CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Amazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningArchaeological and Geological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chapter 5. Conduits of Ancestry: Interpretation of the Geography, Geology, and Seasonality of North Andean Shaft Tombs

Doyon, Leon G.·2002·Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association
DOI 10.1525/ap3a.2002.11.1.79
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Contextual evidence for shaft tombs and related mortuary practices in the highlands of Ecuador and southern Colombia is presented. Emphasis is given to the practical aspects of construction in light of changing settlement patterns (ca. A.D. 1–1500). Shaft tombs not only conformed to geophysical restraints and the demands of subsistence agriculture, they also exploited the ideological potentials of the landscape and its seasonal changes. Shaft tomb cemeteries are consistently located in relation to peculiar topographical, geological, hydrological, and cultural features that were modified where possible and necessary. With the added perspective of ethnographically and ethnohistorically documented native attitudes toward the landscape, the passage of time, and the place of the dead in both, 1 interpret the seemingly disparate contextual features of shaft tombs and related mortuary monuments as historically interrelated developments in hierarchical societies established and maintained fundamentally through appeal to ancestries both real and fictive.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/ap3a.2002.11.1.79

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Athens J. S., 1974, Archaeological Investigations in the Highlands of Northern Ecuador. 2 pts. Brevarios de Cultura, No. 1
  2. Bray T. L., 1991, The Effects of Inca Imperialism on the Northern Frontiers
  3. Cadavid Camargo G., 1989, Arqueología de salvamiento en la vereda de Tajumbina, Municipio de La Cruz, Nariño, Boletín de Arqueología (Bogotá), 4, 3
  4. Chaves A., 1980, Entierros Primarios de Tierradentro
  5. Chaves A., 1984, Tierradentro
  6. Correal Urrego G., 1977, Una tumba de pozo con cámara lateral: Apéndice A, Textiles Arqueológicos de Nariño, by M. Cardale de Schrimpff, Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 21, 270
  7. Cruxent J. M., 1956, Noticia de una estación arqueológica de la Hacienda Pucará en El Angel–Ecuador, Antropológica (Caracas), 1, 33
  8. Doyon L. G.1988Tumbas de la nobleza en La Florida. InQuito Antes de Benalcazar I.Cruz Cevallos ed. pp.51–66 86–100 Quito. Centro Cultural Artes.
  9. Drennan R. D.1985Archaeological Survey and Excavation. InRegional Archaeology in the Valle de La Plata Colombia: A Preliminary Report on the 1984 Season of the Proyecto Arqueológico Valle de La Plata R.Drennan ed. pp.117–80. Museum of Anthropology University of Michigan Technical Reports No. 16 Ann Arbor.
  10. Drennan R. D., 1995, Tombs for the Living: Andean Mortuary Practices, 79
  11. Echeverría A.J. H., 1977, Contributión al conocimiento Arqueológico de la Provincia de Pichincha: sitios Chilibulo y Chillógallo, Revista de la Universidad Católica (Quito), 5, 181
  12. Ford J. A., 1944, Excavations in the Vicinity ofCali
  13. Francisco A. E.1969An Archaeological Sequence from Carchi Ecuador.Ph.D. dissertation University of California Berkeley. Ann Arbor Mich .:University Microfilms.
