CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 876

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling

Sarstedt, Marko, Ringle, Christian M., Hair, Joseph F.·2021·Handbook of Market Research
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 162

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: Free Press.
  2. Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., & Rönkkö, M. (2018). Statistical inference with PLSc using bootstrap confidence intervals. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 1001–1020. · DOI
  3. Akter, S., Fosso Wamba, S., & Dewan, S. (2017). Why PLS-SEM is suitable for complex modeling? An empirical illustration in big data analytics quality. Production Planning & Control, 28(11–12), 1011–1021. · DOI
  4. Albers, S. (2010). PLS and success factor studies in marketing. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (Springer handbooks of computational statistics series) (Vol. II, pp. 409–425). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. · DOI
  5. Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. The International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 514–538. · DOI
  6. Avkiran, N. K., & Ringle, C. M. (Eds.). (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Recent advances in banking and finance. Cham: Springer.
  7. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161. · DOI
  8. Bayonne, E., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2020). Partial least squares (PLS) in operations management research: Insights from a systematic literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 13(3), 565–597. · DOI
  9. Becker, J.-M., & Ismail, I. R. (2016). Accounting for sampling weights in PLS path modeling: Simulations and empirical examples. European Management Journal, 34(6), 606–617. · DOI
  10. Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., & Rigdon, E. E. (2013a). Predictive validity and formative measurement in structural equation modeling: Embracing practical relevance. In 2013 Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Milan.
  11. Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C. M., & Völckner, F. (2013b). Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 665–694. · DOI
  12. Bentler, P. M., & Huang, W. (2014). On components, latent variables, PLS and simple methods: Reactions to Rigdon’s rethinking of PLS. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 138–145. · DOI
  13. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. · DOI
  14. Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 605–634. · DOI
  15. Bollen, K. A. (2011). Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 359–372. · DOI
  16. Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 265–284. · DOI
  17. Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). In defense of causal–formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 581–596. · DOI
  18. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–314. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110(2), 203–219. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Cenfetelli, R. T., & Bassellier, G. (2009). Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 689–708. · DOI
  21. Cepeda Carrión, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67–89. · DOI
  22. Cheah, J.-H., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Ramayah, T., & Ting, H. (2018). Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3192–3210. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Cheah, J.-H., Roldán, J. L., Ciavolino, E., Ting, H., & Ramayah, T. (2020). Sampling weight adjustments in partial least squares structural equation modeling: Guidelines and illustrations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, forthcoming. · DOI
  24. Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (Springer handbooks of computational statistics series) (Vol. II, pp. 655–690). Heidelberg: Springer. · DOI
  25. Chin, W. W., Cheah, J.-H., Liu, Y., Ting, H., Lim, X.-J., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Demystifying the role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural equation modeling in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2161–2209. · DOI
  26. Cho, G., & Choi, J. Y. (2020). An empirical comparison of generalized structured component analysis and partial least squares path modeling under variance-based structural equation models. Behaviormetrika, 47, 243–272. · DOI
  27. Chou, C.-P., Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-Normal data in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44(2), 347–357. · DOI
  28. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  29. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Danks, N., & Ray, S. (2018). Predictions from partial least squares models. In F. Ali, S. M. Rasoolimanesh, & C. Cobanoglu (Eds.), Applying partial least squares in tourism and hospitality research (pp. 35–52). Bingley: Emerald. · DOI
  31. Danks, N. P., Sharma, P. N., & Sarstedt, M. (2020). Model selection uncertainty and multimodel inference in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Journal of Business Research, 113, 13–24. · DOI
  32. Diamantopoulos, A. (2006). The error term in formative measurement models: Interpretation and modeling implications. Journal of Modelling in Management, 1(1), 7–17. · DOI
  33. Diamantopoulos, A. (2011). Incorporating formative measures into covariance-based structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 335–358. · DOI
  34. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277. · DOI
  35. Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. · DOI
  36. Dijkstra, T. K. (2010). Latent variables and indices: Herman Wold’s basic design and partial least squares. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (Springer handbooks of computational statistics series) (Vol. II, pp. 23–46). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. · DOI
  37. Dijkstra, T. K. (2014). PLS’ Janus face – Response to professor Rigdon’s ‘rethinking partial least squares modeling: In praise of simple methods’. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 146–153. · DOI
  38. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015a). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 81, 10–23. · DOI
  39. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015b). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. · DOI · Paper page
  40. do Valle, P. O., & Assaker, G. (2016). Using partial least squares structural equation modeling in tourism research: A review of past research and recommendations for future applications. Journal of Travel Research, 55(6), 695–708. · DOI
  41. Douglas, H. E. (2009). Reintroducing prediction to explanation. Philosophy of Science, 76(4), 444–463. · DOI
  42. Eberl, M. (2010). An application of PLS in multi-group analysis: The need for differentiated corporate-level Marketing in the Mobile Communications Industry. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (Springer handbooks of computational statistics series) (Vol. II, pp. 487–514). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. · DOI
  43. Eberl, M., & Schwaiger, M. (2005). Corporate reputation: Disentangling the effects on financial performance. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8), 838–854. · DOI
  44. Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 155–174. · DOI
  45. Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (Springer handbooks of computational statistics series) (Vol. II). Heidelberg: Springer.
