Cited by 159Temporomandibular Joint DisordersMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Myofascial Pain of the Jaw Muscles: Comparison of Short-Term Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Injections and Fascial Manipulation Technique

Guarda-Nardini, Luca, Stecco, Antonio, Stecco, Carla, Masiero, Stefano, Manfredini, Daniele·2012·CRANIO®

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the short-term effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections and physiatric treatment provided by means of Fascial Manipulation techniques in the management of myofascial pain of jaw muscles. Thirty patients with a Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) diagnosis of myofascial pain were randomized to receive either single-session botulinum toxin injections (Group A) or multiple-session Fascial Manipulation (Group B). Maximum pain levels (VAS ratings) and jaw range of motion in millimeters (maximum mouth opening, protrusion, right and left laterotrusion) were assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at a three-month follow-up. Both treatment protocols provided significant improvement over time for pain symptoms. The two treatments seem to be almost equally effective, Fascial Manipulation being slightly superior to reduce subjective pain perception, and botulinum toxin injections being slightly superior to increase jaw range of motion. Differences between the two treatment protocols as to changes in the outcome parameters at the three-months follow-up were not relevant clinically. Findings from the present investigation are in line with literature data supporting the effectiveness of a wide spectrum of conservative treatment approaches to myofascial pain of the jaw muscles. Future studies on larger samples over a longer follow-up span are needed on the way to identify tailored treatme…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/crn.2012.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guarda-Nardini, L., Stecco, A., Stecco, C., Masiero, S., & Manfredini, D.
Affiliations
Viale XX Settembre 298, 54033 Marina di Carrara (MS), Italy,
Venue
CRANIO®
Published
2012-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
95-102
ISSN
  • 0734-5410 (ISSN-L)
  • 0886-9634
  • 2151-0903
OpenAlex
W1901636404
Cited by
159
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CRANIO® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
myofascial pain, masticatory muscles, temporomandibular disorders, botulinum toxin injection, fascial manipulation, jaw range of motion, analgesia, conservative treatment, RDC/TMD
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Fascia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Male, Masseter Muscle, Middle Aged, Neuromuscular Agents, Pain Measurement, Temporal Muscle, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, Range of Motion, Articular, Treatment Outcome, Pain Threshold, Botulinum Toxins, Type A, Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review