  14. Fresco A., 1984, La Arqueología de Ingapirca (Ecuador): Costumhres Funerarias, Cerámica y Otros Materiales
  15. Gähwiler‐Walder T., 1988, Archaeological Investigations in the Pavas‐La Cumbre Region, Pro Calima, 5, 50
  16. Gondard P., 1983, Inventario Arqueológico Preliminar de los Andes Septentrionales del Ecuador
  17. Grijalva C., 1937, La Expedición de Max Uhle a Cuasmal o Sea la Protohistoria de Imbabura y Carchi
  18. Guignabaudet P., 1953, Nuevos descubrimientos Arqueológicos en las Tolas de Huaraqui, Boletín de Informaciones Cientificas Nacionales (Quito), 56, 168
  19. Haro Alvear S. L., 1980, Mitos v Cultos del Reino de Quito
  20. Himelfarb E. J., 2000, Hamlet Had It Wrong: A Journey through Medieval Denmark Flips the Switch on the “Dark Ages, Archaeology, 53, 66
  21. Jijón y Caamaño J., 1914, Contribución al Conocimiento de los Aborígenes de la Provincia de Imbabura, en la República del Ecuador
  22. Jijón y Caamaño J., 1920, Nueva contribución al conocimiento de los aborígenes de la Provincia de Imbabura, Boletín de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Estudios Históricos Americanos, 4, 1
  23. Jijón y Caamaño J., 1927, Puruhd: Contribución al Conocimiento de los Aborígenes de la Provincia del Chimborazo de la República del Ecuador. 2 vols
  24. Jijón y Caamaño J., 1990, [1916] La Religión del Imperio de los Incas
  25. Knapp G., 1988, Ecologia Cultural Prehispdnica del Ecuador
  26. Kunter K., 1981, Cochasqui: Estudios Arqueológicos, 171
  27. Long S., 1967, Razón y Fábula, 73
  28. Lothrop S. K., 1937, Coclé: An Archaeological Study of Central Panama
  29. Mendez Gutierrez M., 1985, Arqueología de un Si/io Transicional en el Valle de Popayán: La Balsa‐Cajibio‐Cauca
  30. Meyers A., 1981, Cochasquí: Estudios Arqueológicos, 143
  31. Molestina Zaldumbide M. de C., 1985, Investigaciones arqueológicas en la zona Negativo del Carchi o Capuli, Cultura (Quito), 7, 31
  32. Moreno Yánez S. E., 1988, Nueva Historia del Ecuador, 9
  33. Moya R., 1981, Simbolismo y Ritual en el Ecuador Andino. Colección Pendoneros, vol. 40, pt. 1
  34. 10.2307/529298 · DOI
  35. Myers T. P., 1978, Current Research: Ecuador, American Antiquity, 43, 523
  36. Oberem U., 1981, Cochasqui: Estudios Arqueológicos, 125
  37. Oberem U., 1981, Cochasqui: Estudios Arqueológicos, 39
  38. Perdomo L., 1974, Estudio preliminar sobre la zona arqueológica de Pupiales, Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 17, 143
  39. Porras G. P. I., 1980, Arqueología del Ecuador
  40. Porras G. P. I., 1982, Arqueología de Quito I: Fase Cotocollao
  41. Salomon F.1978Ethnic Lords of Quito in the Age of the Incas: The Political Economy of North‐Andean Chiefdoms.Ph.D. dissertation Department of Anthropology Cornell University. Ann Arbor Mich. : University Microfilms.
  42. Salomon F., 1987, Natives and Neighbors in South America, 207
  43. Smith M. E., 1977, A Model for the Diffusion of the Shaft Tomb Complex from South America to West Mexico, Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society, 9, 179
  44. Taussig M. T., 1986, Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man
  45. Uhle M., 1926, Excavaciones arqueológicas en la región de Cumbayá, Anales de la Universidad Central (Quito), 37, 5
  46. Uhle M., 1937, Las ruinas de Cochasquí, Revista del Museo Nacíonal (Lima), 4, 86
  47. Uribe M. V., 1986, La estratificación social entre los Proto‐Pasto, Miscelanea Antropológica Ecuatoriana, 6, 211
  48. Villalba O. M., 1988, Cotocollao: Una Aldea Formativa del Valle de Quito. Miscelanea Antropológica Ecuatoriana, Serie Monográfica 2
  49. Wurster W., 1981, Cochasquí: Estudios Arqueológicos, 79
  50. Zuidema R. T., 1977, Shafttombs and the Inca Empire, Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society, 9, 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Doyon, L. G.
Venue
Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
79-95
ISSN
  • 1551-823X (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-8248
DOI
10.1525/ap3a.2002.11.1.79
OpenAlex
W1968806942
Cited by
3
References
25
Citations by year
2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 2370 d)
Locations
Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Yale University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
shaft tombs, ancestor veneration, seasonal variation, settlement patterns, subsistence farming, hierarchical society, Andean highlands, Ecuador, southern Colombia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review