Cited by 6Archaeology and Natural HistoryArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence of Prehistoric Irrigation in Northern Ecuador

Myers, Thomas P.·1974·Journal of Field Archaeology

Abstract

Field evidence for the existence of irrigation at a late pre-Inca site in northern Ecuador is examined. The implications of irrigation agriculture are examined with respect to the probable level of socio-political complexity. It is concluded that the pre-Inca societies of northern Ecuador were more stable and more clearly stratified than had been suspected previously. They were, therefore, an attractive addition to the Inca Empire which was unwilling or unable to conquer the jungle tribes only a few kilometers from its capital.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/009346974791491331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Myers, T. P.
Venue
Journal of Field Archaeology
Published
1974-01
Volume
1
Issue
3-4
Pages
309-313
ISSN
  • 0093-4690 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-4582
OpenAlex
W2031809609
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Field Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Archaeology and Natural History
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Keywords
prehistoric irrigation, irrigated agriculture, northern Ecuador, sociopolitical complexity, social stratification, Inca Empire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review