  46. Evermann, J., & Tate, M. (2016). Assessing the predictive performance of structural equation model estimators. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4565–4582. · DOI
  47. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: University of Akron Press.
  48. Fordellone, M., & Vichi, M. (2020). Finding groups in structural equation modeling through the partial least squares algorithm. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 147, 106957. · DOI
  49. Fornell, C. G., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. · DOI
  50. Fornell, C. G., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7–18. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. · DOI
  52. Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares regression and structural equation models. Asheboro: Statistical Associates.
  53. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 25 step by step: A simple guide and reference (15th ed.). New York: Routledge. · DOI · Paper page
  54. Geweke, J., & Meese, R. (1981). Estimating regression models of finite but unknown order. International Economic Review, 22(1), 55–70. · DOI
  55. Ghasemy, M., Teeroovengadum, V., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). This fast car can move faster: A review of PLS-SEM application in higher education research. Higher Education, 80, 1121–1152. · DOI
  56. Goodhue, D. L., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2012). Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-Normal data? MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 981–1001. · DOI
  57. Grace, J. B., & Bollen, K. A. (2008). Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: The role of composite variables. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 15(2), 191–213. · DOI
  58. Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238–1249. · DOI · Paper page
  59. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A Beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283–297. · DOI
  60. Hahn, C., Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2002). Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54(3), 243–269. · DOI
  61. Hair, J. F. (2021). Next-generation prediction metrics for composite-based PLS-SEM. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(1), 5–11. · DOI
  62. Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Composites vs. factors: Implications for choosing the right SEM method. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 1–6. · DOI
  63. Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2021a). Data, measurement, and causal inferences in machine learning: Opportunities and challenges for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 29(1), 65–77. · DOI
  64. Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2021b). Explanation plus prediction – The logical focus of project management research. Project Management Journal, forthcoming. · DOI
  65. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012a). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 320–340. · DOI
  67. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1–12. · DOI · Paper page
  68. Hair, J. F., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017a). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018a). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Mason: Cengage.
  70. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018b). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage. · DOI
  71. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019a). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019b). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584. · DOI · Paper page
  73. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  74. Helm, S., Eggert, A., & Garnefeld, I. (2010). Modelling the impact of corporate reputation on customer satisfaction and loyalty using PLS. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (Springer handbooks of computational statistics series) (Vol. II, pp. 515–534). Heidelberg: Springer. · DOI
  75. Henseler, J. (2017). Using variance-based structural equation modeling for empirical advertising research at the Interface of design and behavioral research. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178–192. · DOI
  76. Henseler, J. (2021). Composite-based structural equation modeling: Analyzing latent and emergent variables. New York: Guilford Press.
  77. Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580. · DOI
  78. Henseler, J., & Schuberth, F. (2020). Using confirmatory composite analysis to assess emergent variables in business research. Journal of Business Research, 120, 147–156. · DOI
  79. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–320). Bingley: Emerald.
  80. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in international advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues. In S. Okazaki (Ed.), Handbook of research in international advertising (pp. 252–276). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  81. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016b). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. · DOI · Paper page
  82. Houston, M. B. (2004). Assessing the validity of secondary data proxies for marketing constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 154–161. · DOI
  83. Hui, B. S., & Wold, H. (1982). Consistency and consistency at large of partial least squares estimates. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation, part II (pp. 119–130). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  84. Hult, G. T. M., Hair, J. F., Dorian, P., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Pinkwart, A. (2018). Addressing endogeneity in marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3), 1–21. · DOI
  85. Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., Cheah, J.-H., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). A concept analysis of methodological research on composite-based structural equation modeling: Bridging PLSPM and GSCA. Behaviormetrika, 47(1), 219–241. · DOI
  86. Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 255–284). New York: Seminar Press.
  87. Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: Historical and comparative aspects. In H. Wold & K. G. Jöreskog (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation, part I (pp. 263–270). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  88. Kaufmann, L., & Gaeckler, J. (2015). A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(4), 259–272. · DOI
  89. Khan, G., Sarstedt, M., Shiau, W.-L., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Fritze, M. (2019). Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A social network analysis. Internet Research, 29(3), 407–429. · DOI
  90. Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. · DOI · Paper page
  91. Latan, H., & Noonan, R. (Eds.). (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
  92. Lee, L., Petter, S., Fayard, D., & Robinson, S. (2011). On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(4), 305–328. · DOI
  93. Lei, P.-W., & Wu, Q. (2012). Estimation in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 164–179). New York: Guilford Press.
