907
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 44
FWCI
19.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Project Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
Keywords
project success, success factors, project life cycle, product life cycle, program management, portfolio management, project management practices, strategic project management, history of project management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review