A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success
Open accessAbstract
Our views on project success have changed over the years from definitions that were limited to the implementation phase of the project life cycle to definitions that reflect an appreciation of success over the entire project and product life cycle. This paper assesses our evolving understanding of project success over the past 40 years and discusses conditions for success, critical success factors and success frameworks. The paper concludes with a holistic view of project success and its implications for practice. This is an important topic because projects are an increasingly common way of work, and the lines between project and process work are harder to discern. Increasingly, more project managers work in companies using program and portfolio management as a means to organize project-related work. The success of individual projects, therefore, impacts the wider organization in several dimensions and makes the concept of project and project management success that much more relevant. The topic is also important because it has a bearing on the future directions of project management in the strategic context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The traditional approach to project management is insufficient to deal with today's dynamic business requirements.
“Many organizations today are using a well-established approach and a set of universal techniques to manage their projects; yet they often find out that the traditional approach to project management is insufficient to deal with today's dynamic business requirements.”
From What is Strategic Project Leadership? (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Atkinson, R. (1999) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00069-6 · Cited by 2,359 · see citing works
The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success
Baccarini, D. (1999) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/875697289903000405 · Cited by 1,136 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faculty of Business Administration, H. C. M. C. O. U., DOAN, T. T. T., NGUYEN, L. C. T., & NGUYEN, T. D. N. (2020) · The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business · doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no3.223 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
What is Strategic Project Leadership?
Shenhar, A. (2015) · Open Economics and Management Journal · doi:10.2174/2352630001502010029 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“2352-6300/15 2015 Bentham Open Keywords: Innovation, project management, project spirit, project strategy, science and art of project management, strategic project leadership.”
Background
- Authors
- Jugdev, K., & Müller, R.
- Affiliations
- Athabasca University (CA)
- Umeå University (SE)
- Venue
- Project Management Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 19-31
- ISSN
- 1938-9507 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-9728
- OpenAlex
- W2810451685
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 44
- FWCI
- 19.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Project Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Keywords
- project success, success factors, project life cycle, product life cycle, program management, portfolio management, project management practices, strategic project management, history of project management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review