  94. Liengaard, B. D., Sharma, P. N., Hult, G. T. M., Jensen, M. B., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Prediction: Coveted, yet forsaken? Introducing a cross-validated predictive ability test in partial least squares path modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(2), 362–292. · DOI
  95. Leischnig, A., Henneberg, S. C., & Thornton, S. C. (2016). Net versus combinatory effects of firm and industry antecedents of sales growth. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3576–3583. · DOI
  96. Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg: Physica. · DOI
  97. Manley, S. C., Hair, J. F., Williams, R. I., & McDowell, W. C. (2020). Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, forthcoming. · DOI
  98. Marcoulides, G. A., & Chin, W. W. (2013). You write, but others read: Common methodological misunderstandings in PLS and related methods. In H. Abdi, W. W. Chin, V. Esposito Vinzi, G. Russolillo, & L. Trinchera (Eds.), New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods (Springer proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics) (Vol. 56, pp. 31–64). New York: Springer. · DOI
  99. Marcoulides, G. A., & Saunders, C. (2006). Editor’s comments: PLS: A silver bullet? MIS Quarterly, 30(2), iii–ix. · DOI
  100. Marcoulides, G. A., Chin, W. W., & Saunders, C. (2012). When imprecise statistical statements become problematic: A response to Goodhue, Lewis, and Thompson. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 717–728. · DOI
  101. Mason, C. H., & Perreault, W. D. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 268–280. · DOI
  102. Mateos-Aparicio, G. (2011). Partial least squares (PLS) methods: Origins, evolution, and application to social sciences. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 40(13), 2305–2317. · DOI
  103. Matthews, L. (2017). Applying multigroup analysis in PLS-SEM: A step-by-step process. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 219–243). Cham: Springer. · DOI
  104. McDonald, R. P. (1996). Path analysis with composite variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(2), 239–270. · DOI
  105. Mehmetoglu, M., & Venturini, S. (2021). Structural equation modelling with partial least squares using Stata and R. Boca Raton: CRC Press. · DOI
  106. Memon, M. A., Cheah, J. H., Ramayah, H. T., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2019). Moderation analysis: Issues and guidelines. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), i–xi. · DOI
  107. Nitzl, C., & Chin, W. W. (2017). The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting. Journal of Management Control, 28(2), 137–156. · DOI
  108. Nitzl, C., Roldán, J. L., & Cepeda Carrión, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(9), 1849–1864. · DOI
  109. Noonan, R., & Wold, H. (1982). PLS path modeling with indirectly observed variables: A comparison of alternative estimates for the latent variable. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observations: Part II (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  110. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
  111. Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(4), 557–595. · DOI
  112. Raithel, S., & Schwaiger, M. (2015). The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general public on shareholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 945–956. · DOI
  113. Raithel, S., Sarstedt, M., Scharf, S., & Schwaiger, M. (2012). On the value relevance of customer satisfaction: Multiple drivers and multiple markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(4), 509–525. · DOI
  114. Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2016). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated and practical guide to statistical analysis. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson.
  115. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Olya, H. (2021). The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: Partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, forthcoming. · DOI · Paper page
  116. Rhemtulla, M., van Bork, R., & Borsboom, D. (2020). Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 30–45. · DOI
  117. Richter, N. F., Sinkovics, R. R., Ringle, C. M., & Schlägel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 376–404. · DOI
  118. Richter, N. F., Schubring, S., Hauff, S., Ringle, C. M.. & Sarstedt, M. (2020). When predictors of outcomes are necessary: Guidelines for the combined use of PLS-SEM and NCA. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2243–2267. · DOI
  119. Rigdon, E. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 341–358. · DOI
  120. Rigdon, E. E. (2013). Partial least squares path modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling. A second course (2nd ed., pp. 81–116). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
  121. Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598–605. · DOI
  122. Rigdon, E. E., Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Karahanna, E., Straub, D., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2014). Conflating antecedents and formative indicators: A comment on Aguirre-Urreta and Marakas. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 780–784. · DOI
  123. Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. Five perspectives and five recommendations. Marketing ZFP–Journal of Research and Management, 39(3), 4–16. · DOI
  124. Rigdon, E. E., Becker, J. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Factor indeterminacy as metrological uncertainty: Implications for advancing psychological measurement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(3), 429–443. · DOI
  125. Ringle, C. M. (2019). What makes a great textbook? Lessons learned from joe Hair. In B. J. Babin & M. Sarstedt (Eds.), The great facilitator: Reflections on the contributions of Joseph F. Hair, Jr. to marketing and business research (pp. 131–150). Cham: Springer. · DOI
  126. Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886. · DOI
  127. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Schlittgen, R., & Taylor, C. R. (2013). PLS path modeling and evolutionary segmentation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1318–1324. · DOI
