Cited by 75Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryMotor Control and AdaptationCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

The Bobath concept: a critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation

Lennon, Sheila·1996·Physical Therapy Reviews

Abstract

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the adult population and a major consumer of health care resources. Physiotherapists spend a large proportion of their time rehabilitating patients following stroke using a variety of treatment approaches. The Bobath concept has gained international acceptance as one of the leading approaches in stroke rehabilitation. The aim of physiotherapy using this concept is to re-educate normal movement by the manipulation of a variety of afferent inputs which are mainly proprioceptive. Recent papers have criticized this concept for failing to integrate new knowledge into its theoretical rationale.The aim of this paper is to review the published literature concerning physiotherapy using the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation. The key assumptions that guide current practice are identified: a systems theory of motor control; neuroplasticity shaped by manipulation of afferent inputs; and neurophysiological dysfunction as the primary cause of movement dysfunction. These assumptions are then discussed in relation to current understanding of how movement is controlled in both normal and brain damaged adults following stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/ptr.1996.1.1.35

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Facilitation of normal movement components and task-specific practice using specific manual guidance have been identified as critical elements of the Bobath Concept.

    “Facilitation of normal movement components (which includes strategies to maintain muscle and joint alignment) and task-specific practice using specific manual guidance have been identified as critical elements of the Bobath Concept.1,4,60”
  • The theoretical assumptions underlying the Bobath Concept have been subject to criticism.

    “In the past decade, the theoretical assumptions underlying the Bobath Concept have been subject to criticism 1,4,16”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lennon, S.
Corresponding author
Lennon, Sheila
Venue
Physical Therapy Reviews
Published
1996-09
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
35-45
ISSN
  • 1083-3196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-288X
OpenAlex
W2074895025
Cited by
75
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Therapy Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
Bobath concept, stroke rehabilitation, physiotherapy, motor control, systems theory, neuroplasticity, proprioception, afferent input, movement dysfunction, theoretical assumptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review