CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comparative Use-Wear Analysis of late Epipalaeolithic (Natufian) chipped stone artefacts from the southern Levant

Richter, Tobias·2007·Levant
DOI 10.1179/lev.2007.39.1.97
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper reports on a use-wear analysis of late Epipalaeolithic (Natufian) chipped stone artefacts from Ain Rahub, Salibiya I and Hayonim Cave, focussing on the study of geometric and non-geometric microliths. Using the synthetic approach of combined low- and high-power analysis a high variation in wear traces was observed, which correspond to a range of functions for different types of stone tools. Some of the findings expand on the detailed technological and typological studies that have been carried out on late Epipalaeolithic assemblages in the southern Levant in recent years, and add to an expanding picture of late Epipalaeolithic stone tool function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/lev.2007.39.1.97

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1016/0305-4403(90)90006-Q · DOI
  2. 10.1080/00438243.1982.9979864 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1017/S0003598X00082995 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/530611 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5<159::AID-EVAN4>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/BF00975111 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bar-Yosef O., 2000, Early Sedentism in the Near East — A Bumpy Ride to Village Life, Pp. 19
  8. 10.3406/paleo.1973.899 · DOI
  9. Becker, M. (1999) Reconstructing prehistoric hunter-gatherer mobility patterns and the implications for the shift to seden-tism: a perspective from the Near East. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Colorado.
  10. 10.1179/jfa.1993.20.4.389 · DOI
  11. Belfer-Cohen, A. (1988) The Natufian Settlement at Hayonim Cave. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Hebrew University, Jerusalem. · DOI
  12. Belfer-Cohen A., 1997, Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society (Mitekufat Haeven), 27, 19
  13. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.05.003 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1017/S0003598X00082983 · DOI
  16. 10.3406/paleo.1990.4524 · DOI
  17. Dobres, M.A. (2000) Technology and Social Agency. Blackwell: Oxford.
  18. 10.1017/S0003598X00064796 · DOI
  19. 10.3406/paleo.1990.4529 · DOI
  20. Fischer A., 1984, Journal of Danish Archaeology, 3, 19, 10.1080/0108464X.1984.10589910 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1017/S0003598X00082958 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/278668 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1996.tb00771.x · DOI
  24. Hayden, B. (1979a) Lithic Use-Wear Analysis. Academic Press: London.
  25. Henry, D.O. (1973) The Natufian of Palestine: its material culture and ecology. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Southern Methodist University.
  26. Henry, D.O. (1989) From Foraging to Agriculture: the Levant at the end of the Ice Age, University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia. · DOI
  27. 10.1007/978-1-4757-2397-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1017/S0003598X0008296X · DOI
  29. 10.1179/009346976791490411 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0305-4403(81)90011-X · DOI
  31. Ingold T, 1990, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9, 5�17
  32. 10.4324/9780203466025 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Juel Jensen, H., 1991, Antiquity, 65, 122�128
  34. 10.1017/S0003598X00064784 · DOI
  35. Kay M., 2000, Lithic Technology, 25, 30�41
  36. Keeley, L. H. (1980) Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  37. Kooyman, B.P. (2000) Understanding stone tools and archaeological sites. University of Calgary Press: Calgary. · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0305-4403(86)90061-0 · DOI
  39. Levi Sala, I. (1989) A Study of Microscopic Polish on Flint Implements. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of London.
  40. 10.1086/204209 · DOI
  41. Neeley M.P., 1994, Antiquity, 68, 275�288, 10.1017/S0003598X00046585 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0305-4403(86)90059-2 · DOI
  43. Odell G. H, 2002, Lithic Technology, 27, 161, 10.1080/01977261.2002.11720996 · DOI
  44. Odell, G. H. (2004) Lithic Analysis. Manuals in ArchaeologicalMethod, Theory and Technique. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers: New York. · DOI
  45. 10.1179/009346986791535780 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1179/009346980791505545 · DOI
  47. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423 · DOI
  48. 10.1017/S0003598X00082971 · DOI
  49. Rosen S, 2000, Lithic Technology, 25, 7, 10.1080/01977261.2000.11720958 · DOI
  50. Schuldenrein, J. (1983) Late Quarternary Paleo-environ-ments and Prehistoric Site Distributions in the Lower Jordan Valley. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
  51. Smith, S. (2005) A comparative analysis of the form and function of chipped stone artefacts from Wadi Faynan and Dhra': implications for the description and interpretation of Neolithic chipped stone variability. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Reading.
  52. 10.1007/s10816-005-5666-4 · DOI
  53. 10.1179/jfa.1974.1.1-2.171 · DOI
  54. 10.1086/203718 · DOI
  55. 10.3406/paleo.1989.4500 · DOI
  56. Yamada, S. (2000) Development of the Neolithic: Lithic Use-Wear Analysis of Major Tools Types in the Southern Levant. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Richter, T.
Venue
Levant
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-06
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
97-122
ISSN
  • 0075-8914
  • 1756-3801
DOI
10.1179/lev.2007.39.1.97
Cited by
17
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review