  128. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Schlittgen, R. (2014). Genetic algorithm segmentation in partial least squares structural equation modeling. OR Spectrum, 36(1), 251–276. · DOI
  129. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643. · DOI · Paper page
  130. Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. L. Steenkamp, & M. Raisinghani (Eds.), Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (pp. 193–221). Hershey: IGI Global. · DOI
  131. Russo, D., & Stol, K. J. (2021). PLS-SEM for software engineering research: An introduction and survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4), 1–38. · DOI
  132. Sarstedt, M. (2019). Der Knacks and a Silver Bullet. In B. J. Babin & M. Sarstedt (Eds.), The great facilitator: Reflections on the contributions of Joseph F. Hair, Jr. to marketing and business research (pp. 155–164). Cham: Springer. · DOI
  133. Sarstedt, M., & Cheah, J.-H. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7(3), 196–202. · DOI
  134. Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. (2019). A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics (3rd ed.). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. · DOI
  135. Sarstedt, M., Becker, J.-M., Ringle, C. M., & Schwaiger, M. (2011). Uncovering and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Which model selection criterion provides an appropriate number of segments? Schmalenbach Business Review, 63(1), 34–62. · DOI
  136. Sarstedt, M., Wilczynski, P., & Melewar, T. C. (2013). Measuring reputation in global markets – A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 329–339. · DOI
  137. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. · DOI · Paper page
  138. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. · DOI
  139. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order models. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. · DOI
  140. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Nitzl, C., Ringle, C. M., & Howard, M. C. (2020a). Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use PLS-SEM for mediation analyses! International Journal of Market Research, 62(3), 288–299. · DOI
  141. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020b). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531–554. · DOI · Paper page
  142. Schlittgen, R., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J.-M. (2016). Segmentation of PLS path models by iterative reweighted regressions. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4583–4592. · DOI
  143. Schloderer, M. P., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2014). The relevance of reputation in the nonprofit sector: The moderating effect of socio-demographic characteristics. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19(2), 110–126. · DOI
  144. Schuberth, F., Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2018). Confirmatory composite analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2541. · DOI
  145. Schwaiger, M. (2004). Components and parameters of corporate reputation: An empirical study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56(1), 46–71. · DOI
  146. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. · DOI · Paper page
  147. Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 148–169. · DOI
  148. Sharma, P. N., Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., & Ray S. (2018). Prediction-oriented model selection in partial least squares path modeling. Decision Sciences, forthcoming. · DOI
  149. Shmueli, G. (2010). To explain or to predict? Statistical Science, 25(3), 289–310. · DOI
  150. Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553–572. · DOI · Paper page
  151. Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Evaluating the predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. · DOI
  152. Shugan, S. (2009). Relevancy is robust prediction, not alleged realism. Marketing Science, 28(5), 991–998. · DOI
  153. Stieglitz, S., Linh, D.-X., Bruns, A., & Neuberger, C. (2014). Social media analytics. An interdisciplinary approach and its implications for information systems. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6, 89–96 · DOI
  154. Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. · DOI · Paper page
  155. Usakli, A., & Kucukergin, K. G. (2018). Using partial least squares structural equation modeling in hospitality and tourism: Do researchers follow practical guidelines? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3462–3512. · DOI
  156. Westland, J. C. (2019). Partial least squares path analysis. In Structural equation models: From paths to networks (2nd ed., pp. 17–38). Cham: Springer. · DOI
  157. Wold, H. (1975). Path models with latent variables: The NIPALS approach. In H. M. Blalock, A. Aganbegian, F. M. Borodkin, R. Boudon, & V. Capecchi (Eds.), Quantitative sociology: International perspectives on mathematical and statistical modeling (pp. 307–357). New York: Academic. · DOI
  158. Wold, H. (1980). Model construction and evaluation when theoretical knowledge is scarce: Theory and application of PLS. In J. Kmenta & J. B. Ramsey (Eds.), Evaluation of econometric models (pp. 47–74). New York: Academic. · DOI
  159. Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observations: Part II (pp. 1–54). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  160. Wold, H. (1985). Partial least squares. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 581–591). New York: Wiley.
  161. Wong, K. K. K. (2019). Mastering partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS in 38 hours. Bloomington: iUniverse.
  162. Zeng, N., Liu, Y., Gong, P, Hertogh, M., & König, M. (2021). Do right PLS and do PLS right: A critical review of the application on PLS in construction management reserarch. Frontiers of Engineering Management, forthcoming. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 876

Metadata

Authors
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F.
Venue
Handbook of Market Research
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2021
Pages
1-47
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
Cited by
876
References
21
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review