The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method
Abstract
Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a widely applied and useful tool for project management scholars. In this Thoughtlet article, we critically reflect on the measurement philosophy underlying the two streams of SEM and their adequacy for estimating relationships among concepts commonly encountered in the field (e.g., team performance). We also discuss considerations to ponder when making the choice between the two types of SEM as well as between SEM and regression analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-02-2019-0189 · Cited by 4,618
Self-citationHair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x · Cited by 2,712
Self-citationRethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2018-0665 · Cited by 1,839
Self-citation
Cited by
Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis
Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069 · Cited by 5,446
Self-citationHair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027 · Cited by 2,833
Self-citationPartial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022) · Handbook of Market Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15 · Cited by 1,483
Self-citationPartial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021) · Handbook of Market Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2 · Cited by 876
Self-citationExecuting and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: updates for family business researchers
Hair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100392 · Cited by 860
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M.
- Venue
- Project Management Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 619-624
- ISSN
- 1938-9507 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-9728
- OpenAlex
- W2993265484
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/8756972819882132
- The paper
- Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method. Project Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819882132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
